Stop the madness with these catchweights.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Promoter: We'd Fight Ward at 164, 50-50 Split
Collapse
-
Fact is your the only being bias for triple G when he was moving up the full 8lbs to fight those guys but ward has to be 164 Dawson said he will go down ward didn't ask him post fight Hopkins he said it ward took him up on offer don't mention something then try and use it as excuse for losing Dawson can control what comes out his mouth he said it ward said 160 over two years ago for Floyd dream fight like triple G saying 154 for dream fight with Floyd cut the bs his team trying duck wardComment
-
-
Cotto canelo is for the middleweight title thats why it gets heat. If it was a regular fight no one woyld blink twice. Ggg is currently chasing big fish while ward has non by moving to a full 168 he is giving up hope if any at a floyd shot And risking not making catchweight in the high 150's for a canelo cotto match.Comment
-
On a network that had never aired boxing, while competing directly against a notable fight in a primetime broadcast, on national TV.
context is a mother****erComment
-
Truth is, this is a "fair" offer. However, the fact that GGG said he would fight Chavez Jr. and Froch @ 168, makes GGG look scared of Ward's power. It's a PR problem, but the "50/50" is intriguing. If I'm Ward, I give him the 164, and counter with 60/40(Ward). Ward did beat Froch already, and GGG beat...well nobody.Comment
-
For all the talk from K2 claiming that Golovkin is "clearly the bigger star", that's about the number that he would need to draw to justify the point, since Ward likely drew $750k at Oracle for the Smith fight (once a count gets disclosed).
I sincerely doubt that Golovkin-Monroe Jr did anywhere near $1m, therefore K2's 'A-side' talk is bull****.
threw the number out for effectComment
-
Don't try and meet in middle for ward but go all the way up for froch and Chavez jr they admitting fear asking for that when froch and Chavez bigger and stronger then wardLast edited by SchoolTheseCats; 07-08-2015, 07:59 PM.Comment
Comment