Can we agree in the last 5 years Floyd has been on a tear

[Xi_]

I'm not being conceited when I say, I've forgotten more than you will ever learn about the fight game. There are heads who see all the angles that see through Floyd's sad charade as of late. Ray Corso being one of them. Thing is, I used to be a big Floyd fan... Back when he was a fighter, and not a con man. But now he conducts himself, in and out of the ring, like a lying thief with no honor. Venerate him if you will. I will not.



Impotent ud wins vs decisive demolition. A matter of taste I suppose.



It's like all of you are a choir singing to itself. You think because a bunch of "Floyd people" agree with each other that it somehow validates you? It doesn't. I KNOW I have a valid point about this, and I don't need anyone to validate me. That's called wisdom. I keep my own counsel, and many of you should try it, maybe just for half a day, if it doesn't make your brains implode upon themselves.

bytch please....you know f*** all about the sport and you've proven it time and time again in this thread. kovalev has fought bums compared to floyd. 50 yr old hopkins is his best win.

[Syf]

This has got nothing to do with "agreeing with each other". There just literally isn't any sort of logic you could ever apply to arrive at the conclusion you did, yet you somehow managed it.

Loooool @ wisdom.

Yes, there is. You are a choir singing to yourself. The body of my posts as you so kindly quoted explains my position. I have ceded that on paper Floyd's resume is better, but that Floyd is more of a con man now than a fighter. And paper can be deceiving to a gullible mind.

I prefer fighters. Always will. The most markable FIGHTER right now is Kovalev. Understand now?

bytch please....you know f*** all about the sport and you've proven it time and time again in this thread. kovalev has fought bums compared to floyd. 50 yr old hopkins is his best win.

Sport? Keep being a spectator. Clone. I could show you more in a 9 minute sparring match than you have learned in the 4.2 years you have spent watching primarily Mayweather fights. It's called hands on experience. And you only have it when you have it.

People that know my post history know I am head and shoulders above the average poster here when it comes to overall fight and martial knowledge. And that's just real, no conceit.

[b00g13man]

Yes, there is. You are a choir singing to yourself. The body of my posts as you so kindly quoted explains my position. I have ceded that on paper Floyd's resume is better, but that Floyd is more of a con man now than a fighter. And paper can be deceiving to a gullible mind.

I prefer fighters. Always will. The most markable FIGHTER right now is Kovalev. Understand now?

WTF are you blathering on about now? I asked you a simple question. Name someone with a better resume in the last 5 years. You named Kovalev (lol once again), got that laughed off as ridiculous, and now you're admitting you were wrong, all while trying to sound more knowledgeable? Loooooooool.

[Syf]

WTF are you blathering on about now? I asked you a simple question. Name someone with a better resume in the last 5 years. You named Kovalev (lol once again), got that laughed off as ridiculous, and now you're admitting you were wrong, all while trying to sound more knowledgeable? Loooooooool.

Over literalism at its finest.

The question of the thread was who's been on a "tear".

And being on a tear is obviously an ambiguous term, means different things to different people.

Sorry floyd's victories as of late haven't been very inspiring. I'm glad they have been for you though. Go have a party. Invite all the Floyd toe lickers from this thread. Should be a grand soiree.

[Syf]

more knowledgeable? .

Indeed.

Weren't you one of the guys picked Broner over Maidana? Wasn't I in all the Maidana Broner threads explaining why Broner was going to lose? Fast forward.. Booger. Wasn't you saying Floyd would beat Maidana easily and it wouldn't be a challenge? Wasn't I, conversely, in post after post explaining to the deaf dumb and blind why Mayweather would struggle against Maidana. Weren't you one of the scoffers of that notion?

Yeah.. you have no independent knowledge. Back in line with the rest of the clones. I might throw you a bone out of pity every now and then.

[Larry the boss]

not an impressive resume and im not trollin


none of those guys are hall of famers that were in their prime - that is not opinion, its fact so we can leave the emotion at the door and use this fact to show that its not an impressive resume

200 replies later and i just ethered the whole thread

my work here is done

Was Floyd in his prime?

[b00g13man]

Over literalism at its finest.

The question of the thread was who's been on a "tear".

And being on a tear is obviously an ambiguous term, means different things to different people.

Sorry floyd's victories as of late haven't been very inspiring. I'm glad they have been for you though. Go have a party. Invite all the Floyd toe lickers from this thread. Should be a grand soiree.

This is the post you responded to.



Kovalev is a bull**** answer. Fail on your part.

Indeed.

Weren't you one of the guys picked Broner over Maidana? Wasn't I in all the Maidana Broner threads explaining why Broner was going to lose? Fast forward.. Booger. Wasn't you saying Floyd would beat Maidana easily and it wouldn't be a challenge? Wasn't I, conversely, in post after post explaining to the deaf dumb and blind why Mayweather would struggle against Maidana. Weren't you one of the scoffers of that notion?

Yeah.. you have no independent knowledge. Back in line with the rest of the clones. I might throw you a bone out of pity every now and then.

Dafuq are you talking about? Me? Pick Broner? I picked against him that fight, and I've actively rooted against him every time out and laughed more than most whenever he's got that work.

You definitely have me confused with someone else because I definitely foresaw Maidana giving Floyd problems.

Yet another fail on your part. Try again.

[DeadLikeMe]

[Syf]

This is the post you responded to.



Kovalev is a bull**** answer. Fail on your part.



Dafuq are you talking about? Me? Pick Broner? I picked against him that fight, and I've actively rooted against him every time out and laughed more than most whenever he's got that work.

You definitely have me confused with someone else because I definitely foresaw Maidana giving Floyd problems.

Yet another fail on your part. Try again.

I never once said Kovalev beat better opponents. I said he has consistently won in more impressive fashion against good opposition. And to me, being on a tear more fits Kovalev than Floyd, who A. Seeks a prefight advantage every time out, and B. Has the corrupt establishment behind him. When he used to defense without clinching 1000 times his spiel was more bearable, but now it's not. I'll take an honest entertaining fighter over a crook every time.

Keep saying I said things I didn't though.

I'm pretty sure you are lying about your post history too but I can't be asked to check. Don't got time like that.

[b00g13man]

I never once said Kovalev beat better opponents. I said he has consistently won in more impressive fashion against good opposition. And to me, being on a tear more fits Kovalev than Floyd, who A. Seeks a prefight advantage every time out, and B. Has the corrupt establishment behind him. When he used to defense without clinching 1000 times his spiel was more bearable, but now it's not. I'll take an honest entertaining fighter over a crook every time.

Keep saying I said things I didn't though.

I'm pretty sure you are lying about your post history too but I can't be asked to check. Don't got time like that.

Loooool. So why respond to me with something that wasn't the answer to my question? Sounds like a dumb move.

"Keep saying I said things I didn't though" - Just like the entire back story you made up for me right?

The Ls just keep on piling up for you, don't they?