Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[Slip Stream]

Dude!!

The comedic value of your posts is of biblical proportions!!!
I do my best, but my best isn't good enough!!!!

LMAO. Glad I don't have brain food as they say in Jamaica!

You are killing me!!! LMA0!

I think it's only fair that everyone get to read the cult of Manny's bible to get a better sense of their rich history of ******ation.

[Spoon23]

Most of how a deluded flowmos thinking in here

are somewhat like this..

They can't do Floyd no more if it was true, but deep inside their hearts they know its the truth. Just as Luke was to Vader hehe

[Spoon23]

Vader: Drink up Floyd! You are dehydrated.

[AllEyesOpen]

I know I've made my point when my post is ignored by the weak minded.

[Rath]

I know I've made my point when my post is ignored by the weak minded.

oh the irony.

VADA, USADA which one do you prefer?

[AllEyesOpen]

oh the irony.

VADA, USADA which one do you prefer?

Which one directly follows wada international standards?

[Spoon23]

Up to this day Hauser's questions has not been answered. This damning question if yet unanswered are evidences in itself tsk tsk tsk.. USADA where are you? Shouldn't you guys sue Hauser by now?


Relating to section "2. Diagnosis"

1. Does Floyd have a documented medical history of chronic dehydration necessitating medical intervention & IV infusion?
2. Who was the treating physician? (I don't think Memo & Ariza have medical degrees; and I doubt the USADA reps were licensed MDs.)
3. Is Floyd & the USADA willing to show the copy of the TUE application? If so & they have nothing to hide, will the application clearly show the precise description of the clinical situation & specific medical indication for the IV infusion; the name of the treating physician; the ICD-10 code E86.0 or E87.1; and all the other relevant medical information listed in sub-section C?
4. Why was oral rehydration not a valid option? What was the existing co-morbidity that ruled it out as an option?


Relating to section "3. Medical best practice treatment"

1. Was Floyd experiencing a medical emergency? (He obviously was not under inpatient care, in which case the volume he infused would not have required a TUE, retroactive or not.)
2. What is the supporting evidence that no alternative treatment (i.e.--drinking orally) could have been used?
3. Who was the ordering physician, and who were the qualified medical personnel to perform the treatment?
4. Why wasn't the infusion done in an appropriate medical setting instead of at home?



There is a well-established body of scientific evidence
to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially

[Rath]

Which one directly follows wada international standards?

the question is very simple, VADA or USADA?

which do you prefer?

or i will assume Floyd's recommended anti doping agency (USADA).

[Rath]

Up to this day Hauser's questions has not been answered. This damning question if yet unanswered are evidences in itself tsk tsk tsk.. USADA where are you? Shouldn't you guys sue Hauser by now?


Relating to section "2. Diagnosis"

1. Does Floyd have a documented medical history of chronic dehydration necessitating medical intervention & IV infusion?
2. Who was the treating physician? (I don't think Memo & Ariza have medical degrees; and I doubt the USADA reps were licensed MDs.)
3. Is Floyd & the USADA willing to show the copy of the TUE application? If so & they have nothing to hide, will the application clearly show the precise description of the clinical situation & specific medical indication for the IV infusion; the name of the treating physician; the ICD-10 code E86.0 or E87.1; and all the other relevant medical information listed in sub-section C?
4. Why was oral rehydration not a valid option? What was the existing co-morbidity that ruled it out as an option?


Relating to section "3. Medical best practice treatment"

1. Was Floyd experiencing a medical emergency? (He obviously was not under inpatient care, in which case the volume he infused would not have required a TUE, retroactive or not.)
2. What is the supporting evidence that no alternative treatment (i.e.--drinking orally) could have been used?
3. Who was the ordering physician, and who were the qualified medical personnel to perform the treatment?
4. Why wasn't the infusion done in an appropriate medical setting instead of at home?



There is a well-established body of scientific evidence
to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially

as the famous intellectual AllEyesclosed once said "I know I've made my point when my post is ignored by the weak minded"

[Zaroku]

I think it's only fair that everyone get to read the cult of Manny's bible to get a better sense of their rich history of ******ation.

still laughing!!!!!