-
-
Okay, sure. If any Floyd fan gets insulted by you they're weak tea. Because as I see it, Manny lost resoundingly and there's no way to reverse engineer a victory in the face of such a one-sided loss, no matter how it's packaged, IVs and all. My point is the same as it has always been since I started posting in this thread. This issue is a pathetic means for people to cry publicly because some can't accept Manny lost and they, for whatever reason, feel honor bound to be morally outraged by everything Floyd Mayweather does. It takes a lot of energy, time and delusion to continue this campaign when it will do Manny little good.
Judah fan, okay....Comment
-
Loooool. I see we've resorted to TMZ in order to "win" this battle now. Absolutely hilarious.Comment
-
Maybe you are being sarcastic with that poster. Not sure.
Floyd, the A side, was allowed to twist their rules to fit his needs. This is known.
Secondly, there have been critics of USADA's handling of boxing. Hauser, Conte and many others including NSAC!
The thing is that if you check what WADA states, Floyd should not have had an IV because WADA states that even IF Floyd was crazy enough to do a long grueling intense workout, the preferred method to rehydrate would still be orally.
Keep in mind that even Wada knows that dehydration for an athlete happens right after a tough long workout. Now add that to what Floyd used as an excuse. Meaning, there was no alternative explanation used by Floyd besides "workout" and "giving blood".
So, lets be real for a second. Floyd wasn't even doing a tough long workout at that point(May 1st). It would actually hurt Floyd not help Floyd by doing that and we know that Floyd is no rookie when it comes to training.
Plus, there was the NSAC doctor who examined Floyd at that point in time and did not see Floyd dehydrated. Maybe that is why Floyd avoided stating that he was dehydrated on his prefight form and/or didn't state that to the NSAC doctor. The NSAC doctor would have disagreed with Floyd's form or conclude "Your lucky Floyd because I can clear you of that diagnosis. You are no longer dehydrated"
WADA states the following:
"[B]The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate.[/B]
It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion."
.Last edited by ADP02; 10-17-2015, 01:11 AM.Comment
-
You know Floyd groupies hate these facts.Maybe you are being sarcastic with that poster. Not sure.
Floyd, the A side, was allowed to twist their rules to fit his needs. This is known.
Secondly, there have been critics of USADA's handling of boxing. Hauser, Conte and many others including NSAC!
The thing is that if you check what WADA states, Floyd should not have had an IV because WADA states that even IF Floyd was crazy enough to do a long grueling intense workout, the preferred method to rehydrate would still be orally.
Keep in mind that even Wada knows that dehydration for an athlete happens right after a tough long workout. Now add that to what Floyd used as an excuse. Meaning, there was no alternative explanation used by Floyd besides "workout" and "giving blood".
So, lets be real for a second. Floyd wasn't even doing a tough long workout at that point(May 1st). It would actually hurt Floyd not help Floyd by doing that and we know that Floyd is no rookie when it comes to training.
Plus, there was the NSAC doctor who examined Floyd at that point in time and did not see Floyd dehydrated. Maybe that is why Floyd avoided stating that he was dehydrated on his prefight form and/or didn't state that to the NSAC doctor. The NSAC doctor would have disagreed with Floyd's form or conclude "Your lucky Floyd because I can clear you of that diagnosis. You are no longer dehydrated"
WADA states the following:
"[B]The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate.[/B]
It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion."
.Comment
-
I'm so much older than y'all don't know ****. You just a bunch of kids, call me grampsComment
Tweet
Comment