Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[Rath]

has the result of Floyd vs Berto USADA random blood test out yet?

[Zaroku]

don't fall for Zaruko alt troll game.

that guy replied with his own post and argued with himself

Rath my question is an honest one.

I just never heard of this before, ex post facto TUE.

Ask me who won the fight and you can hear about that.

But IV TUE thread right?

[GTTofAK]

don't fall for Zaruko alt troll game.

that guy replied with his own post and argued with himself

Yep. I had him responding fast and he forgot which account he was logged in on.



Knew he would slip up of you just made him respond faster than he could keep track of which alt he was on.

[Zaroku]

Yep. I had him responding fast and he forgot which account he was logged in on.



Knew he would slip up of you just made him respond faster than he could keep track of which alt he was on.

I quote myself often. To me, I make sense.

Have you ever heard of an ex post facto TUE?

Answer: I never have until this fight.

Perhaps others can share whether or not they have ever heard of this ex post facto TUE being granted???

Answer: this is something I really want to know. As I find it heighly su****ious. More than su****ious.

[GTTofAK]

I quote myself often.

There is a difference between quoting a previous post to support an argument you are having with someone else and quoting a post to have an argument with yourself.

You are an alt. Everyone else knows it.

[Zaroku]

There is a difference between quoting a previous post to support an argument you are having with someone else and quoting a post to have an argument with yourself.

You are an alt. Everyone else knows it.

I find I make much more sense than you.
Please don't use profanities.

I want fans to tell me about TUE ex post facto???

My main question.

[boxinghead530]

I find I make much more sense than you.
Please don't use profanities.

I want fans to tell me about TUE ex post facto???

My main question.

You still part of this thread? You making yourself look bad by being here?

The answers are you looking for, find them yourself.

[AllEyesOpen]

Unlike most people, I demand that my friends speak the truth always. This friend checks me regularly, and so do a few guys on this site, and in my professional life. Without that, I will probably believe any success I have is all about me, but any failures, we're not my fault.

My friends are vicious! I love them for it. The love me for harsh points of view.

Question???

Can you or anyone tell me in the history of USADA/WADA or what ever testing bodies, for boxing in all the 50 states, how many ex post facto (after the fact) TUE have ever been requested and granted???

This is my big question, for me, an old guy.


Thanks buddy.

I wish we had In n Out burgers here in Tokyo! I would eat an extra burger fir you.

But my big question means a lot to me.

Since most professional boxing do not and have not in the past followed wada standards, it would be hard to find a precedent, but im sure you could in other sports. Now as to what the wada istue states on retroactive tues here's a direct quote:

4.3 An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her The****utic
Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:
a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was
necessary; or
b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or
opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an
application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or
c. The applicable rules required the Athlete (see comment to Article 5.1) or
permitted the Athlete (see Code Article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive
TUE; or
[Comment to 4.3(c): Such Athletes are strongly advised to have a medical file
prepared and ready to demonstrate their satisfaction of the TUE conditions set out
at Article 4.1, in case an application for a retroactive TUE is necessary following
Sample collection.]
d. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the
application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness
requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.
[Comment to 4.3(d): If WADA and/or the Anti-Doping Organization do not agree
to the application of Article 4.3(d), that may not be challenged either as a defense
to proceedings for an anti-doping rule violation, or by way of appeal, or otherwise.]

[Rath]

Yep. I had him responding fast and he forgot which account he was logged in on.



Knew he would slip up of you just made him respond faster than he could keep track of which alt he was on.

thanks man if it was not for you IVed would have missed it.

so this new strategy of clap yap makes sense to me now.

one Floyd fan would post from his other account, then clap and yap and shoulder pat his account using his alt or alts.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

[Rath]

Since most professional boxing do not and have not in the past followed wada standards, it would be hard to find a precedent, but im sure you could in other sports. Now as to what the wada istue states on retroactive tues here's a direct quote:

4.3 An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her The****utic
Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:
a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was
necessary; or
b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or
opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an
application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or
c. The applicable rules required the Athlete (see comment to Article 5.1) or
permitted the Athlete (see Code Article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive
TUE; or
[Comment to 4.3(c): Such Athletes are strongly advised to have a medical file
prepared and ready to demonstrate their satisfaction of the TUE conditions set out
at Article 4.1, in case an application for a retroactive TUE is necessary following
Sample collection.]
d. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the
application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness
requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.
[Comment to 4.3(d): If WADA and/or the Anti-Doping Organization do not agree
to the application of Article 4.3(d), that may not be challenged either as a defense
to proceedings for an anti-doping rule violation, or by way of appeal, or otherwise.]

NSAC said USADA is not authorized to give TUE's now what?