Comments Thread For: De La Hoya Eyes Cotto-Canelo vs. Golovkin-Lemieux
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
No one. That doesn't mean he isn't ducking... You can't put 168 on notice, then after you're called out on it start adding asterisks and/or conditions to it. Are you off the Canelo bandwagon already?Comment
-
You should put the same standards for Cotto if that's the case with asterisks/conditions. Just saying.
I was never on the bandwagon, I'm a fan but I hold him to the same standard as I do other boxers. Something that lacks with a lot of Cotto fanatics.Comment
-
That's like saying Ward is ducking Kovalev. They're in their division, till they move up and establish themselves in the division, then they can be called ducks(Ward/GGG).
You should put the same standards for Cotto if that's the case with asterisks/conditions. Just saying.
I was never on the bandwagon, I'm a fan but I hold him to the same standard as I do other boxers. Something that lacks with a lot of Cotto fanatics.Last edited by Beater_of_ass; 07-28-2015, 07:12 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
The only standard I have is if a fighter says he takes more money, he'll always take more money. That's what Cotto says and he's always stated that. I'm not sure what GGG wants. He wants to unify but then is willing to move up. He would have made more money with Ward than Lemiux so it looks like nothing but a duck to me.But hey, this seems like your standard.
How is he ducking them if he doesn't fight at 168.Comment
Comment