khan's performance vs collazo was 100X better
Collapse
-
Khan's style is better suited to fighting Collazo, he is quicker on his feet and use his jab a lot more.
Thurman needs to stop loading up and improve his foot speed.
I'd still take Thurman to KO Khan.Comment
-
Who cares? Mosley beat up Collazo and knocked him down if I recall nearly 10 years ago.
Are we really talking about who beat Collazo better? That's what the ww division has come to? This fight was a joke and I skipped it for a much better UFC card.Comment
-
-
Broadly agree with your post, Khan did the better job overall, but Khan did move (or run) once Collazo dropped his hands and started walking him down.I think saying Khan's performance was 100 times better is an exaggeration but I would expect nothing less from such a totally devoted Khan fan. I think Kahn's performance was much better than Thurman's performance. Khan was never hurt and he never ran away from Collazo. He took the fight to Collazo and dominated him. He knocked Collazo down in the 4th and twice in the 10th while Thurman failed to knock Collazo down even once. Thurman was clearly hurt by the body punch and forced to hold and run. Yep, Khan definitely won the Collazo stomping contest. Now it's time for Khan to man up and tell Haymon that if he doesn't get the Mayweather fight he wants to fight Thurman asap.Comment
-
How many times, triangle theories don't work. I use the same example every time, Ali;Foreman and Frazier.Comment
-
Comment
-
Guerrero was out on his feet and go dropped by a guy with 4 KO's last month...Bundu has never fought above European level. Collazo was dropped 3 times doe. My money's on Khan and we can make a bet if it happens.Comment
Comment