No it doesn't. it shows how highly you rate his opponent.
He fought marquee names each time you ****** if only Brook fought the same names and we'd see if he was the favourite. Maybe now but not at the time Khan fought him as Brook was doing it the hard boy fighting nobodies.
Yes. I'm open minded, if my point was factually proven to be wrong, I won't continue to argue for the sake of pride.
Your point was proven wrong by the poster with the betting odds. He's always been the favourite, hence he wasn't "supposed to lose so many times before".
Your point was proven wrong by the poster with the betting odds. He's always been the favourite, hence he wasn't "supposed to lose so many times before".
Err...I kind of did admit that with the "yes". You asked a question and I answered it with yes at the start of my reply. Chill out.
What did all those other names against whom Khan was a favorite got to do with a thread titled: Khan vs Porter?
Erm.....Can you actually read? A poster said he was supposed to have lost many times before, and the odds for a few of his fights were posted to discredit that claim.
Tweet
if only Brook fought the same names and we'd see if he was the favourite. Maybe now but not at the time Khan fought him as Brook was doing it the hard boy fighting nobodies.
Comment