Just showed replay on ESPNews

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • moy22487
    The silent poster
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2005
    • 3257
    • 99
    • 51
    • 9,856

    #11
    Originally posted by puppy_dogg
    i dont know why people keep saying that judah should have been deducted. it did seem like he did it on purpose but he was not warned a single time for low punching before the low blow. how many times do you see a fighter deducted a point on the very first foul?
    he did follow the low blow with a rabbit punch but still, i dont see it as huge controversy that he was'nt penalized...
    you dont get warnings when you break rules on purpose

    Comment

    • Easy-E
      Gotta want it
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 22686
      • 865
      • 1,739
      • 32,777

      #12
      Originally posted by puppy_dogg
      i dont know why people keep saying that judah should have been deducted. it did seem like he did it on purpose but he was not warned a single time for low punching before the low blow. how many times do you see a fighter deducted a point on the very first foul?
      he did follow the low blow with a rabbit punch but still, i dont see it as huge controversy that he was'nt penalized...
      your joking!
      it was a clearly intentional low blow and then he rabbit punched him!?!?
      how is the not illegal?

      Comment

      • Briman15
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jan 2005
        • 248
        • 9
        • 0
        • 6,535

        #13
        By your logic, if Zab had taken an AK-47 and shot mayweather, he would not have been DQ'd because there was no warning. The purpose of a warning for low blows is because they sometimes happen unintentionally. When a fighter throws one on purpose as Judah did in order to hurt his opponent they can be subject to immediate DQ at the referee's discretion

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP