Comments Thread For: Browne Taunts Wilder: Let's See if You've Got The Balls!
Collapse
-
-
What am I wrong about again?
And that was only one of the ******ed things he said. You're sticking up for Elroy now?
Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't have to stick up for anyone if I were to agree with you that would make me a dummy too,and a LIAR as well...I am neither that's your own boat you are in apparently...you even show quote from Elroy not saying Browne is taller than Wilder but stating he is one of the tallest you yourself just showed what a complete fool you are right there in your own post..you have yet to show where elroy stated Browne is taller than wilder...you cant b/c he never did....
Last edited by juggernaut666; 07-01-2015, 11:07 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
could be ....honestly don't see much from Browne but punchers chance... I don't think hes on a Wach level.....though i have Wach in my top 5 ,just because of his overall good technique and chin nand lasted with wlad...no one but Povetkin fought Wlad in my top 5.....at 6'8 250 plus hes a real Hw to me...browne is rough around the edges and ducks into punches when covering up,he also reacts to feints badly....he looks like a less adequate foreman to me.....elroy brings up good points on the other side...cant say its a given who would win,with a puncher like Browne I would take wilder right now...Comment
-
I highlighted it for you twice. He writes that "side by side he dwarves Wilder"I don't have to stick up for anyone if I were to agree with you that would make me a dummy too,and a LIAR as well...I am neither that's your own boat you are in apparently...you even show quote from Elroy not saying Browne is taller than Wilder but stating he is one of the tallest you yourself just showed what a complete fool you are right there in your own post..you have yet to show where elroy stated Browne is taller than wilder...you cant b/c he never did....
You either Ray Charles or an Elroy alt or fellow Klittard. I'm going with the latter
But then again maybe ur just an idiot because you didn't even know that "length" means reach
Last edited by Dirk Diggler UK; 07-01-2015, 11:51 PM.Comment
-
He does dwarf Wilder in size hes much bigger as elroy clearly stated ....each section has a top village idiot im guessing you are the one in this one.,size isnt height..and "LONGER" is HEIGHT not reach as why he put 3 inches over Browne who is 6'4 and Wilder is 6'7 ,you cant add either. Elroy never mentioned LENGTH which could be a measurement of anything you imbecile
Last edited by juggernaut666; 07-02-2015, 12:32 AM.Comment
-
You mean he's a fat ****? I agree. Dwarfing someone usually refers to height just like length refers to reach. You'll soon learn.Comment
-
How do you dwarf someone by 3 inches while being severly out weighed ?Length wasnt mentioned and if it was that would still give wilder height and reach advantage not size advantage which only an imbecile cant comprehend...still waiting where he said Browne was TALLER,you apparently wont learn.......
Last edited by juggernaut666; 07-02-2015, 12:41 AM.Comment
Comment