manny didn't walk away u dunce. manny was willing to negotiate the extra testing, but floyd wouldn't budge!! i mean manny was the #1 p4p, superstar, and floyd was fresh back from his "retirement". so how can floyd dictate terms like this?????????? manny drew over 60,000+ to watch him fight clottey! who was the bigger star at the time??? at least manny tried to negotiate.
and when negotiations were heating up floyd "retires" he even told a sick dying kid to his face that he won't fight manny. it was the SICK DYNING KIDS WISH TO SEE HIM FIGHT MANNY IN 2010!!!!!!!!!!!!! and floyd RETIIIIRRREEEDDD!!!!!!!!
and i didn't believe bradley deserved top ten p4p in the first pac fight but he deserved it when he beat marquez who just KO'ED MANNY PACQUIAO #1/2 p4p!!!! and was awarded fighter of the year 2012 by ring magazine and placed at #3 p4p!!!! get a frickin clue seriously. it's easy to understand.
and floyd beat a 36 year old (which is ancient for a guy with manny's style) way past prime manny who had one good arm and only three fights ago suffered a huge humiliating devastating almost career ending KO. floyd's win against manny doesn't prove anything except to say he was far more fresher than manny. that's it. i don't expect u or the biased american "journalists" to understand this.
and when negotiations were heating up floyd "retires" he even told a sick dying kid to his face that he won't fight manny. it was the SICK DYNING KIDS WISH TO SEE HIM FIGHT MANNY IN 2010!!!!!!!!!!!!! and floyd RETIIIIRRREEEDDD!!!!!!!!
and i didn't believe bradley deserved top ten p4p in the first pac fight but he deserved it when he beat marquez who just KO'ED MANNY PACQUIAO #1/2 p4p!!!! and was awarded fighter of the year 2012 by ring magazine and placed at #3 p4p!!!! get a frickin clue seriously. it's easy to understand.
and floyd beat a 36 year old (which is ancient for a guy with manny's style) way past prime manny who had one good arm and only three fights ago suffered a huge humiliating devastating almost career ending KO. floyd's win against manny doesn't prove anything except to say he was far more fresher than manny. that's it. i don't expect u or the biased american "journalists" to understand this.
Comment