Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Original Zero-

    First off, the one who issued the TUE is Nsac USADA can't do that since they are under Nevada and Nsac rules prevail.

    If your saying it was USADA who did issue the TUE for Floyd. Then that alone is enough evidence to show USADA fuvked up the wada code.

    Which up to this day they have no explanation to why Froid is dehydrated.

    Or

    If no one issued a TUE. Then Floyd is not absolved of his illegal use of IVS under the wada code.

    You can't spin what Bennett has already said. Sorry bud it's done. NSAC needed to be informed. It's you who is lying to yourself.

    To get this out of your chest. Yes Floyd got away. But there are so many signs pointing to corruption to save his ass. You are only blind by what you don't want to see.

    You can start by answering my question on top. And this one too.

    Why do you think there was no attending physician to come forward to clear the air on why he was severely dehydrated that he can't drink from his mouth?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
      -original zero

      Answer this one instead.

      Why did Floyd over pay USADA? He paid USADA 150k when it should have only been 36k. Why is that?
      As usual, your questions are based on a false premise.

      1. The 150k was agreed to by the promotion and paid by the promotion, meaning Floyd's side AND Manny's side.

      2. It is your opinion that they overpaid, something you've offered nothing to support.

      3. It is your opinion that it should have been 36k, something you've offered nothing to support.

      There are plenty of reasons why testing for one fight would be different than testing for another. First of all, a third of the fee is reserved for future legal actions in the case of a failure. Nobody failed, so that money is refunded. Meaning USADA really got 100k, not 150k.

      Second of all, since USADA testing is voluntary, the parties decide how stringent they want the testing to be. The more they are tested, the more expensive it is going to be.

      Where the fighters are training affects the cost. Where the fight is being held affects the cost. How long testing is going to take place for affects the cost. There are lots of factors.

      Comment


      • Original zero-

        Answer this:

        1.What was the reason why Floyd was severely dehydrated?

        2. Why do you think there was no attending physician to come forward to clear the air on why he was severely dehydrated that he can't drink from his mouth?

        3. Why did Floyd over pay USADA? He paid USADA 150k when it should have only been 36k. Why is that?

        Comment


        • Spoon -

          NSAC did not issue the TUE. You're wrong. 100% wrong.

          NSAC rules allowed IV, in any amount, for any reason, with no special permission needed. A USADA TUE was needed to satisfy the voluntary additional regulations agreed to in the Floyd-Manny contract.

          This is very simple stuff. Does not speak well for your level of intellect that you're struggling so much.

          NSAC was informed of the TUE after a ruling was made. They would have preferred to be informed sooner. USADA saw no reason to inform them sooner since IV was already legal in Nevada, as confirmed by USADA & NSAC.

          No physician is going to speak about treating Floyd because doing so would be illegal. We have HIPAA laws that must be respected.

          Speculate on conspriacy theories all that you wish. You are allowed to be a nutjob. But stop lying about easily verifiable fact. IV was 100% legal in Nevada. No special permission needed. Learn the rules. NSAC & USADA have already confirmed this or speak to any licensed fighter in Nevada or any licensed promoter or manager.

          Get your head out of your ass. Get some fresh air. This is pathetic.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
            Original zero-

            Answer this:

            1.What was the reason why Floyd was severely dehydrated?
            None of your business. We have HIPAA laws for a reason.


            2. Why do you think there was no attending physician to come forward to clear the air on why he was severely dehydrated that he can't drink from his mouth?
            None of your business. We have HIPAA laws for a reason.


            3. Why did Floyd over pay USADA? He paid USADA 150k when it should have only been 36k. Why is that?
            Three inaccuracies in that quote and I already addressed them and answered you in depth. Pay attention.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by original zero View Post
              None of your business. We have HIPAA laws for a reason.




              None of your business. We have HIPAA laws for a reason.




              Three inaccuracies in that quote and I already addressed them and answered you in depth. Pay attention.
              Just as I thought.

              Checkmate.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                Just as I thought.

                Checkmate.
                You're so unbelievably ******.

                Comment


                • Original zero-

                  I'll help you out. Floyd was successful in exploiting the corrupt system. You know the saying money can do wonders. Well this one did.

                  Yes, he got away. But did Floyd really get away.

                  Nope. People can see through him so should you. All polls related to Floyd cheating is evident. Don't be blind now. He may have gotten away with it. But the truth is clear. Froid was maneuvered in a elaborate scheme of corruption.

                  You can't win this.

                  750 ml of IV is not enough to rehydrate a severe case of dehydration which Floyd was suppose to have used. Red flag

                  1000ml of IVS is not even close to the potency of 1 bottle of pedialyte. Which if he really was dehydrated this oral way is even better than sticking a needle.

                  Wada code also tells that you have to be severely dehydrated and be allowed to take IVS not in the house but in a hospital with an attending physician to do the IV treatment which obviously 750ml won't suffice if that was really the case. - red flag

                  Since this wada procedure was broken by USADA and did it in Floyd's home instead. Who was the attending physician that saw a severely dehydrated Floyd who needed IV treatment since he was so sick that he can't open his mouth? Who? - red flag

                  Things you can't answer.

                  Checkmate
                  Last edited by Spoon23; 03-10-2016, 08:59 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by original zero View Post
                    None of your business. We have HIPAA laws for a reason.




                    None of your business. We have HIPAA laws for a reason.




                    Three inaccuracies in that quote and I already addressed them and answered you in depth. Pay attention.
                    I'll rephrase what you just said. None of your business, that doesn't matter. Hippa laws apply. Lol

                    Your like an attorney trying to stop the truth from coming out.

                    All you did is make your point clear. You are basing your argument on rules that will prevent the truth from coming out.

                    Sorry bud. It does matter. In the world of public opinion. floyd has a lot of explaining to do, which you clearly fail to address.

                    And if you can see clearly, If I was Floyd and was innocent. I will find that physician that will clear my name on why I was severely dehydrated. Not doing it. Is a blatant lie that won't fly.

                    This is very simple stuff. Does not speak well for your level of intellect that you're struggling so much.
                    Last edited by Spoon23; 03-10-2016, 08:44 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Original zero-

                      What you said, 'There are plenty of reasons why testing for one fight would be different than testing for another. First of all, a third of the fee is reserved for future legal actions in the case of a failure. Nobody failed, so that money is refunded. Meaning USADA really got 100k, not 150k.'

                      You just lowered it down to 100k if that was the case lol

                      Still 66k more than the standard 36k fee USADA charges. Try again.

                      Your arguments have too many holes.

                      Still what was on record is 150k you merely speculated on 100k

                      Wether it is true or not it is 100k. It is still more than the usual standard fee.

                      Checkmate.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP