khan's performance vs collazo was 100X better

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KayDub
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 835
    • 61
    • 2
    • 15,097

    #21
    Originally posted by king4oranges
    Khan's performance against collazo was way better than thurmans performance . Khan absolutely destroyed collazo and embarrassed him while thurman couldn't do the same. Thurman won convincingly but his performance wasn't up to par with khans.
    Cool. Now make a thread about Julio Diaz.

    Comment

    • alexguiness
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2012
      • 8169
      • 396
      • 44
      • 50,607

      #22
      Khan's style is better suited to fighting Collazo, he is quicker on his feet and use his jab a lot more.

      Thurman needs to stop loading up and improve his foot speed.

      I'd still take Thurman to KO Khan.

      Comment

      • -Antonio-
        -Antonio-
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2005
        • 24259
        • 629
        • 163
        • 38,153

        #23
        Who cares? Mosley beat up Collazo and knocked him down if I recall nearly 10 years ago.

        Are we really talking about who beat Collazo better? That's what the ww division has come to? This fight was a joke and I skipped it for a much better UFC card.

        Comment

        • HanzGruber
          STRAPMEUP
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2011
          • 29824
          • 1,069
          • 238
          • 81,632

          #24
          Southpaws are Taylor made for khan

          Comment

          • Weebler I
            El Weeblerito I
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 31113
            • 1,468
            • 1,648
            • 54,550

            #25
            Originally posted by boliodogs
            I think saying Khan's performance was 100 times better is an exaggeration but I would expect nothing less from such a totally devoted Khan fan. I think Kahn's performance was much better than Thurman's performance. Khan was never hurt and he never ran away from Collazo. He took the fight to Collazo and dominated him. He knocked Collazo down in the 4th and twice in the 10th while Thurman failed to knock Collazo down even once. Thurman was clearly hurt by the body punch and forced to hold and run. Yep, Khan definitely won the Collazo stomping contest. Now it's time for Khan to man up and tell Haymon that if he doesn't get the Mayweather fight he wants to fight Thurman asap.
            Broadly agree with your post, Khan did the better job overall, but Khan did move (or run) once Collazo dropped his hands and started walking him down.

            Comment

            • SalimShady1212
              Head Of Team Matthysse
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2015
              • 3972
              • 156
              • 488
              • 11,485

              #26
              How many times, triangle theories don't work. I use the same example every time, Ali;Foreman and Frazier.

              Comment

              • Crazylegs77
                null and void
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2008
                • 13101
                • 445
                • 296
                • 21,573

                #27
                Originally posted by bigjavi973
                No it wasn't. LMAO all he did was hold & hit throughout the fight.
                Exactly this.

                Comment

                • sicko
                  The Truth Hurts
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 34211
                  • 2,594
                  • 839
                  • 151,307

                  #28
                  We don't have to judge by Common Opponents...Make Thurman vs Khan and lets find out who better! My money is on Thurman to leave Khan Flat. Khan don't have Collazo, Bundu or Guerrero Chin

                  Comment

                  • Jc8804
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 6231
                    • 394
                    • 143
                    • 30,652

                    #29
                    Same can be said in maidana vs alexander
                    For floyd.

                    Same can be said In baldomir vs zab for floyd

                    Same can be said in collazo vs ortiz for floyd

                    Just saying

                    Comment

                    • SalimShady1212
                      Head Of Team Matthysse
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2015
                      • 3972
                      • 156
                      • 488
                      • 11,485

                      #30
                      Originally posted by sicko
                      We don't have to judge by Common Opponents...Make Thurman vs Khan and lets find out who better! My money is on Thurman to leave Khan Flat. Khan don't have Collazo, Bundu or Guerrero Chin
                      Guerrero was out on his feet and go dropped by a guy with 4 KO's last month...Bundu has never fought above European level. Collazo was dropped 3 times doe. My money's on Khan and we can make a bet if it happens.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP