-
-
-
lol hauser is trying way to hard hes pulling up the most random **** even if the circumstances dont relate to what happened with mayweather.Comment
-
It wasn't exactly like this. The impression people are getting is that they collected two full samples, and tested both for the sake of comparison. What actually happened is they only collected a single sample. USADA tested Mayweather twice, but both were only "partial samples." They monitored him "until a full sample was collected from Mr. Mayweather." What they did was combine the before and after samples into a single full sample. (The USADA statement doesn't say they combined the samples specifically, but you can infer it from the the quotes)
This isn't describing the Mayweather's case specifically, but here's the procedure for what happens when a partial sample is collected.
I can't for the love of god remember the link to the article I read yesterday, but the description of the scene was that Mayweather had trouble pissing the first time. So it's possible the first partial sample (the before IV sample) was only a few drops of piss. And the second partial sample made up the bulk of the sample.The Athlete's first attempt to provide a sample produced less than the minimum requirement of 90ml of urine (this is known as a "partial sample"). The Athlete therefore placed the collection vessel on the floor, adjusted her clothes and placed the cover on the container. She was then told to wait in the waiting room. At this point, the DCOA was required to deal with the Athlete's partial sample in accordance with Annex F of the WADA International Standards of Testing ("IST") and the partial sample collection procedure contained in the 2011 IAAF AntiDoping Regulations (the "2011 Regulations"). CAS 2014/A/3487
The relevant provisions of Annex F and the 2011 Regulations are set out in detail below (see paragraphs 72 and 82-83). In short, the Regulations require an athlete who has provided a partial sample to select special partial sample collection equipment. Having done so, the athlete should then be instructed to open the relevant equipment, pour the partial sample into the container and seal it as directed by the DCOA. The DCOA should then verify, in full view of the athlete, that the container has been properly sealed. While waiting to provide an additional sample, the athlete should remain under continuous observation and be given the opportunity to hydrate. Once the athlete is able to provide an additional sample, they should be provided with a fresh collection vessel and instructed to provide a sample into that container. Once sufficient urine has been collected, the DCO and athlete should check the integrity of the seal on the partial sample vessel containing the first insufficient sample. Any irregularity in that seal should be recorded. The DCO must then direct the athlete to break the seal to that container and to combine the samples.
According to the USADA statement, Mayweather was informed he was being tested at 1:45 PM. The testing process was not finished until 8:15 PM. Possibly enough time for the IV to work its magic. (If there was magic)Last edited by DoktorSleepless; 09-17-2015, 06:06 PM.Comment
-
Why is it not the hot topic EVERYDAY on Fox Sports ESPN Mike and Mike Skip Bayless Stephen a Dan Patrick Scott Van Pelt (lookin mufckers lol)
Tell me that?!
Why is this so called scandal not playing out like DeflateGate did you dumb fcks lol
I mean we are talking about the highest paid athlete in the world and according to you lame fcks this is such a HUGE indictment against Floyd with incriminating evidence and tarnished legacy and etc etc.
Oh I know Floyd got everybody in his pocket LOL!!!Comment
-
I still haven't seen any explanation why Floyd needed almost 14 times the amount of fluids that one normally takes for de hydration. Especially when he showed no signs of being drained at the weigh in.
During the Lance Armstrong saga they often talked about how he used IV's to flush his system during the tour because he knew when he was going to be tested. Floyd knew he was going to be tested right after the fight.
I have no doubt if Floyd is dirty, and right now I am leaning toward the opinion that he is, more and more will come out as people don't have a reason to protect him and the people around him with their hands out stop getting paid when those fight checks stop coming in.Comment
-
Kind of ironic that a FIomo is having trouble reading LOL...
I clearly said that "What if Floyd was worried about someone snitching on him, so he called up USADA to take the sting out of the IV-cheating... In other words, he'd say..yes I used the IV-solution on the reg but it's OK because USADA granted me a waiver (even though it violates WADA guidelines and Lance Armstrong used the same thing to cheat) and it doesn't violate NSAC rules...
Read slowly please lol...Last edited by MisanthropicNY; 09-17-2015, 05:50 PM. Reason: FIomo didn't understand my previous post.Comment
Tweet
Comment