Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shawn Porter still salty about Brook - Picks Khan

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
    Lol@ credible boxing analyst


    I had Brook winning, but i also said it could be called a draw

    As did many

    such as Brooks ex stable-mate Ryan Rhodes

    It was a cagey nervous performance by Brook, he got the win, but lets not act like he dazzled and annihilated Porter.

    The most impressive thing about the win was he did it in Porters backyard
    Laced Up is the same guy who says rankings don't mean anything, when I brought up Collazo being in WBA top 10 prior to Khan, but conveniently makes exception for IBF. Geez I really wonder why that is? Kell-ends really are bell-ends and they really really are the Special Ones.
    Last edited by Box-Office; 08-04-2015, 03:27 AM.

    Comment


    • #72
      Too bad Kell-ends run out of names to talk about after Porter.

      I mean what else are we going to hear? Carson Jones stopping Brian Rose in 1 somehow makes Brook's struggle to win a MD in his home city legit?
      Last edited by Box-Office; 08-04-2015, 03:37 AM.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
        "official stats"

        What a level to sink down to. A grazing shot counts as a "punch landed".
        So now you're denying that the punches were landing?
        You're really going with this hokus pokus story of Brook "outclassing" Porter, very odd because most people scoring the fight had it extremely close and minus the constant clinching from Brook (Brook should have been deducted points) Porter would have landed even more.
        What more do you expect from a guy who was beaten up to a pulp by Carson Jones, he now has to clinchy bear to avoid any inside action the only thing is his fight on the range isn't anywhere near as good as Khans.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
          So now you're denying that the punches were landing?
          You're really going with this hokus pokus story of Brook "outclassing" Porter, very odd because most people scoring the fight had it extremely close and minus the constant clinching from Brook (Brook should have been deducted points) Porter would have landed even more.
          What more do you expect from a guy who was beaten up to a pulp by Carson Jones, he now has to clinchy bear to avoid any inside action the only thing is his fight on the range isn't anywhere near as good as Khans.
          They got Jones' team to make it catch weight few weeks before the fight for the rematch. Pathetic!!

          This guy's whole career is based on cashing out on a Khan fight. He's a bigger "khantard" than any of us lot.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
            ****ting on Khan? that's a understatement you wally



            what you are doing is beyond that, you are obsessed, ur life is dedicated to hating on Khan

            you have seriously lost the plot Dirk lol
            And you basically only post about me now.....an anonymous person on the internet who annoyed you lol.....at least Khan is a boxer....you might as well make a new site called DirkScene. Going through my posting history with a fine-tooth comb.

            I should never have bullied a spastic.

            Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
            Laced Up is the same guy who says rankings don't mean anything, when I brought up Collazo being in WBA top 10 prior to Khan, but conveniently makes exception for IBF.
            Where was the Collazo ranked in the WBA? And Khan wasn't WBA Champion so I don't understand the relevance.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
              Laced Up is the same guy who says rankings don't mean anything, when I brought up Collazo being in WBA top 10 prior to Khan, but conveniently makes exception for IBF. Geez I really wonder why that is? Kell-ends really are bell-ends and they really really are the Special Ones.
              I have never made an exception for that. It's not my problem you're too thick to understand simple logic.

              Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
              So now you're denying that the punches were landing?
              You're really going with this hokus pokus story of Brook "outclassing" Porter, very odd because most people scoring the fight had it extremely close and minus the constant clinching from Brook (Brook should have been deducted points) Porter would have landed even more.
              What more do you expect from a guy who was beaten up to a pulp by Carson Jones, he now has to clinchy bear to avoid any inside action the only thing is his fight on the range isn't anywhere near as good as Khans.
              Well he landed a lot of shots behind the head, sure. They don't count though. He didn't land a clean headshot all night. Maybe a jab? Not even sure of that. He landed some body shots in the clinches and landed a pretty good headbutt in the second. Othr than that he looked like an absolute amateur who had no business in the ring with the special one.

              If any of the two should have points deducted it was Porter for headbutting (twice) and hitting behind the head 79 times. Conveniently not talked about.

              Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
              They got Jones' team to make it catch weight few weeks before the fight for the rematch. Pathetic!!

              This guy's whole career is based on cashing out on a Khan fight. He's a bigger "khantard" than any of us lot.
              Eh? They made it at 152? The same Jones who had fought at LMW and recently at MW.

              Jesus, talk about smashing a pie in your own face.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                And you basically only post about me now.....an anonymous person on the internet who annoyed you lol.....at least Khan is a boxer....you might as well make a new site called DirkScene. Going through my posting history with a fine-tooth comb.

                I should never have bullied a spastic.



                Where was the Collazo ranked in the WBA? And Khan wasn't WBA Champion so I don't understand the relevance.
                He was ranked by the WBO - Box Office doesn't even remember his own drivel.

                Comment


                • #78
                  I'd favor Brook in this fight,but would not be surprised by a Khan win tho..This fight needs to happen already..

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Kell Brook came up the hard way, what a complete ****ing joke by LacedUp. Fought bums until he got a title shot, sure is the hard way, oh and guess what the bum spree continues after his 1 live body win.

                    Bloody Kell ends I tell you.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                      He was ranked by the WBO - Box Office doesn't even remember his own drivel.
                      That was Barrera with the WBO, you mug.

                      Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                      Eh? They made it at 152? The same Jones who had fought at LMW and recently at MW.

                      Jesus, talk about smashing a pie in your own face.
                      Brook-Jones II was exactly 2 yrs ago, recently?

                      Anyways,they made him add pounds a few weeks before the fight. It was initially a WW fight. Pathetic!!!!
                      Last edited by Box-Office; 08-04-2015, 02:18 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP