Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[Lester Tutor]

appeal to ridicule fallacy

Such as? Please at least provide some context so I can reply to a particular point. lol

[DeadLikeMe]

Ardent Pacquiao supporters are boxing's equivalent of young earth creationists.

[GTTofAK]

Such as? Please at least provide some context so I can reply to a particular point. lol

Is it not obvious? You do know what ridicule is dont you?

I'll make it easier for you to understand general logic

You should have never posted that. You opened yourself up.

[IR0NFIST]

Actually you don't see the point. To attack Floyd for using USADA is no different than any other athlete choosing to only use VADA. Hauser can play the fools all he wants, but for the media to contextualize inaccuracies from Morales and Floyd is comical.

Yes, 3 more times than the usual, and that's all out of context, again comical. Please list any bouts in this past year where fighters did a serious of 19 blood and urine tests at the magnitude of May-Pac. Only an idiot thinks that the lab testing of 19 blood and urine samples is equivalent to the price of 3-5 tests, and by ''3-5'' that's a conservative guess for undercard bout culture.

Wait for it!!!!

The reason why Hauser makes it seem, or other out of context failure of journalism from other outlets forwarding comedy, is that the PROMOTERS pay for the lab testing.

Wait for it!!!!

TMT = Promoter ? True or False?

[B]All this ''T/E'' ratio of ''when'' or ''why'' is just failed hogwash. We might as well question any other fighter or athlete and their medical affiliates as to why there are consistent differences in test all the time. How can there be a rule for a DEFINITIVE requirement or near-the-dot number for a sample?
Ridiculous.

Agreed. You never had a point to begin with. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.

[IR0NFIST]

[Lester Tutor]

Is it not obvious? You do know what ridicule is dont you?

No. You just quoted me and added that it was ridicule instead of making a more clear point for me to respond to. I know it's classy in this forum for many trollers to just over statements and bring in ad homs as if they provided a checkmate.

Again, hence, ''Again,'' isn't it obvious that Floyd brings in celebrities to insinuate his status quo in the field of entertainment? He doesn't make that any more obvious by bringing in Bieber or Lil Wayne. Hector Camacho, Prince Naseem, Floyd, the whole gladiator intro insinuating status or skill in the sport... whereas now, the most highest paid athlete in the world puppets singers for his entrance?

To make my point clear again, to ad hominemism, which I guess you dorks are just claiming as ''fallacy...''

Again, hence, ''Again,'' isn't it obvious that Floyd brought in Ariza to make a statement against Pac's team?

Geez.. some of you play the fool as good as one in a Shakespeare masterpiece.

[SilverMiles]

Being objectively isn't blindly pointing fingers at everyone.

Mayweather is obviously using steroids. Everyone deserves the benefit of the doubt but Mayweather is a known serial liar and if you lie you will cheat.

You can make arguments for Marquez but for the most part he's been on the up and up.

[Lester Tutor]

Agreed. You never had a point to begin with. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought.

Maybe I should have a Floyd avatar to make it obvious that I'm Pro-Floyd even though I come across this forum objectively and describing the double standards? [sarcasm]

Aside from your Pac Avatar, you are a Pac fan correct? Did I understand that by the picture?

lol.

[Lester Tutor]

Being objectively isn't blindly pointing fingers at everyone.

Mayweather is obviously using steroids. Everyone deserves the benefit of the doubt but Mayweather is a known serial liar and if you lie you will cheat.

You can make arguments for Marquez but for the most part he's been on the up and up.

Jesus Christ, the suspension of disbelief for Floyd haters is that PEDs and Pacquiao are impossible? You can list a thousand names, but when you don't include Pacquiao in the mix, and as we all know back in 2010, didn't want to draw blood....

Cakewalk eating these trollers.

[GTTofAK]

You just quoted me and added that it was ridicule instead of making a more clear point for me to respond to.

There was nothing substantive to respond to. One does not respond to purely fallacious arguments. One simply points out the fallacy. Your post was pure appeal to ridicule. It deserves no other response.

Again, hence, ''Again,'' isn't it obvious that Floyd brought in Ariza to make a statement against Pac's team?

False analogy fallacy, there is no relation between Floyd having stars in his entourage and hiring Ariza.