Comments Thread For: Barry McGuigan Calls For Ban on Catch-Weight Fights

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Barry McGuigan Calls For Ban on Catch-Weight Fights

    Former champion and thriving boxing manager Barry McGuigan is calling for a ban on catch-weight fights. In recent years, catch-weights have really built up steam. This year alone, several key fights were based around catch-weights. Even the upcoming fall showdown between Saul "Canelo" Alvarez and Miguel Cotto will take place at a catch-weight of 155-pounds, which is one above the junior middleweight limit of 154.

    McGuigan feels catch-weights are usually in favor of the lighter fighter and crosses the line in providing one fighter with a significant advantage in the contest.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • i'm a fun haver
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2012
    • 2651
    • 87
    • 143
    • 9,236

    #2
    McGuigan is going to get Frampton kicked off of PBC before his first fight lol

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 48510
      • 4,809
      • 267
      • 104,043

      #3
      Good luck with that one, Barry.

      They've only been around forever and you I don't think you throwing your non existent influence around will make any difference.

      Comment

      • LacedUp
        Still Smokin'
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 29171
        • 781
        • 381
        • 132,163

        #4
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza
        Good luck with that one, Barry.

        They've only been around forever and you I don't think you throwing your non existent influence around will make any difference.
        I'm sure the #1 most visiting guest on Skysports's Ringside of 2010 has some pull.

        Comment

        • firstborn
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 2833
          • 80
          • 0
          • 11,435

          #5
          Good luck with that one, Barry.

          They've only been around forever and you I don't think you throwing your non existent influence around will make any difference.
          I don't see a problem with catchweights overall, just as long as they aren't fought for titles.

          Comment

          • Barcham
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2015
            • 4263
            • 158
            • 65
            • 11,189

            #6
            Anyone who disagrees with him is either an idiot or a Cotto apologist. Wait a minute... they're the same thing.

            Comment

            • soul_survivor
              LOL @ Ali-Holmes
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jun 2013
              • 18949
              • 623
              • 473
              • 65,236

              #7
              Originally posted by firstborn
              I don't see a problem with catchweights overall, just as long as they aren't fought for titles.
              Agreed! Or if they are, then a title fight between a guy moving up against a champion in the higher division.

              Comment

              • NEETzsche
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2011
                • 8389
                • 283
                • 176
                • 29,441

                #8
                there are catchweight fights and there are catchweight fights. cotto-alvarez at 155 lbs - cool; cotto-geale at 157 lbs - not cool.

                Comment

                • Chrismart
                  OK Jim...
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 14267
                  • 826
                  • 1,759
                  • 308,493

                  #9
                  I agree. Catchweights halfway between 2 divisions, when 2 top fighters are going to meet is fine.

                  When you have 2 guys in the same division fighting eachother and a catchweight is called..that's just silly.
                  Same deal when someone wants to challenge the other guys title. Fight at his weight or no title fight.

                  Comment

                  • Barcham
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2015
                    • 4263
                    • 158
                    • 65
                    • 11,189

                    #10
                    Originally posted by NEETzsche
                    there are catchweight fights and there are catchweight fights. cotto-alvarez at 155 lbs - cool; cotto-geale at 157 lbs - not cool.
                    Cotto - Alvarez at a catchweight is NOT cool. It is for the LINEAL MIDDLEWEIGHT TITLE and the fighters should be free to come in at any weight up to the 160 limit. They want to come in lower, no problem. But there should be nothing forcing that to happen. Can't defend your title against someone who weighs the maximum in your own division then it is time to vacate the title and drop back down. You do not belong there.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP