Comments Thread For: WBA Orders Scoring Review of Perez-Crolla Decision

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: WBA Orders Scoring Review of Perez-Crolla Decision

    Manchester Arena (formerly M.E.N Arena), Manchester, Lancashire - WBA Vice President Gilberto Jesus Mendoza has ordered an official scoring review of Saturday’s championship fight in Manchester, England between WBA World lightweight champion Darleys Perez and Anthony Crolla.

    The Pod Index will conduct the review on behalf of the WBA and will utilize ten judges—five judges will score it using the full point system and five will have the option to use half points.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • glenn mcrory
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2014
    • 1784
    • 169
    • 106
    • 22,671

    #2
    Hey let's do a review of the Burns-Beltran scorecards while we're at it.
    #fatbritishwallets

    Comment

    • knockoutkid
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2010
      • 1957
      • 46
      • 9
      • 11,429

      #3
      crolla held his head down thats why he threw low blows.

      Comment

      • ShoulderRoll
        Join The Great Resist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 56172
        • 10,136
        • 5,032
        • 763,445

        #4
        Originally posted by glenn mcrory
        Hey let's do a review of the Burns-Beltran scorecards while we're at it.
        #fatbritishwallets
        Sad but true.

        Comment

        • jas
          Voice of Reason
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 22522
          • 936
          • 912
          • 1,059,614

          #5
          lol at this........

          what a disgrace

          im embarrassed for british boxing

          its so corrupt

          that last point deduction and the commentary was embarrassing.

          i did think crolla clearly won but the referee howard foster was a disgrace as usual and the commentary and punditry bias was absurd

          Comment

          • danktrees
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2005
            • 371
            • 32
            • 1
            • 7,079

            #6
            what's the point the review? even if they find it in favour of one guy or the other it makes zero difference. the belt doesnt change hands nor does the official result change. go waste money on something else...make the belt look nicer or something.

            Comment

            • Mick Higgs
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2012
              • 4541
              • 217
              • 122
              • 27,255

              #7
              danktrees: Apart from the ring magazine all these so called World title belts look tacky. "Long live the Lonsdale belt"!

              Comment

              • jas
                Voice of Reason
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 22522
                • 936
                • 912
                • 1,059,614

                #8
                Originally posted by danktrees
                what's the point the review? even if they find it in favour of one guy or the other it makes zero difference. the belt doesnt change hands nor does the official result change. go waste money on something else...make the belt look nicer or something.
                the point is they get an immediate rematch

                Comment

                • soul_survivor
                  LOL @ Ali-Holmes
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 18949
                  • 623
                  • 473
                  • 65,236

                  #9
                  I felt Perez won the fight 7-5, at best it was 6-6 and obviously the point deductions would have gotten us a draw with the former (so I agreed with the overall result of the night) or a Crolla win with the latter.

                  I didn't much care for either guy in the fight, Perez didn't fight like a champion and Crolla came forward but fought in spurts of activity, which can't win you a championship belt.

                  The scorecard that really miffed me with the 116-111 in favour of crolla...wth?

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP