Comments Thread For: Joshua Gives Fury 40% Chance To Shock Klitschko

[Elroy1]

I am giving Fury a 60 percent chance of getting KO"D within seven rounds and a 30 percent chance of being KO'd in rounds 8-12.

^THIS

And I give big james scenario a 95% accuracy compared to 5% for Joshua's!

[yoz]

I am giving Fury a 60 percent chance of getting KO"D within seven rounds and a 30 percent chance of being KO'd in rounds 8-12.

[Robbie Barrett]

More like 4% chance.

[vorgaphe]

Yeah war Fury!!!

I think it'll be a short night though, but explosive while it lasts.

If Fury surprises, I think he could only win on points...

Biggest problem for Fury is...

Wladimir has never ever been knocked out by someone as light hitting as Fury

AND

Wladimir has never ever been worn down by accumulation of punches in any fight,

AND

Wladimir has never lost more than 2 rounds in any fight.

Altogether unless Tyson Fury proves to be by far the best opponent Wladimir has ever faced and then some, the "40%" chance Joshua is giving his fellow countryman is nothing but British propaganda.

I think Fury is a 10-1 shot, 5-1 at absolute best. It would not be out of the question though to have Fury at betting odds 20-1 really.

In the words of Howard Cosell..

I just don't think he can do it.

But we all know what happened when Howard said that don't we

That's total rubbish. He lost 4 against Jennings and lost plenty vs Peter too.

[removed]

lmfao.

As as well as claiming that Wladimir has never legitimately lost a fight, Elroy is also claiming that he's never lost more than 2 rounds in a fight?

These Klitlickers man, f'kin crazy.

[KnockoutNed]

Wladimir has never ever been worn down by accumulation of punches in any fight,

Worn down and KO'd by bum Purrity.

Brewster pushed him for 3 minutes of every round. Wlad couldn't even make it past 5

Wladimir has never lost more than 2 rounds in any fight.

Williamson ahead on judge's scorecard before making Wlad quit

Brock swept the first 4 rounds

unskilled clubber Peter won 3-5 rounds

Janitor Jennings arguably won as many as 5 rounds

[LacedUp]

lmfao.

As as well as claiming that Wladimir has never legitimately lost a fight, Elroy is also claiming that he's never lost more than 2 rounds in a fight?

These Klitlickers man, f'kin crazy.

he's obviously a troll who knows nothing about boxing.

[Elroy1]

Ok so I realised I confused Wladimir with Vitali on the 2 rounds issue.

But still, the guy hardly ever loses rounds, whole career.

Still though, one guy here tried to grab hold of the ball and simply run too far with it..............

Worn down and KO'd by bum Purrity.

He was not worn down by Puritty at all! He overpaced himself and gassed. He wore HIMESELF out punching Puritty! Puritty was a bum, yes, but he was one tough and one powerful bum.

Brewster pushed him for 3 minutes of every round. Wlad couldn't even make it past 5

Brewster was nothing other than a complete punching bag in that fight for which Wladimir was suffering an emergency medical condition, obviously.

Williamson ahead on judge's scorecard before making Wlad quit

Williams was obviously NOT ahead on the cards otherwise he would have won the fight. More accurately you are referring that ONE judge had Williams ahead, not collectively.

Brock swept the first 4 rounds

Brock fought very well but this is a flat out lie, the judges gave almost all rounds to Wlad.

unskilled clubber Peter won 3-5 rounds

Fearsome puncher Peter won some rounds on the strength of his savage knockdowns which hard chinned and brave Wladimir got up from to WIN.

Janitor Jennings arguably won as many as 5 rounds

MECHANIC and previously undefeated professional boxer of exquisite condition Jennings won rounds against Klitschko, but not 5! He arguably could have LOST more rounds too!

[LacedUp]

Ok so I realised I confused Wladimir with Vitali on the 2 rounds issue.

Vitali lost 3 rounds against Chisora on one judges card, and 3-4 on many on press row.

[Elroy1]

Vitali lost 3 rounds against Chisora on one judges card, and 3-4 on many on press row.

Yes yes, there will be the odd judge and outsider who sees it differently of course.

But basically when your talking about fighting a Klitschko you are talking about fighting guys who not only hardly ever lose, but also guys who have hardly ever lost any rounds and hardly ever even get hit!

Let's not pretend it's otherwise.

Tyson Fury would be a fool if he did not understand the reality of the task he is up against here. Lets keep on topic.