Wladimir Klitschko's best undefeated opponent win?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43736
    • 4,673
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #11
    Originally posted by juggernaut666
    Peter never really knocked wlad down,one was a push and the other was a shove after a punch to the back of wlads head........never really landed a clean knockdown.Wach was his best performance while Povetkin was the best fighter,that he TOYED with.The over exaggeration to discredit Wlad has become comical.Not sure what you mean by "0" im assuming win?If Wlad hits fury like he did Wach,its not going past 4/5 rounds.Also watching the Jennings fight ,he used superior footwork,easily side stepping him like a matador and a bull....where is this guy slowing down?Excessive holding/I would say maybe however,it was a good showing of overall skill....Jennings is not easy to fight,wlad made him look like an amateur controlling the fight with a simple jab.I agree with you wlad is one of the best fighters of all time.Take away his European status he would be hailed and not criticized.
    he cheated with

    yea maybeeee 187 clinches is a lil excessive...maybe

    Comment

    • beez721
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2005
      • 9637
      • 252
      • 55
      • 16,400

      #12
      performance wise Id go with chageav. he was almost flawless in that fight. peter was probably his best win as he was at a low point then and a solid underdog but showed heart and got the win. as crude as peter was he had enormous strength and a granite chin. that wlad fight ruined him

      Comment

      • daggum
        All time great
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 43736
        • 4,673
        • 3
        • 166,270

        #13
        Originally posted by beez721
        performance wise Id go with chageav. he was almost flawless in that fight. peter was probably his best win as he was at a low point then and a solid underdog but showed heart and got the win. as crude as peter was he had enormous strength and a granite chin. that wlad fight ruined him
        he had the best wins of his career after losing the first wlad fight.

        Comment

        • !! Shawn
          !! Shown
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 9810
          • 670
          • 724
          • 31,455

          #14
          Peter as most important win of his career.

          Povetkin as most important legacy wise, as Povetkin is the clear 2nd best of the generation outside Vitali of course, and former olympic gold medalist, etc...

          Chagaev as far as his master class look at me I'm dominating everyone performance.

          Comment

          • beez721
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2005
            • 9637
            • 252
            • 55
            • 16,400

            #15
            Originally posted by daggum
            he had the best wins of his career after losing the first wlad fight.
            yea,,,,but his punch resistance wasnt the same

            Comment

            • Enzo Mc is SHIT
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 3947
              • 168
              • 1
              • 17,498

              #16
              I'm saying Pulev because Povetkin was so terrible against him. If he'd beat the Povetkin who's looked so monstrous in his last couple of fights I'd regard that win more highly.

              Comment

              • VirusTI
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 726
                • 37
                • 2
                • 16,779

                #17
                povetkin, but that was a bull**** fight. I'd take povetkin by KO in a rematch with fair ref

                Comment

                • beez721
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 9637
                  • 252
                  • 55
                  • 16,400

                  #18
                  Originally posted by VirusTI
                  povetkin, but that was a bull**** fight. I'd take povetkin by KO in a rematch with fair ref
                  I think wlad may have knocked povetkin out if the ref forced him to fight instead of all the clinching. he was hurting povetkin almost at will

                  Comment

                  • The Hammer
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 50797
                    • 3,416
                    • 8,704
                    • 58,851

                    #19
                    Originally posted by juggernaut666
                    Peter never really knocked wlad down,one was a push and the other was a shove after a punch to the back of wlads head........never really landed a clean knockdown.Wach was his best performance while Povetkin was the best fighter,that he TOYED with.The over exaggeration to discredit Wlad has become comical.Not sure what you mean by "0" im assuming win?If Wlad hits fury like he did Wach,its not going past 4/5 rounds.Also watching the Jennings fight ,he used superior footwork,easily side stepping him like a matador and a bull....where is this guy slowing down?Excessive holding/I would say maybe however,it was a good showing of overall skill....Jennings is not easy to fight,wlad made him look like an amateur controlling the fight with a simple jab.I agree with you wlad is one of the best fighters of all time.Take away his European status he would be hailed and not criticized.
                    By "0" I just meant undefeated opponent.

                    As in 'someone's "0" has got to go'

                    Comment

                    • BWC
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2015
                      • 2710
                      • 51
                      • 1
                      • 19,165

                      #20
                      Originally posted by daggum
                      that doesn't mean peter was any good. he hadn't fought a soul at that point. even wilder's resume is better than peter's was. the reason people picked peter was because wlad was getting knocked all over the ring every fight. what people didn't realize was that wlad was developing his clinch every time opponent gets close enough to punch him strategy which has paid off ever since.
                      Wlad's career was in a tailspin when he fought Peter. It looked like he might be a gatekeeper at best, a can at worst.

                      That's when he brought on Manny, developed his legendary jab and clinch game, and the rest is history.

                      I put Peter as Wlad's best win not because it was his toughest boxing fight, but because his whole career was on the line at that point..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP