Who has the better resume and accomplished the most in the sport GGG or Khan

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nivek535
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2013
    • 2685
    • 104
    • 212
    • 9,740

    #11
    of course khan.
    if you scaled khan up to 160, cotto wouldve fought him twice already.

    Comment

    • nivek535
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2013
      • 2685
      • 104
      • 212
      • 9,740

      #12
      Originally posted by John Locke
      lol why do you ask questions you know the answer to?
      it's larry's way of diminishing ggg's success

      Comment

      • aldo5408
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2012
        • 7589
        • 499
        • 724
        • 16,792

        #13
        Originally posted by nivek535
        it's larry's way of diminishing ggg's success
        Success lol

        Comment

        • BrometheusBob.
          All Time Great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2015
          • 20457
          • 915
          • 1,915
          • 156,555

          #14
          OP be like




          I'm gonna vote for GGG, and if you feel otherwise feel free to refer to the many P4P lists that have GGG higher than Khan (aka literally any P4P list).
          Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 08-20-2015, 02:50 PM.

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #15
            Originally posted by Scott-Weiland
            I don't even see how it is comparable, I'm picking GGG.

            GGG has bulldozed champions and former champs with relative ease, in most instances rarely giving a round away with maybe the exception of Monroe.

            I mean seriously when was his last noteworthy win against a really credible opponent ? Maidana Judah ?
            Golovkin has never fought a champion.

            Comment

            • Ryn0
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2007
              • 11139
              • 310
              • 269
              • 20,767

              #16
              Originally posted by Scott-Weiland
              I don't even see how it is comparable, I'm picking GGG.

              GGG has bulldozed champions and former champs with relative ease, in most instances rarely giving a round away with maybe the exception of Monroe.

              I mean seriously when was his last noteworthy win against a really credible opponent ? Maidana Judah ?
              GGG has at no point beaten a champion, The WBa belt he picked up as an Interim belt from Nunez before being promoted. His WBC belt he picked from Rubio and its an interim belt.

              The only former champions he has beaten are Kassim Ouma (at 154 and hasn't been champion since 2005), Daniel Geale (losses to Barker and Cotto recently.

              I think that is literally it. Nowhere near Khan.

              Comment

              • Ryn0
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2007
                • 11139
                • 310
                • 269
                • 20,767

                #17
                Originally posted by BrometheusBob
                OP be like




                I'm gonna vote for GGG, and if you feel otherwise feel free to refer to the many P4P lists that have GGG higher than Khan (aka literally any P4P list).
                The question isn't who is the better fighter but who has fought the better fighters. There is no argument.

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Scott-Weiland
                  I don't even see how it is comparable, I'm picking GGG.

                  GGG has bulldozed champions and former champs with relative ease, in most instances rarely giving a round away with maybe the exception of Monroe.

                  I mean seriously when was his last noteworthy win against a really credible opponent ? Maidana Judah ?
                  Lemieux is the first reigning champion that Golovkin has faced. He got handed his title, which was an interim title if I remember correctly.

                  Comment

                  • LoadedWraps
                    Official NSB POTY 2016
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 24197
                    • 1,009
                    • 1,464
                    • 190,165

                    #19
                    Originally posted by LarryXXX
                    Post and discuss....
                    Khan has the better resume right now, but what's the actual point of this thread larryx? Because in no way, shape, or form, does that support any argument that Khan is in any way, shape, or form better than GGG, because he isn't. He never was, and he never could be. And GGG can add much more to his resume than Khan can at this stage in their careers. So I hope this isn't some thread intended to take shots at GGG, or overrate Khan.

                    Comment

                    • Larry the boss
                      EDUCATED
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 90798
                      • 6,419
                      • 4,473
                      • 2,500,480

                      #20
                      Originally posted by LoadedWraps
                      Khan has the better resume right now, but what's the actual point of this thread larryx? Because in no way, shape, or form, does that support any argument that Khan is in any way, shape, or form better than GGG, because he isn't. He never was, and he never could be. And GGG can add much more to his resume than Khan can at this stage in their careers. So I hope this isn't some thread intended to take shots at GGG, or overrate Khan.
                      Khan is much younger then GGG is he not?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP