Tweet
Are you implying that a 25 year-old lightweight in Floyd who just got his @ss kicked by Castillo would best a 25 year-old in Oscar? And that a 25 year-old featherweight in Pacquiao who just stepped up to featherweight would be more competitive to in a fight against Oscar too? Idk why biased people, upset with the reality of the outcome, come in here to complain that this thread is unfair. I mean seriously I picked the point in time where Floyd and Pacquiao were at their peaks at 147. And I used the same logic for picking Oscars prime as a Welterweight.
Comment