Comments Thread For: Floyd Sr: No Reason To Even Discuss Pacquiao Rematch

[therealpugilist]

That was also one of Floyd's lowest out put in yrs let's not act like it was some sort of landslide .He landed more hugs than punches Manny was out hugged two to one

you do know its the opponents fault when they don't adjust, don't know how to cut of the ring, or take away the jab


the blame is one Freddie roach and pac....if something is working you don't stop doing it to make it easy for your opponent or please anyone else...you fight to win nothing more or less

[ox805er]

Don't forget landed more punches at a higher connect rate also.

I see you didn't watch the "slow motion" version of the fight.. SMH.. lol!!

[ox805er]

you do know its the opponents fault when they don't adjust, don't know how to cut of the ring, or take away the jab


the blame is one Freddie roach and pac....if something is working you don't stop doing it to make it easy for your opponent or please anyone else...you fight to win nothing more or less

wonder what fight you were watching... even Floyd Sr. was "what's wrong son?! You're fighting scared, this isn't you" kind of bs between rounds.. Even his crackhead ass knew he was in tough.. and all the flomo's claim he won by a wide margin.. to day you have haymon to thank...

[therealpugilist]

I see you didn't watch the "slow motion" version of the fight.. SMH.. lol!!

I watched the no mo version, with 3-D glasses with my head tilted 45 degrees and Manny won by tko

[therealpugilist]

wonder what fight you were watching... even Floyd Sr. was "what's wrong son?! You're fighting scared, this isn't you" kind of bs between rounds.. Even his crackhead ass knew he was in tough.. and all the flomo's claim he won by a wide margin.. to day you have haymon to thank...

only fool thinks that Mayweather would have won a close fight.....everyone knows the fan favorite usually gets benefit of doubt in close decisions


Ala JMM-PAC 2 and 3.....Sr wasn't having that.....he won 8-4 clearly....that's a wide margin unless you consider winning twice as many rounds a close fight

[12TRIBEsRiSe]

that fight was won with footwork, even if pac was hurt which I call BS, his footwork was C- or D+ in this fight, he cannot cut off a ring to save his life. then he had the nerve to say if Floyd stood still he could have hit him smh. watch some GGG fights and take notes on cutting off the ring since roach has yet to teach u. force your opponent to fight if u think hes running its weird after all those years pac and roach couldn't come up with a game plan that implemented cutting off the ring. nobody wants to see this fight anymore

[therealpugilist]

that fight was won with footwork, even if pac was hurt which I call BS, his footwork was C- or D+ in this fight, he cannot cut off a ring to save his life. then he had the nerve to say if Floyd stood still he could have hit him smh. watch some GGG fights and take notes on cutting off the ring since roach has yet to teach u. force your opponent to fight if u think hes running its weird after all those years pac and roach couldn't come up with a game plan that implemented cutting off the ring. nobody wants to see this fight anymore

End thread.....this^^^^^^....oh yea pac tards...here's a lil salt water to sip while you replenish yourselves in the water of lake minnetonka

[Zaroku]

wonder what fight you were watching... even Floyd Sr. was "what's wrong son?! You're fighting scared, this isn't you" kind of bs between rounds.. Even his crackhead ass knew he was in tough.. and all the flomo's claim he won by a wide margin.. to day you have haymon to thank...

People say all types of things to motivate their fighter.
Without roids, pac has not really been the beast he was.
I heard a guy say the same thing about Marquez. Read posts about Marquez on roids.

PAC got beat easily, no amout of slo mo reviews will change that.

But he is a liar. PAC lied about
1. Having a shoulder problem & not honestly reporting
Or
2. Not having a shoulder injury, and claiming to have one after.

This is a very basic logic question.
When was he lying?
One truth proves he lied one way or the other. That is why he will have to settle those lawsuits. ******** not illegal in Nevada gives them a case.

[Zaroku]

that fight was won with footwork, even if pac was hurt which I call BS, his footwork was C- or D+ in this fight, he cannot cut off a ring to save his life. then he had the nerve to say if Floyd stood still he could have hit him smh. watch some GGG fights and take notes on cutting off the ring since roach has yet to teach u. force your opponent to fight if u think hes running its weird after all those years pac and roach couldn't come up with a game plan that implemented cutting off the ring. nobody wants to see this fight anymore

Well said! PAC's one dimensional style didn't work against a master boxer.

[Zaroku]

End thread.....this^^^^^^....oh yea pac tards...here's a lil salt water to sip while you replenish yourselves in the water of lake minnetonka

Yep! End this thread.
PAC could have ....
PAC should have ...
PAC would have...

If he could have done, what he should have done, he would have! But he did not.

No amount of slo mo reviews can change what happened. PAC is a one dimensional fighter, who is being sued for lying by people who lost a lot of money for believing in him, and putting their hard earned money on him.

The fight is over, but the lawsuits are just beginning. These suits won't be thrown out, but will most likely be settled out of court.