"Be careful what you wish for" Brook to Mosley.

[Box-Office]

Obviously not ranked like that.

They didn't even rank them.

I didn't feel the need to add "in no particular order" because it was a no brainer Porter should be at 1 and Senchenko at 2.

[lfc19titles]

Brooks next fights are Mosley margarito and then Marquez to end his career as an atg

[English Lion]

Brook's resume is absolute garbage and worthy of no praise. He's never lost because he's fought nothing but poor opposition and he only took one risk in his whole career in the Porter fight which he just nicked. I can honestly see Eddie Hearn hyping up a Brook vs Moseley fight, arranging sky sports to show a highlight reel of Mosley in the early 2000's trying to make people forget the fact that Sugar Shane is now a 40 year old punch drunk man.

[LacedUp]

Brook should fight good opponents first. His whole career has been using Khan's name to stay relevant and fighting bums. I doubt he has ever made 7 figures in his life. I mean he is 29, 35 wins and how many names stand out?

Did you give Hatton **** for not fighting Witter?

Why do you care so much what Brook is making? So cringey. You already admitted before that Khan was ducking Brook like a ***** and now you're making all these excuses. Brook fought Porter and now is fighting Chaves. If Chaves is good enough to fight Bradley, he's good enough to fight Brook no?

Who does Khan deserve then? Not Mayweather/Pacquiao. Has he ever made 8 figures? No. He doesn't even deserve Tim Bradley. Has he ever made $2million? No.

Probably why he's fighting the likes of Algieri. knows his limits.

Also, Witter - Hatton is not the same. Hatton was the world champion at the time, Kell is in this case.

Hatton was fighting Mayweather and Pacquiao - Khan is fighting Collazo and Algieri. Terrible analogy.

I didn't feel the need to add "in no particular order" because it was a no brainer Porter should be at 1 and Senchenko at 2.

Well why did you put 1) Mcintyre then as if it was ranked #1?

[LacedUp]

Brook's resume is absolute garbage and worthy of no praise. He's never lost because he's fought nothing but poor opposition and he only took one risk in his whole career in the Porter fight which he just nicked. I can honestly see Eddie Hearn hyping up a Brook vs Moseley fight, arranging sky sports to show a highlight reel of Mosley in the early 2000's trying to make people forget the fact that Sugar Shane is now a 40 year old punch drunk man.

Hearn has already said a Mosley fight is never going to happen.

[Box-Office]

Khan thinks he's a PPV star. You know with all the income from India and Pakistan, you would have thought this guy is a billionaire by now.

I mean, a full 5-6 cameras show up when he lands in Pakistan. How Mayweather can say no to such attention is beyond me.

Kell has never even made $500 K let alone 7 figures. Unless you know something I couldn't find.

[LacedUp]

Kell has never even made $500 K let alone 7 figures. Unless you know something I couldn't find.

Who cares?

Khan has never made $2million. So you can wipe out Bradley, Mayweather, Pacquiao, Garcia rematch and several other fighters.

Hell, you can even wipe out Berto, Guerrero, Maidana rematch too.

[English Lion]

Hearn has already said a Mosley fight is never going to happen.

Yeah and he also said Brook was going to fight an elite welterweight in a huge fight after his two mandatory defenses against Jo Jo Dan and Frankie Gavin. Instead we get Diego Chaves on the under-card of Fury-Wladmir

[LacedUp]

Yeah and he also said Brook was going to fight an elite welterweight in a huge fight after his two mandatory defenses against Jo Jo Dan and Frankie Gavin. Instead we get Diego Chaves on the under-card of Fury-Wladmir

Chaves isn't the big name we would have hoped for. Still #8 welterweight in the world making Brook the only fighter other than Mayweather who has wins over two current top 10 welterweights.

And it's not on the Klitschko-Fury undercard you muppet.

[Box-Office]

Why do you care so much what Brook is making? So cringey. You already admitted before that Khan was ducking Brook like a ***** and now you're making all these excuses. Brook fought Porter and now is fighting Chaves. If Chaves is good enough to fight Bradley, he's good enough to fight Brook no?

Who does Khan deserve then? Not Mayweather/Pacquiao. Has he ever made 8 figures? No. He doesn't even deserve Tim Bradley. Has he ever made $2million? No.

Probably why he's fighting the likes of Algieri. knows his limits.

Also, Witter - Hatton is not the same. Hatton was the world champion at the time, Kell is in this case.

Hatton was fighting Mayweather and Pacquiao - Khan is fighting Collazo and Algieri. Terrible analogy.

I did admit that, but since Khan and Hearn have met my opinion evolved. All Khan really wants is Kell to fight tough opponents. You posted in that thread with the summary of their deal, so you know what Im talking about.

Your Pac/May/Bradley point doesn't make any sense. I'm not saying you have to be in a certain earning bracket to earn fights. Kell has done nothing but use Khan's name and it goes as far as Lovemore N'dou ffs. So, if he think he can fight bums and have an easy route to a Khan payday then forget it.

p.s. If Khan went to TR he would be making more because he has actual selling power. Bradley-Alexander unification sold 300 ish tickets in a 10 k capacity.