Thomas Hearns vs Amir Khan. Who Wins? Why?

[Elroy1]

It's what those of us with intellect call sarcasm.

Haven't you got a KKK meeting to attend?

Thank god for that!

Who knows what a sick ass hole like you thinks really!

And look at that, I'm a racist now am I?

Your powers of observation do you about as much credit as your pathetic sarcasm!

[Thread Stealer]

Khan wins due to his amazing technical skills, Whitaker-esque defense, educated and accurate combinations, genius ring IQ, Toney-esque in-fighting and counterpunching, and his Mavrovic-like granite chin.

[BrometheusBob.]

I know you hate Khan but is this neccessary? You might as well ask who wins between Prime Roy Jones Jr and Julio Cesar Chavez Jr.

I think that question would be less ridiculous honestly.

[Rockin']

If this fight had ever come off Hearns would be sitting in jail for murder and Howard Cosells grand kids would be so traumatized by witnessing the match up that they would quit watching boxing too.

[bowl]

Hearns would turn Khan's face inside out.

[////]

easy ud for khan

[stefl14]

If Khan made it out of round 1, it would be a massive upset. And when I say that, I am referring to current Hearns of course. If it's Khan vs prime Hearns, then Khan gets killed by the first jab Hearns throws and Hearns retires out of guilt.

[Elroy1]

Enough of this garbage!

Now I picked Hearns myself, but there is still a considerable amount of nutbaggery flowing through this thread!

First of all is these whoppers like Khan wouldn't make it out of round 1! Now it's of course possible that that could happen, but it's OBVIOUSLY not LIKELY to happen.

Pull up Thomas Hearns record and ACTUALLY CHECK how many opponents Hearns really DID knock out in the first round..

Not a great many!

Now Khan is a top boxer in the year 2015 and even just a quick look at a picture of him shows he is fitter than any boxer of Hearn's era and a quick look at him train and fight shows he is also faster than any and better skilled than most of them too.

So are you claiming that Khan is WORSE than all of Hearns opponents too that he failed to KO in 1 round??

Not a likely story is it!!

And a quick look at these opponents reveals quickly that MOST of the guys Hearns to failed to KO in 1 round, and some of them he failed to KO even at all, were much ****ter than Khan!!

The OTHER bungle here with analysis, is how you take a young boxer like Khan and compare him to a whole career fighter like Hearns who fought through to an age much older than current Khan. It is OBVIOUS that the older the fighter, the more fights and more experience and it is also OBVIOUS that boxers get heftier the older they get!

It doesn't make sense to compare current Khan at his weight range to any version of Hearn's that was much older, in a different stage of his career that Khan hasn't even reached yet and in far heftier weight classes too which Khan hasn't beefed up to yet either!

You should only really compare upto LMW Hearns at the most and disregard anything he did later.

I would also like to finish by pointing out that Hearns couldn't handle a really good fighter at MW like Hagler.

And he never really beat anybody that significant from Welter to MW either besides Duran and Benitez who were not especially better than Khan.

[alexguiness]

Khan and Hearns should not be mentioned in the same sentence.

These types of posts are ******ed IMO.

Hearns is an ATG one of the very best MW's ever. Khan is an average WW who had some success at LWW (for a short time against weak opposition)

What next, Paulie Malignaggi VS Marvin Hager?

GTFOH will this fanboy BS.

Peace out.

[HEND]

I'm just here to laugh at the guys who voted for Khan. I thought it will be just Frankie Bruno, Flatline and soul survivor because those three guys would pick Khan even against a prime Mikey Tyson but as I see there are 5 other smart guys (or trolls) who voted for Khan.
For the record: Maybe I shouldn't even say it but Khan has absolutely no chance against a prime Thomas Hearns. Not at all. Not even a little, not even a lucky punch.