Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hauser Hits Back at USADA Over Mayweather/IV Scandal

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Fetta View Post
    NSAC was notified 3 days
    There was like one peep of this news and haven't heard of it since. Can't even find it. Link?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Slick_Rick View Post
      You are putting your head in the sand



      http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/34218049

      This is what is said on the USADA website
      http://www.usada.org/substances/proh...athlete-guide/



      They have broken their own and WADA protocols by allowing Floyd to take the IV, it was a not emergency and he took it in his own home.
      Floyd vigorously claims he walks around at 150, yet we are supposed to believe he was so severely dehydrated he needed a IV, come on now.... if you claim your sole purpose is not protecting Floyd, you will would be demanding answers.
      I suggest you read this.

      Originally posted by USADA
      IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL per 6-hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition unless the athlete has applied for and been granted a The****utic Use Exemption (TUE) under the applicable anti-doping rules. Further, if a prohibited substance that is administered intravenously or via injection, a TUE is necessary for this substance regardless of volume.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
        I suggest you read this.
        IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL per 6-hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition unless the athlete has applied for and been granted a The****utic Use Exemption (TUE) under the applicable anti-doping rules. Further, if a prohibited substance that is administered intravenously or via injection, a TUE is necessary for this substance regardless of volume
        LMAO even the Froid **** riders are killing their own selves with their ****** explanations. Even quoting links that even buries their God Froid even further.

        Reading is fundamental. Keyword there is granted. The TUE wasn't granted yet. Hell, how the f@ck can it be granted when Froid just applied for TUE right then and there when they caught Froid at his house having the IV infusion. This came from USADAs own mouth. USADA are really killing themselves with their ****** explanations just like Froid. And they really can't get out of this one. Both USADA and Froid are exposed and will go down as a joke fighter and joke organization

        Keep on eating Froid's sh!!!!t **** riders
        Last edited by ganthet; 09-12-2015, 11:26 AM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
          I suggest you read this.
          Yes, the link states in bold

          This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval.

          There was no prior approval. The link also disputes its medical value, citing oral ingestion as safer and more effective, with additional benefit (or fault if you're Floyd) of not masking drug use

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Beercules View Post
            Floyd Armstrong Jr.



            hahaha, that's hilarious.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Slick_Rick View Post
              Drug cheats can be caught, years later, once more tech is available, hopefully Floyd and Mannys blood has been stored correctly to be backdated.

              This IV story broke months ago, its taken until now, after months of research to obtain more facts. Just because you have not heard anything new for 48 hours, does not mean it is over...
              Floyd blood being stored by his own bought team lol.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                I suggest you read this.
                An application for a TUE will only be considered for retroactive approval where:

                a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or

                b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or

                c. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.
                Emergency...exceptional, circumstances. Do you really think Mayweather needed emergency treatment? When asked why he needed the IV all he said was "my urine was dark, darker than normal", doesn't sound like he and USADA didn't have time to file a normal TUE, doesn't sound like he couldn't get up and go to a hospital, doesn't sound like he couldn't have periodically rehydrated himself within the legal limit, I doubt he suddenly woke up drained as ***(Unless he cut some James Toney level bodyweight before the weigh-in). And the contract(and contract attempts) to bypass the NSAC with the TUEs/retroactive TUEs, and isn't it out there somewhere that Bennet said they don't get all the details of the testing?

                Obvious he's hiding PED-abuse.
                Last edited by SplitSecond; 09-12-2015, 11:31 AM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                  I suggest you read this.
                  Read what? is this supposed to be your argument?

                  "In cases where IV infusions/injections are deemed medically necessary, good medical practice must ensure that: 1) a clear, well-justified diagnosis has been established; 2) no non-prohibited alternative treatment exists; 3) this treatment will not enhance performance other than to return the athlete to a normal state of health; 4) the treatment is administered by qualified medical personnel in an appropriate medical setting; and 5) adequate medical records of the treatment are maintained. Athletes and support personnel administering IV infusions which cannot be medically justified are committing an anti-doping rule violation (ADRV) whether or not the individual substances are prohibited. In such cases, both the athlete and the personnel administering the IV infusion may be sanctioned.

                  In reference to the bold

                  1. Was it medically necessary? No proof.
                  2. Did they test he was severely dehydrated, at a clinic? nope
                  3. Was it administered in a clinic, nope in his home
                  4. Medically justified, nope, also broke the WADA rules
                  5. NSAC are the only ones that can sanction the IV, USADA permitted it anyway

                  Really don't know what your point is, other than trying to protect Floyd

                  Comment


                  • LMAO R.I.P. b00g13man

                    Thank you for the link that kills yours and the rest of the Froid **** riders arguments and even implicates Froid the 48*-0 God of yours even further

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                      Yes, the link states in bold

                      This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval.

                      There was no prior approval. The link also disputes its medical value, citing oral ingestion as safer and more effective, with additional benefit (or fault if you're Floyd) of not masking drug use
                      According to USADA, he informed them, got tested, took the IV solution then got tested afterwards. The TUE was then granted retroactively. Here are their rules for that just in case you missed it the last time.

                      Originally posted by USADA
                      An application for a TUE will only be considered for retroactive approval where:

                      a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or

                      b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or

                      c. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.
                      If I had to guess, option b would make the most sense.

                      Having posted that, have you got some evidence that the series of events didn't occur in the order USADA stated? If you do, I'd like to see it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP