Originally posted by Fetta
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hauser Hits Back at USADA Over Mayweather/IV Scandal
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Slick_Rick View PostYou are putting your head in the sand
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/34218049
This is what is said on the USADA website
http://www.usada.org/substances/proh...athlete-guide/
They have broken their own and WADA protocols by allowing Floyd to take the IV, it was a not emergency and he took it in his own home.
Floyd vigorously claims he walks around at 150, yet we are supposed to believe he was so severely dehydrated he needed a IV, come on now.... if you claim your sole purpose is not protecting Floyd, you will would be demanding answers.
Originally posted by USADAIV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL per 6-hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition unless the athlete has applied for and been granted a The****utic Use Exemption (TUE) under the applicable anti-doping rules. Further, if a prohibited substance that is administered intravenously or via injection, a TUE is necessary for this substance regardless of volume.
Comment
-
IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL per 6-hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition unless the athlete has applied for and been granted a The****utic Use Exemption (TUE) under the applicable anti-doping rules. Further, if a prohibited substance that is administered intravenously or via injection, a TUE is necessary for this substance regardless of volume
Reading is fundamental. Keyword there is granted. The TUE wasn't granted yet. Hell, how the f@ck can it be granted when Froid just applied for TUE right then and there when they caught Froid at his house having the IV infusion. This came from USADAs own mouth. USADA are really killing themselves with their ****** explanations just like Froid. And they really can't get out of this one. Both USADA and Froid are exposed and will go down as a joke fighter and joke organization
Keep on eating Froid's sh!!!!t **** ridersLast edited by ganthet; 09-12-2015, 11:26 AM.
Comment
-
Yes, the link states in bold
This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval.
There was no prior approval. The link also disputes its medical value, citing oral ingestion as safer and more effective, with additional benefit (or fault if you're Floyd) of not masking drug use
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slick_Rick View PostDrug cheats can be caught, years later, once more tech is available, hopefully Floyd and Mannys blood has been stored correctly to be backdated.
This IV story broke months ago, its taken until now, after months of research to obtain more facts. Just because you have not heard anything new for 48 hours, does not mean it is over...
Comment
-
An application for a TUE will only be considered for retroactive approval where:
a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or
b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or
c. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.
Obvious he's hiding PED-abuse.Last edited by SplitSecond; 09-12-2015, 11:31 AM.
Comment
-
Read what? is this supposed to be your argument?
"In cases where IV infusions/injections are deemed medically necessary, good medical practice must ensure that: 1) a clear, well-justified diagnosis has been established; 2) no non-prohibited alternative treatment exists; 3) this treatment will not enhance performance other than to return the athlete to a normal state of health; 4) the treatment is administered by qualified medical personnel in an appropriate medical setting; and 5) adequate medical records of the treatment are maintained. Athletes and support personnel administering IV infusions which cannot be medically justified are committing an anti-doping rule violation (ADRV) whether or not the individual substances are prohibited. In such cases, both the athlete and the personnel administering the IV infusion may be sanctioned.
In reference to the bold
1. Was it medically necessary? No proof.
2. Did they test he was severely dehydrated, at a clinic? nope
3. Was it administered in a clinic, nope in his home
4. Medically justified, nope, also broke the WADA rules
5. NSAC are the only ones that can sanction the IV, USADA permitted it anyway
Really don't know what your point is, other than trying to protect Floyd
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostYes, the link states in bold
This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval.
There was no prior approval. The link also disputes its medical value, citing oral ingestion as safer and more effective, with additional benefit (or fault if you're Floyd) of not masking drug use
Originally posted by USADAAn application for a TUE will only be considered for retroactive approval where:
a. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary; or
b. Due to other exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for the Athlete to submit, or for the TUEC to consider, an application for the TUE prior to Sample collection; or
c. It is agreed, by WADA and by the Anti-Doping Organization to whom the application for a retroactive TUE is or would be made, that fairness requires the grant of a retroactive TUE.
Having posted that, have you got some evidence that the series of events didn't occur in the order USADA stated? If you do, I'd like to see it.
Comment
Comment