Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[boxinghead530]

It's ok you don't have to make that stuff up, son. Chavez Sr. was a fraud. Barrera and Marquez are in my opinion thte highlight Mexican fighters of this era. It's their style. Marquez is a defense fighter. He focuses on controlling range and then counter attacking. Marquez doesn't hunt. Whittaker beat Chavez Sr. Worst scandal ever... but its Top Rank. The same Top Rank that created the ridiculous one hit wonder Yuri Foreman. Go watch the Chavez Sr vs Buck Smith bout. Tell how that wasn't orchestrated with the fakest jabs...look at Smith's record as well. All the same crap with Yuri Foreman spitting out his mouth piece. I have had Cotto suspect as well, and you wonder why he had a falling out with Top Rank.

I know more than you think, son.

Chavez wasn't with top rank when he fought Whitaker. He was with don King for the better part of his career. Plus you saying Chavez is a fraud just like Yuri Foreman, ok. You just lost credibility. Barrera and Marquez are great Mexican fighters but they have nothing on Chavez. Barrera fought like a real Mexican thats why he was super popular. But Marquez was a defensive minded awesome counter puncher. Mexicans never gravitated to him because of the counter punching style.

When Michael carbajal fought Chiquita Gonzalez for the third and final time in Mexico City. Chiquita won but he was getting thoroughly booed throughout the fight because he was defensive minded all fight. Even when Chiquita won the decision the Mexicans booed because they didn't like the way he won. Point is, Mexicans only like the warriors fighting with their heart and desire and press the action. That why Mexicans never like Floyd and his defensive minded style.

Btw you calling me son is kind of funny. Saying son shows me your true age. It's cool, but nice try . You could only wish to know what I know.

[Rath]

Thank you. Glad a few guys get what I am trying to express.

you are an alt, i think deandre is one of your other accounts

[Lester Tutor]

Chavez wasn't with top rank when he fought Whitaker. He was with don King for the better part of his career. Plus you saying Chavez is a fraud just like Yuri Foreman, ok. You just lost credibility. Barrera and Marquez are great Mexican fighters but they have nothing on Chavez. Barrera fought like a real Mexican thats why he was super popular. But Marquez was a defensive minded awesome counter puncher. Mexicans never gravitated to him because of the counter punching style.

When Michael carbajal fought Chiquita Gonzalez for the third and final time in Mexico City. Chiquita won but he was getting thoroughly booed throughout the fight because he was defensive minded all fight. Even when Chiquita won the decision the Mexicans booed because they didn't like the way he won. Point is, Mexicans only like the warriors fighting with their heart and desire and press the action. That why Mexicans never like Floyd and his defensive minded style.

I don't care what "Mexicans" think about Floyd. Why, because that's too generalized. The way Floyd schooled Marquez and Alvarez one could only imagine how sound he is in the ring. You siad I have no credibility when I stated Chavez Sr. was a fraud or a hero given a padded resume. I have gotten into fights myself for calling out Chavez Sr. bogus resume. How old was Chavez Sr. when he fought Kostya Tszu? Compare that performance with that of Floyds age now or a Bhop or a Foreman rocking a 19 yr difference against Moorer.

Did you even watch the Buck Smith fight? Thise scandals are too deep for you. Same thing with the Yuri Foreman one hit wonder. I will be creating videos of those along with what Hauser had to say about that bout.

I am the boogieman around here, son. Watch the tapes. Educate yourself if you claim to know about boxing, son.

[tangalog2200]

Lol? The nouns? It's ok. We can talk about dehydration as we always have been. There were a massive swarm of Top Rank evangelicalists claiming that Floyd wasn't dehydrated at all.. That point is clear, and the Floyd haters can't escape that one...

Second, Hauser never even mentioned "significance" about Floyd's dehydration variance in his first article. He was focusing on masking or simply that USADA lets Floyd get away with things even if results don't matter.. Am I correct? Isn't that Hauser's gripe?

Keep in mind of circumstances as if late when Hauser responded. Surely there are things he knows we don't. Whatever variance one wants to believe from what Hauser thought Floyd's dehydration could've been, he acknowledges it by stating that Floyd showed no signs of significant dehydration. Therefore he's agreeing thay Floyd was dehydrated. Whether it was mild or not is all subjective from anyone who is not Floyd.

This gets tiring. Floyd did no wrong doing. Hauser knows it. The chap continously puts commercial disclaimers after his articles clearly showing he enjoys fictional writing. Look at the books he has written. He isn't just "real world." He enjoys and is good at creating drama and suspense.

fictional writing? ha ha ha

are you really saying there was no 750ml iv put into floyd's system? no vitamins? no tue weeks after? no usada attempt at corrections? no hauser corrections to usada's correction?

here, this is no fiction..significant means large enough to be noticed or have an effect.

so when one says no significant... that means NOT large enough to be noticed or have an effect.

so the point of hauser is the dehydrated excuse is dubious in nature..more so that floyd did break the rules etc etc and this leads to the iv scandal...

and here, again, this is no fiction, fiction means:

written stories about people and events that are not real : literature that tells stories which are imagined by the writer

: something that is not true

[Lester Tutor]

fictional writing? ha ha ha

are you really saying there was no 750ml iv put into floyd's system? no vitamins? no tue weeks after? no usada attempt at corrections? no hauser corrections to usada's correction?

here, this is no fiction..significant means large enough to be noticed or have an effect.

so when one says no significant... that means NOT large enough to be noticed or have an effect.

so the point of hauser is the dehydrated excuse is dubious in nature..more so that floyd did break the rules etc etc and this leads to the iv scandal...

and here, again, this is no fiction, fiction means:

written stories about people and events that are not real : literature that tells stories which are imagined by the writer

: something that is not true

Kevin Iole had already told the world about the IV back in May...nobody seemed to have cared. Therefore...

Yes, Hauser's fiction. At least do a search on Hauser's background. You might learn something broheim.

[boxinghead530]

I don't care what "Mexicans" think about Floyd. Why, because that's too generalized. The way Floyd schooled Marquez and Alvarez one could only imagine how sound he is in the ring. You siad I have no credibility when I stated Chavez Sr. was a fraud or a hero given a padded resume. I have gotten into fights myself for calling out Chavez Sr. bogus resume. How old was Chavez Sr. when he fought Kostya Tszu? Compare that performance with that of Floyds age now or a Bhop or a Foreman rocking a 19 yr difference against Moorer.

Did you even watch the Buck Smith fight? Thise scandals are too deep for you. Same thing with the Yuri Foreman one hit wonder. I will be creating videos of those along with what Hauser had to say about that bout.

I am the boogieman around here, son. Watch the tapes. Educate yourself if you claim to know about boxing, son.

You saying Chavez sr is a fraud then praising floyd is comical.

[DeandreXI]

you are an alt, i think deandre is one of your other accounts

Whoa, slow down chief. Just because I said he's one of the best posters here, doesn't mean it's the same account. This Pacfans M.O.? Just throwing baseless accusations I see...

[Rath]

Whoa, slow down chief. Just because I said he's one of the best posters here, doesn't mean it's the same account. This Pacfans M.O.? Just throwing baseless accusations I see...

zaruko is an alt and a troll, for you to not realize that and saying best poster here smells fishy

but don't mind it, it's just a "PC talk" .

just because i abhor Floyd does not automatically means i am a Pac fan see it works both ways.

[DeandreXI]

zaruko is an alt and a troll, for you to not realize that and saying best poster here smells fishy

but don't mind it, it's just a "PC talk" .

just because i abhor Floyd does not automatically means i am a Pac fan see it works both ways.

Personally I think he's "one" of the "best"


Why? His posts entertains me. Simple as that bruh.

[tangalog2200]

Kevin Iole had already told the world about the IV back in May...nobody seemed to have cared. Therefore...

Yes, Hauser's fiction. At least do a search on Hauser's background. You might learn something broheim.

i have addressed your "fiction" side of the thread,,,

now it's lole...now, it's do a research ha ha ha

lole did not paint a complete picture...

and research on hauser? let us say hauser is a **********,,,he can still cry ****..

when you can not answer the points raised you revert to your diversions...

deflections.....

you want another thread about "fiction"?