Wladimir Klitschko's best undefeated opponent win?
Collapse
-
performance wise Id go with chageav. he was almost flawless in that fight. peter was probably his best win as he was at a low point then and a solid underdog but showed heart and got the win. as crude as peter was he had enormous strength and a granite chin. that wlad fight ruined himComment
-
he had the best wins of his career after losing the first wlad fight.performance wise Id go with chageav. he was almost flawless in that fight. peter was probably his best win as he was at a low point then and a solid underdog but showed heart and got the win. as crude as peter was he had enormous strength and a granite chin. that wlad fight ruined himComment
-
Peter as most important win of his career.
Povetkin as most important legacy wise, as Povetkin is the clear 2nd best of the generation outside Vitali of course, and former olympic gold medalist, etc...
Chagaev as far as his master class look at me I'm dominating everyone performance.Comment
-
I'm saying Pulev because Povetkin was so terrible against him. If he'd beat the Povetkin who's looked so monstrous in his last couple of fights I'd regard that win more highly.Comment
-
Comment
-
By "0" I just meant undefeated opponent.Peter never really knocked wlad down,one was a push and the other was a shove after a punch to the back of wlads head........never really landed a clean knockdown.Wach was his best performance while Povetkin was the best fighter,that he TOYED with.The over exaggeration to discredit Wlad has become comical.Not sure what you mean by "0" im assuming win?If Wlad hits fury like he did Wach,its not going past 4/5 rounds.Also watching the Jennings fight ,he used superior footwork,easily side stepping him like a matador and a bull....where is this guy slowing down?Excessive holding/I would say maybe however,it was a good showing of overall skill....Jennings is not easy to fight,wlad made him look like an amateur controlling the fight with a simple jab.I agree with you wlad is one of the best fighters of all time.Take away his European status he would be hailed and not criticized.
As in 'someone's "0" has got to go'Comment
-
Wlad's career was in a tailspin when he fought Peter. It looked like he might be a gatekeeper at best, a can at worst.that doesn't mean peter was any good. he hadn't fought a soul at that point. even wilder's resume is better than peter's was. the reason people picked peter was because wlad was getting knocked all over the ring every fight. what people didn't realize was that wlad was developing his clinch every time opponent gets close enough to punch him strategy which has paid off ever since.
That's when he brought on Manny, developed his legendary jab and clinch game, and the rest is history.
I put Peter as Wlad's best win not because it was his toughest boxing fight, but because his whole career was on the line at that point..Comment
Comment