Gennady Golovkin vs. David Lemieux

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mathed
    molṑn labé
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 54549
    • 2,741
    • 2,984
    • 224,675

    #71
    Originally posted by Pigeons
    Another pathetic Golovkin mismatch.

    This one only costs $59.99!
    Yet, you just paid $80.00 for Floyd to win 12 rounds against Berto.

    Comment

    • revs1227
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 8039
      • 255
      • 279
      • 15,341

      #72
      how is this poll that one sided ? lemiuex is dangerous and GGG has alotta holes in his defense

      Comment

      • xhiddenx87
        Undisputed Champion
        • Apr 2015
        • 1783
        • 52
        • 7
        • 23,516

        #73
        Good one!
        ---
        I think GGG will end it in the 5th round. that's how one sided this fight will be, GGG can choose in what round he will end it.

        Comment

        • Eastcoast
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2014
          • 8639
          • 288
          • 0
          • 15,501

          #74
          Mayweather fans have gull talking **** about this fight. What was the point of Mayweather fighting Ortiz, Guerrero, Marquez, Baldomir, and Berto. Hopelessly one-sided fights with no action value.

          Golovkin/Lemieux has the makings of McClellan/Jackson and Hagler/Hearns.

          Comment

          • bigjavi973
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2013
            • 24007
            • 759
            • 1,480
            • 1,236,071

            #75
            Originally posted by Eastcoast
            Mayweather fans have gull talking **** about this fight. What was the point of Mayweather fighting Ortiz, Guerrero, Marquez, Baldomir, and Berto. Hopelessly one-sided fights with no action value.

            Golovkin/Lemieux has the makings of McClellan/Jackson and Hagler/Hearns.
            Ortiz was the WBC Welterweight Champion, Guerrero was his mando, he had a fight lined up with judah, but judah lost & baldomir was the champ at the time. The JMM & Berto fight was bs imo... but you know this and shit on Floyd while praise GGG for fighting stumblebums.

            Comment

            • The Big Dunn
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 69264
              • 9,488
              • 7,834
              • 287,568

              #76
              Originally posted by Eastcoast
              Mayweather fans have gull talking **** about this fight. What was the point of Mayweather fighting Ortiz, Guerrero, Marquez, Baldomir, and Berto. Hopelessly one-sided fights with no action value.

              Golovkin/Lemieux has the makings of McClellan/Jackson and Hagler/Hearns.
              except JMM (comeback) and Berto (finale), the purpose was the same as GGG/Lemuiez-acquiring titles and unifying the division.

              What, you only allow certain fighters to do that?

              Comment

              • Eastcoast
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2014
                • 8639
                • 288
                • 0
                • 15,501

                #77
                Originally posted by The Big Dunn
                except JMM (comeback) and Berto (finale), the purpose was the same as GGG/Lemuiez-acquiring titles and unifying the division.

                What, you only allow certain fighters to do that?
                If Floyd wanted that WBC title so bad, why didn't he go after an undefeated Berto rather Ortiz? Ortiz was expected to lose to Berto the same way Maidana was expected to lose to Broner. Floyd was picking scraps. He chose Baldomir over Margarito, both had belts.

                Also Floyd's been in a position he didn't need to defend the WBC against Guerrero. He's had mando's with Thurman and Lara with his WBA titles and it means nothing to him nor would the orgs think of trying to enforce it.

                Comment

                • Eastcoast
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2014
                  • 8639
                  • 288
                  • 0
                  • 15,501

                  #78

                  Comment

                  • big_james10
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2007
                    • 6809
                    • 319
                    • 39
                    • 13,287

                    #79
                    I am seeing no buzz on social media sites about this fight and barely a blip on this message board, which is essentially the home base of GGG fan club. This fight might have attracted 1 million views if it was on regular HBO. On PPV, it likely won't sell more than 50,000 PPVs and definitely won't break 100,000.

                    Comment

                    • Hougigo
                      Gossip Girl
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 38755
                      • 730
                      • 236
                      • 47,223

                      #80
                      Originally posted by big_james10
                      I am seeing no buzz on social media sites about this fight and barely a blip on this message board, which is essentially the home base of GGG fan club. This fight might have attracted 1 million views if it was on regular HBO. On PPV, it likely won't sell more than 50,000 PPVs and definitely won't break 100,000.
                      Probably be lucky if it broke Dawson/Hopkins I yea?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP