Anyone check out the recent Ring P4P Ratings?

[Foreign Soil]

P4P isn't strictly about resumes. Have people gone full ******?

[PACnPBFsuck]

[Weebler I]

P4P isn't strictly about resumes. Have people gone full ******?

You make a fair point.

[Chrismart]

A top 11 is pretty weird. They look like they have gone for more of a resume/ability mix over their usual resume focus.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

I cant believe people still check these lists. Lol

[Luilun]

manny is at #6

Manny is wash up needs to be removed from the list I hope Broner not on the list

[Reigning Champ]

Lol get ready for Golovkin vs Bradley folks

[The Big Dunn]

How can anyone take anything in Ring serious anymore knowing the owner of the magazine spends most of his time sniffing coke, sitting on peckers and wearing women's lingerie?

[BennyST]

P4P isn't strictly about resumes. Have people gone full ******?

It's not strictly about resume, but anyone in the top ten P4P has to be doing it against the highest level of opponents, at least against a good championship level opponent certainly, otherwise there is too many questions that could arise. Too many fighters look amazing against lower to decent level guys then flaws come out all over the place against top level guys. That's why resume is so important. It shows that you're doing it at the highest level, or not.

Looking good is one thing, but winning against top guys is everything. Otherwise, why not put Loma in? He's looking P4P good against mostly stiffs. We do know, luckily, that he struggled mightily and lost when he fought his best opponent though, even if he happened to be a well past prime opponent.

So no, it's not strictly about resume, but resume really tells the full story of a fighter. When someone isn't fighting top quality guys, then their story is full of questions and no one will ever know it.

[King_]

Ew DISGUSTING P4P list.


Makes no sense. Wtf