Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[Lester Tutor]

They look at Manny with papal infallibility. The idea that Manny would ever lie to them is completely foreign.

I don't mind that, but when Brian Kenny from ESPN asks Paquiao, and the footage is online btw, as to why he declined what WADA style testing (avoiding the code) Pac just states that blood inhibits the training from the day of the bout - which he said he drew blood on the bout of Morales 1 - or 14-15 days is still not good enough!!

Teddy Atlas then rips on Manny Pacquiao's justification.

That is a good example of papal infallibility. When evidence clearly shows upmost shadyness from Top Rank. lol

[IR0NFIST]

I said steroids. You dont optimally deliver steroids in "shakes". Oral steroids leave metabolites that will ultimately get you popped in a drug test, either now or later as the steroid and its metabolites are identified.

Ariza's game is over the counter stimulants, preworkout basically. That is what is in his "shakes" that is what Rios who was being trained by Ariza got popped with.

Rios already provided an explanation as to why he tested positive. It had nothing to do with Ariza, but an over-the-counter supplement known as Jack3d. The original formula contained a banned substance known as dimethylamylamine (DMAA) and Rios admitted to using it early on in his career.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/boxing/brandon-rios-tests-positive-banned-substance-following-loss-002103876--box.html

[IR0NFIST]

I don't mind that, but when Brian Kenny from ESPN asks Paquiao, and the footage is online btw, as to why he declined what WADA style testing (avoiding the code) Pac just states that blood inhibits the training from the day of the bout - which he said he drew blood on the bout of Morales 1 - or 14-15 days is still not good enough!!

Teddy Atlas then rips on Manny Pacquiao's justification.

That is a good example of papal infallibility. When evidence clearly shows upmost shadyness from Top Rank. lol

This guy used not one, but two exclamation points at the end of that paragraph. Are we suppose to take him seriously now?

[DeadLikeMe]

I don't mind that, but when Brian Kenny from ESPN asks Paquiao, and the footage is online btw, as to why he declined what WADA style testing (avoiding the code) Pac just states that blood inhibits the training from the day of the bout - which he said he drew blood on the bout of Morales 1 - or 14-15 days is still not good enough!!

Teddy Atlas then rips on Manny Pacquiao's justification.

That is a good example of papal infallibility. When evidence clearly shows upmost shadyness from Top Rank. lol

He's one of the most obvious dopers in the history of the sport. All these top guys are cheating in some capacity.

[Lester Tutor]

This guy used not one, but two exclamation points at the end of that paragraph. Are we suppose to take him seriously now?

Don't worry you look more the fool because you didn't anything with substance about the fact I gave you!!!

Here I added 3 exclamation marks for you. Cakewalk forum.

[IR0NFIST]

Don't worry you look more the fool because you didn't anything with substance about the fact I gave you!!!

Here I added 3 exclamation marks for you. Cakewalk forum.

I didn't anything with substance? Derp.

[Lester Tutor]

I didn't anything with substance? Derp.

Didn't add. Now are you BRAVE enough to add about Pacquiao not wanting WADA style for the 2010 Floyd bout?

Are you man enough? Brass balls...

[IR0NFIST]

Didn't add. Now are you BRAVE enough to add about Pacquiao not wanting WADA style for the 2010 Floyd bout?

Are you man enough? Brass balls...

Your deliberate attempt at steering this discussion off topic is very entertaining. However, this thread isn't about Pacquiao, it's about Floyd injecting himself with 750 ml of saline (15 times the allowed amount within a 6 hour interval), without a legitimate TUE from the NSAC, and under highly su****ious circumstances.

[Mr. Punch-Out!!]

It's reason to be highly su****ious though.

Not if he agreed to random blood testing.

[GTTofAK]

Rios already provided an explanation as to why he tested positive. It had nothing to do with Ariza, but an over-the-counter supplement known as Jack3d. The original formula contained a banned substance known as dimethylamylamine (DMAA) and Rios admitted to using it early on in his career.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/boxing...3876--box.html

Sorry it doesn't just pop up back in your system many years later. Rios tested positive because all Ariza's shakes are is preworkout like Jack3d. Ariza probably he thought he was in the clear but forgot that many companies dont list all their ingredients.

Ariza is pretty good at not using banned stimulants but the odds were bound to cathc up with him. Eventually he would use something that wasn't honest in its labeling.