Comments Thread For: Mayweather Would Beat Golovkin at 154, Says Harrison

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sicko
    The Truth Hurts
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2010
    • 34211
    • 2,594
    • 839
    • 151,307

    #41
    Originally posted by SkillspayBills
    You're my homie, but we totally disagree on Harrison. He was getting pushed by a door to door vacuum salesman lol.
    LMFAO not to make any excuses for Harrison because he don't need one because Harrison got him out in 3 Rounds it wasn't really much of a match I was laughing the entire fight. But Pablo Munguia is so wild and awkward that he gives a lot of decent fighters troubles. I thought he beat Yudel Jhonson but lost by Split Decision and he just took Leonard Bundu the distance a couple of weeks ago

    You will see the best Harrison vs better competition

    Comment

    • StiffBlab
      Banned
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Jul 2015
      • 87
      • 5
      • 0
      • 176

      #42
      I think Floyd wins at any weight. Problem is it wouldn't be much fun to watch. Floyd running around sniping him as he comes in, GGG swinging at air.

      It would be a typical Floyd fight, except more running. He could outclass GGG all day though.

      Comment

      • aboutfkntime
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 47365
        • 1,631
        • 3,563
        • 391,308

        #43
        Originally posted by SkillspayBills
        Of course he would, no matter what GGG says he hasn't fought at that weight in over a decade.
        I doubt that Golovkin can even make 154.

        But if he did make the weight, no way would he be the same fighter, NO WAY !

        At 154, Golovkin would be vulnerable, not convinced at all that he could beat Canelo/Lara, or even guys like Andrade/Trout.

        He would be seriously depleted at 154.

        Comment

        • Reloaded
          Truth Teller
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 17097
          • 750
          • 16
          • 26,393

          #44
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime
          I doubt that Golovkin can even make 154.

          But if he did make the weight, no way would he be the same fighter, NO WAY !

          At 154, Golovkin would be vulnerable, not convinced at all that he could beat Canelo/Lara, or even guys like Andrade/Trout.

          He would be seriously depleted at 154.
          That's the whole point if Floyd won he would get no credit for it , there is no doubt it would be GGG was drained , so really if its not 160 forget it and Floyd is no MW and don't belong at MW with any MW .

          Comment

          • tjones1989
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2014
            • 1205
            • 45
            • 2
            • 29,172

            #45
            Forget that, fight GGG at 160. Floyd would get the most credit beating him there, but he ain't gonna do that.

            Comment

            • aboutfkntime
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 47365
              • 1,631
              • 3,563
              • 391,308

              #46
              Originally posted by Reloaded
              That's the whole point if Floyd won he would get no credit for it , there is no doubt it would be GGG was drained , so really if its not 160 forget it and Floyd is no MW and don't belong at MW with any MW .
              Any catchweight is a joke fight imho.

              Or perhaps, " exhibition match " would be a better term.

              9/10, a catchweight will benefit the smaller fighter.

              The result of any catchweight fight will be lack of clarity, confusion, excuses.

              And every time I hear a catchweight being mentioned, I have to wonder if that exhibition match is costing us a meaningful fight relating to divisional supremacy.

              The recent comment by McGuigan was ****-on imho, because there are only two reasons to demand a catchweight.

              You are either.....

              1) not good enough to compete with your opponent because of size disparity, so..... fcuk off back to your own division

              or.....

              2) you are attempting to drain your opponent in order to gain an unfair advantage, so..... fcuk off back to your own division

              1) catchweights are completely unnecessary, we have 17 divisions today

              2) they do not add value, they create uncertainly, lack-of-clarity, excuses

              They are rubbish, they demean the sport..... get rid of them, permanently.

              Comment

              • mathed
                molṑn labé
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 54549
                • 2,741
                • 2,984
                • 224,675

                #47
                All ya gotta do is MAKE IT HAPPEN!!

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP