Comments Thread For: J. Mayweather: Pacquiao's Story Backfired, No Rematch!
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Whenever HBO has known a fighter has an injury they mention it on air. They have always met their responsibility in this area. Lack of direct acknowledgement isn't proof, but given how HBO has conducted their fights for years, it is a glaring omission. They also are on record as saying they knew nothing of an injury.
I think Bob did something similar to what he did when he had Manny get stitches (from his future son in law, a plastic surgeon) he didn't need 6-8 weeks after the cut in the JMM fight.
He did this after saying Manny was available for May but after the judge in Nevada allowed Floyd to delay going to jail so he could fight in May.Comment
-
Wow man your childish posts are amusing. Keep sucking off mayweather bro keep it classy.Comment
-
It's exactly the same thing that happened in Pac-Marquez 4!
By round 6 Pacs shoulder had let him down again.
Everything starts and finishes at the shoulder, not your brain!!!
You cannot make decisions without your shoulder!
p.s Singsurat, Morales, Bradley you could clearly see it came down to Pacs shoulder being the only reason.
G T F O!!!!!Comment
-
Oh this post is gold. It's like saying because Pacquiao lost other fights unrelated to his shoulder the shoulder can never be a factor in future fights. Da fuq sense does that make? His shoulder could only have been a problem in this fight if it was a problem his whole career?It's exactly the same thing that happened in Pac-Marquez 4!
By round 6 Pacs shoulder had let him down again.
Everything starts and finishes at the shoulder, not your brain!!!
You cannot make decisions without your shoulder!
p.s Singsurat, Morales, Bradley you could clearly see it came down to Pacs shoulder being the only reason.
G T F O!!!!!Comment
-
Wai wait hold up!It's exactly the same thing that happened in Pac-Marquez 4!
By round 6 Pacs shoulder had let him down again.
Everything starts and finishes at the shoulder, not your brain!!!
You cannot make decisions without your shoulder!
p.s Singsurat, Morales, Bradley you could clearly see it came down to Pacs shoulder being the only reason.
G T F O!!!!!
I thought it was the socks for the morales fight? Or was it the bloodComment
-
He lost the fights to Morales and Singsurat legitimately. Bradley was widely considered a highway robbery, though it was a close fight in my personal opinion (I had scored it 7-5 Pac).
Let's stay on topic folks.Comment
-
The surgery is direct proof that he wasn't 100% in that fight. When it occurred and when it was aggravated means little to nothing if he wasn't at his best and managed to stun Floyd on a couple of occasions and took rounds off him still. He was hurt and most likely lost because of it, live with it.WHen? I have not seen that. DO you have a link or did you hear this from another poster?
Freddie mentioned something at the presser but Bob corrected him when he said that. We do not hear everything between rounds, true. But HBO, which didn't know of any shoulder injury, surely would have made it known had roach mentioned it.
I am sure if this were any fighter other than Manny you and others would clearly understand the points being made.
If you believe the surgery is proof of an injury during the fight, so be it.Comment
-
2 of the 3 judges scored the fight 8-4. There were a few close rounds so in no way is that a schooling. Your nut huggery will not change that.Comment
.....and 10-2 was the correct score, one of the judges who originally scored it 8-4 admitted it was after the fight. no need for a rematch because floyd proved he was superior and the greatest fighter of this era.
Comment