Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Mayweather's Top 5, GGG, More

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
    Why would Tyson be over Floyd? his resume is **** and why Joe Frazier?out side of 1 win over Ali his resume is not that great..Larry Holmes?? why?George Fcoreman??why? Chavez?? why?Argello???why? Marciano??why?
    Of course knew exactly what I'd expect from some bonehead to go thru a list and want to debate this guy and that guy. If it has to be explained to you, you'd never get it anyway. Just goes to show you, Clown that for all the guys you didn't question, in your mind the deserve to be legends ahead of Floyd no question. And for the guys you did question, they deserve to be there for fighting everyone put in front of them in the careers, Win, Lose or Draw, multiple times if need be, to fight the best of the best in their era. The all had war after war. That's credible. Floyd seeking to brand a "0", being strategic about WHO he fought and WHEN was about putting "names" on his resume and money in the bank. Aaron Pryor wasn't even on that list and no way would Floyd of had the ballz to fight an Aaron Pryor in his prime. That list of legends, had more machismo than Floyd ever had in his career. Joe Frazier who you belittled, was a part of four of the most epic fights on a global stage, ever. Do your homework idiot.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by wlliam View Post
      Breads last response is hilarious

      Dude was probably on about Thurman facing Spence too..all bcuz Floyd said

      As far as Berto being the opponent of choice, i can see the reasoning behind it andd im ok with it. They went with Bertos past accomplishments at 147lbs(former WBC,IBF Titlist) rather than his current standing. All you Khantrrds shouldnt have a problem with that logic! Current standing aside, again-khantrrds shouldnt have a problem, and if we go with whats been accomplished specifically at 147lbs, Berto has accomplished more than Brook, Thurman, Porter and especially Khan. Even if we go with current standing thatll still exclude Khan bcuz Brook, Porter snd Thurman have beaten higher rated 147lbers than khanjob.
      ****** theory. The maybe Floyd should fight Roberto Duran for having more accomplishments than Berto. If ur Floyd Mayweather, you fight best of your time. If you're going to charge PPV, then fans deserve better than Berto period. Nobody gives a **** about what u did 3, 4, 5 yrs ago which is why Khan can't get Floyd/Manny. He was beaten by Garcia, Peterson & Prescott at 140, in 2010/2011 or thereabouts, and fought won't fight any of the best at 147. Floydcould have fought Thurman, Brook, Porter, Bradley or GGG to grow a legacy. He chose a tomato can who is dating his ex hooker, Miss Jackson. Lame.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Jc8804 View Post
        How is canelo a super fight when his biggest wins were over alfonzo gomez and josesito lopez (140 pounders ) at 154.

        And a controversial win over an overated trout in Texas of all places..

        That got him the floyd fight. But breadman thinks thats a super fight . Why? Cause canelo is mexican ?? Race sells the ppv . Not accomplishment breadman.

        Id love to hear bread speak on that.

        imo canelo has always been hype. Hyped up to boost up floyds resume,But in reality that kid has beaten a bunch 140 pounders at 154 And trout.
        (i had trout winning) canelo gets catchweighted by floyd to top it off.

        Bottom line is canelo has a angulo after prison another controversial win over Lara and kirkland after inactivity adter floyd .Canelo is overated . Super fight .lmao
        Race hype
        The same Trout whooped Cotto. Canelo isnt a hypejob any more, hasnt beensince '13 after he whooped Trout, even dropped him. Canelo has consistently faced legit top level foes since, Trout, Floyd, Lara with Angulo and Kirkland in between. You sir, DKSAB!

        This that logic i despise, "fans" discrediting a guy like Canelo while attempting to make a case for guys like KHAN and Cotto.

        Comment


        • #14
          Canelo did not whoop trout. Angulo out of prison looked like shht .and he quit vs lara. Kirkland was shot and inactive. Stop trying to hype up canelo. He is a small man beater.

          Marciano has a better resume than floyd

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by TLC8 View Post
            Not only can he not read Harry Potter, he also has no idea about the legends before him who paved a way for a rube like Floyd Jr to come from the hood to make a living. Duran, Whitaker, Chavez Sr, are greats, but Floyd has no idea what they really did, who they fought, and where they fall in line. In no particular order are a list of legends that warrant a higher spot on the All Time Greats list, win, lose, or draw, ahead of Floyd Jr:

            Ali
            Marciano
            Joe Louis
            Ray Robinson
            Ray Leonard
            Marvin Hagler
            Alexis Arguello
            Salvador Sanchez
            Joe Frazier
            George Foreman
            Tommy Hearns
            Roberto Duran
            Julio Cesar Chavez
            Henry Armstrong
            Archie Moore
            Larry Holmes
            Bernard Hopkins
            Mike Tyson
            Michael Spinks

            Just to name a few...
            I like how ur opinion revolves around Floyd

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Jc8804 View Post
              Canelo did not whoop trout. Angulo out of prison looked like shht .and he quit vs lara. Kirkland was shot and inactive. Stop trying to hype up canelo. He is a small man beater.

              Marciano has a better resume than floyd
              Marciano? If Floyd wasnt closing in on that 49-0, nobody would be talkn about Marciano. Last time i remember sonebody bringn up Marciano was in that barbershop scene in "Coming to America"
              Who at 154lbs has faced and beaten better comp than Canelo? Thats how ratings work

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by TLC8 View Post
                ****** theory. The maybe Floyd should fight Roberto Duran for having more accomplishments than Berto. If ur Floyd Mayweather, you fight best of your time. If you're going to charge PPV, then fans deserve better than Berto period. Nobody gives a **** about what u did 3, 4, 5 yrs ago which is why Khan can't get Floyd/Manny. He was beaten by Garcia, Peterson & Prescott at 140, in 2010/2011 or thereabouts, and fought won't fight any of the best at 147. Floydcould have fought Thurman, Brook, Porter, Bradley or GGG to grow a legacy. He chose a tomato can who is dating his ex hooker, Miss Jackson. Lame.
                Berto has accomplished more than Brook, Thurman, Porter, thats a FACT, not a theory. Hes held 2 titles before to 1 title split between Porter and Brook, Thurmans the WBAs #1 contender to Floyds strap, fk that "regular" tab. Thats IN TERMS OF ACCOMISHMENTS as i specifically stated in my post and ialso specifically stated if he was to choose somebody who is CURRENTLY RATED HIGH itd be Brook, Thurman or Porter. Take a midol girl!

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by wlliam View Post
                  Berto has accomplished more than Brook, Thurman, Porter, thats a FACT, not a theory. Hes held 2 titles before to 1 title split between Porter and Brook, Thurmans the WBAs #1 contender to Floyds strap, fk that "regular" tab. Thats IN TERMS OF ACCOMISHMENTS as i specifically stated in my post and ialso specifically stated if he was to choose somebody who is CURRENTLY RATED HIGH itd be Brook, Thurman or Porter. Take a midol girl!
                  You're a phukkin idiot. And Roberto Duran has accomplished more than Berto. Is that what you want idiot; a dated resume??? U should be drug tested clown. Berto isn't relevant today. 3-3 in his last 6 fights and a failed drug test. He did beat Steve Upsher Chambers though... Lol! The top 3 or 4 ranked fighters at '47 are Brook, Thurman, Porter and they are relevant today. All three of those guys are hands down a better selection than Berto. Throw in Bradley, Khan, Algieri and Provodnikov are also better choices than Berto. In fact, Garcia, Matthysse, and Rios are more credible than Berto. Dude, Berto should be fighting on ESPN!

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by wlliam View Post
                    I like how ur opinion revolves around Floyd
                    The conversation was around Floyd to start with Moron

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      if floyd wanted an easy KO to retire with, he wouldve picked khan.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP