Who will be Kell Brook's next opponent?
Collapse
-
-
Brook will have trouble getting these guys to the UK. But I genuinely believe he beats ANY welterweight other than Floyd. He knocks out Thurman and any other hype job you can think of. Time will tell.Comment
-
Because they're better than 99% of his former opponents.. It's not too difficult to grasp.. lolComment
-
This is the new line from the Khantards. "Deffering is not ducking".The fight will be bigger next year. Deferring is different than ducking. Why should Khan take all the wear and tear while Brook fights Jo Jo Dans and Frankie Gavins all so he cash out and get that Amir Khan pay day?
If Khan is ducking then Brook's next opponent speaks volumes about him.
So why did you already admit that Khan was ducking Brook?
Cox-Orifice is very confused.Comment
-
That's exactly what it is. Khan throws 2 random names out in sheer desperation after getting grilled for his cowardice and his worshippers cling onto it. Hearn already laughed off the idea of Bundu or Van Heerden.Very true.
There's no place in this world for a Bundu or Van Heerden fight. none of which are ranked with the IBF so obviously neither will happen.
It's just Khan throwing some names out there trying to troll. And his girly fans stick to it like every other thing that comes out of Khan's mouth.Comment
-
I never said only. I said fans from Pakistan are likely to follow Khan over every other boxer. Is that true or false?Ummm the fact that only people of Khan's background support him. All so you could discredit the opposition's arguments. Lame.
I'm not implying you're racist btw. I actually look forward to use you as my nsb punching bag. Take that as a compliment.
Khan's next opponent will say it all.
Punching bag? Please.
Well I've seen you downplay Brook's world title time after time. But it matters when Alexander fought an age old world champ not even ranked in the top 10 and decades removed from his prime?I'm saying Alexander fought Bailey because that was the guy in his division holding a World title. Did I say it doesn't matter? Strawman much?
Why the hell does it matter how many punches he threw? We all know all it takes is one shot from Bailey? He is the original One Time.
Also we're talking Alexander here. Alexander won it off a champion. You're just reaching for straws talking about Bailey winning it as vacant. This is on par with your lame argument about being WW champ is more prestigious than LWW. I mean if WBC becomes vacant and Khan wins are you gonna preach this same non-sense?
He won the fight in Jan. He wasn't there in Feb, March, April and all of a sudden he shows up at #13 in........May. Feb,March and April are not couple of months by any mathematical stretch and also why would it take even couple of months as you put it to update their rankings?
Frankie Gavin was a...........
Being WW champ is undoubtedly more prestigious than being LWW champ. That is just a fact.
Ok - And which fighters in the IBF rankings lost in that time period? Have you checked that?
And you're talking as if moving to #13 is some slimeball move. Khan was moved to #1 by WBC when he didn't even fight anyone ranked in their org . Now THAT is slimey.
Frankie Gavin has never fought at LWW, unlike Diaz, Alexander, Molina & Algieri 4/5 of Khan's last "WW opponents".Comment
-
Can a Khantard reply to this gentleman who kindly broke it down for everyone else.My problem is he thinks him and Brook are like Mayweather and Pacquiao. He is trying to copy what Mayweather did with pacquiao but he's not as smart as Mayweather to carry it off. He's doing it in plain sight of everyone. He's openly saying he doesn't want to fight him, then he's saying he does, then he picks his resume apart which he has a point with then he's saying the fight can generate more if we wait. He's just too honest and too dumb. That's why he's getting pelters.
Khant fans complain that Brook only fights bums but support that he refuses to fight Brook. Where the hell is the logic in that?!?Comment
-
Comment
Comment