Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Team Lomachenko To Rigondeaux: 126 or No Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    catch weights SUCK. They need to trim Divisions down to maybe 10: Straweight, 112, 118, 126, 135, 147, 160, 175, cruiser and Heavy..none of this super or "Jr" bull****..

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Dean_Razorback View Post
      i don't, but all those who were trashing certain fighter a few days ago for asking for a CW are now behind rigo in this one
      Are you really keeping track of people who criticized "A" fighter and are now standing behind Rigo? I cant be bothered with all that. I know I see a couple who criticized "A" fighter for a cw but the only thing they're ok with is the rehydration clause. I said **** the cw and on the fence about the rehydration clause.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Unseen View Post
        Make it 124 but no rehydration clause. That would be meeting in the middle.
        Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
        126 with rehydration clause. Wouldn't want him to be 10-12 pounds heavier. Right loma fans?
        Originally posted by PRchamp View Post
        Didn't Lomo pull the same stunt on Walters??

        I didn't hear a peep since he would be fighting a bigger featherweight like Walters but it's cool for Lomo to blow up to 140 against other smaller fighters?

        Even if Rigo fights Lomo at 126. Arum won't make it happen, top rank is dead man they don't have anybody. All we will see Lomo fight is nothing but bums on PPV undercards on Latin fury and hear Arum talk like Lomochenko is the next Mayweather haha
        Originally posted by W1LLPARK3R View Post
        Hope Loma takes the 135 rehydration clause..I think hed be too young and big for Rigo..
        Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::. View Post
        That was exactly the point of HandzBooger's and mine. Loma refused to fight Walters cause Walters is "too big". So, he should understand how Rigo feels and agree to the rehydration clause, right?
        Originally posted by lazaron72 View Post
        Loma ducked Walters cause Walters in his las fight made 127 , Loma got beat by salido and he cried that salido was to big ... Ha ha . Now he wants the tiny , small , rigo to go up ??? Ha ha .
        Ok , rigo should take it at 126 for lomas title , but Loma shouldn't weight more than 10 pounds , fight night .... Fear right ??
        Or they should have the weight in the same day of the fight , like in the Olympics games ... Both are olimpics right ? They are used to that .

        My man rigo will beat , Loma , at 122 or 126 , all the way .....

        Loma , Walters say he wants to fight you , but you are crying for just one pound ...ha ha ha .

        Go rigo , fight at 126 and beat him .... Salido knows how ...

        Hit and not be hit ; can not hit what you don't see .
        Originally posted by Cuban Linx View Post
        126 with a rehydration clause seems the most fair. If you're worried about Lomachenko blowing up after making weight then I think it's fair to ask for that. That doesn't seem like it would be a big deal especially if it's only like 10 lbs. But I think asking him to cut the extra 2 lbs on top of that is pushing it.
        If Rigo cant put on 4 extra lbs and feel confident he dont need to fight High Tech!!!!

        Comment


        • #54
          Still looking for a quote from Rigo lol
          He's trying to leave Gary Hyde and Gary Hyde is the one volunteering Rigo for this stuff?
          I'm dubious
          Also, the Pres of Caribe was saying last year that Rigo was ready for all the champs at 126

          Comment


          • #55
            this is actually one of those cases where u have actually fightin at a division that he cannot rehydrate pass actually askin for a weight stipulation...i would like if rigo goes down in weight and becomes a 2 or 3 time champ..i know he can make 115...if not they will keep him out of the hall of fame..screw lomo, but rigo wants the money fights..he should get with al haymon and trust that al haymon will get him those at any weight..

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by King_ View Post
              Exactly. The double-standards and hypocrisy on this forum is ridiculous. But since Rigo is the most overrated dude on this forum in the past 10 years, its OKAY to not criticize him.



              http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=629046

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by i'm a fun haver View Post
                Still looking for a quote from Rigo lol
                He's trying to leave Gary Hyde and Gary Hyde is the one volunteering Rigo for this stuff?
                I'm dubious
                that is a good point..some ppl talk at the wrong time just to seem relevant..boxing is so confusing..

                Comment


                • #58
                  I see no problem with that thread. If Lomachenko beats Rigo, and unifies all titles at 126... by his 10th or so fight.... He would literally be on GOAT-pace. Do you disagree?

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    so much for that fight not happening 124 actually makes sense for this fight how about 122 or no fight chenko?

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by King_ View Post
                      I see no problem with that thread. If Lomachenko beats Rigo, and unifies all titles at 126... by his 10th or so fight.... He would literally be on GOAT-pace. Do you disagree?
                      Lol..........

                      I find it hilarious that a post ago you said Rigo was the most overrated guy on here only to follow up with this. Sad thing is, I seriously think you're being serious and not trolling.

                      I nean, you just said Rigo is overrated so how does beating him put Loma on GOAT-pace? Some people dont think before posting.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP