Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Brook: Khan Wouldn't Live With Himself if a Brit Beat Him!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
    You clearly said yesterday that outside of Porter, Brook doesn't even have McCloskey on his resume. But he does! He's got quite a few fighters who are better than McCloskey. You can say what you want about being european champion, but McCloskey didn't meet a tough guy who was a top amateur and unbeaten as a pro. Gavin did and still it was a debatable decision. I felt Bundu won by a round FYI. But that's not an indication of Gavin being below someone like McCloskey's level. Clearly.
    I never said that. N'dou or Hatton are above McCloskey if anything. If I've ever brought up McCloskey in Brook-Khan context it is compare him with Gavin.

    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
    Btw, go back and check my post on Thurman vs Bundu. I was one of the few who expected bundu to last the distance.

    Obviously I was referring to Brook's homecoming bout over a guy you have continued to call "no no dan". He had fought on a higher level than McCloskey had.
    The original argument was Gavin vs McCloskey. You're just pushing Dan in there.

    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
    Why do you keep bringing up orgs? I hate to ask this, but are you thick? Honestly, what is it you don't get? You said Collazo was a top 10 WW (because of his ranking with WBO) and I laughed. It doesn't have anything to do with this AT ALL. So why do you keep bringing it up as if I'm contradicting myself when it has no similarities at all. When I use org rankings to say a fighter was top, then you can tell me i'm contradicting myself.

    No contradictions?

    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
    Nobody cares about any org rankins! Give me one example of when I have ever used such ridiculous and unsound logic to back up anything.
    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
    It's about actual rankings.

    Not bs org rankings who nobody cares about.
    Just this thread:

    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post

    They ranked Brook as a mandatory challenger, because he fought his way through their ranks fighting guys they had highly ranked and fought eliminators and final eliminators.

    WBC is an organization who Khan was never ranked by or had any of their belts and became mandatory after fighting Luis Collazo who was also not ranked in their organization?
    So, now you care about rankings?

    Admit it. IBF is flavor of the month for you cuz Brook is their champion.

    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
    According to you Saldivia was the #2 welterweight in the world
    First you claimed I said McCloskey would be Brook's second best win and now this? At this point it feels like deliberate lying. Plus why would I care if Saldivia was ranked #2 if anything it should be a Kell-end bringing that up because it benefits their argument.

    Feel free to pull quotes if you wish.


    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
    Rios wasn't ranked - and? So what? Could I care less? It's not like they made him mandatory without fighting an eliminator like Khan?
    You just talked about Brook fighting through their ranks and now it doesn't matter who is in them? Aah so, it would be bad if they made him mandatory, but it's okay if he pops in their top 15 having never been there for last 4 months having last fought in January 2015.

    You "don't care" about Rios being put at #13, yet you just went off raising objection with Khan's WBC mandatory spot in the same post.

    What was that question about me being thick?


    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
    Yeah, just like Zaveck. Despite selling 10k tickets for a fight when Khan was still a WW.

    #deluded

    He's a massive Khanturd, so there's that.
    10k? Where? Slovenia? Khan sold 16k against McCloskey.
    Last edited by Box-Office; 06-28-2015, 11:28 PM.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
      I never said that. N'dou or Hatton are above McCloskey if anything. If I've ever brought up McCloskey in Brook-Khan context it is compare him with Gavin.

      The original argument was Gavin vs McCloskey. You're just pushing Dan in there.

      No contradictions?

      Just this thread:

      So, now you care about rankings?

      Admit it. IBF is flavor of the month for you cuz Brook is their champion.

      First you claimed I said McCloskey would be Brook's second best win and now this? At this point it feels like deliberate lying. Plus why would I care if Saldivia was ranked #2 if anything it should be a Kell-end bringing that up because it benefits their argument.

      Feel free to pull quotes if you wish.

      You just talked about Brook fighting through their ranks and now it doesn't matter who is in them? Aah so, it would be bad if they made him mandatory, but it's okay if he pops in their top 15 having never been there for last 4 months having last fought in January 2015.

      You "don't care" about Rios being put at #13, yet you just went off raising objection with Khan's WBC mandatory spot in the same post.

      What was that question about me being thick?

      10k? Where? Slovenia? Khan sold 16k against McCloskey.
      But you clearly did say the other day that Brook didn't even have a McCloskey level fighter on his resume. You proceeded to say he was a homecoming fight bla bla. It was literally the exact same situation as the Jo Jo Dan fight, although Dan had fought on a considerably higher level than McCloskey.

      No, that wasn't the original discussion. You just put it there to suit your agenda. Even so, there's no difference between McCloskey and Gavin also. Gavin beat Bradley Skeete who was probably better than anyone McCloskey beat when he fought Khan. Even as crap as Skeete is.

      How am I contradicting myself there? You really must be thick mate. I didn't use an org ranking to say someone was highly ranked ffs. What is it you don't get?

      Khan was made mandatory without fighting an final eliminator, Brook did fight multiple eliminators and final eliminators. It literally has nothing to do with each other? I mean, it's really super simple - Yet you don't understand it. There's no contradiction at all.

      The contradiction would be if I said Jo Jo Dan was a top 10 WW based on his ranking with IBF. I have never said that, nor would I ever say such a ******ed thing but that's what you've said.

      Sneaking into the rankings at #13 isn't the same as being given a mandatory spot. Do you not understand the difference? If you don't understand it there's simply nothing I can do for you.

      Jesus, you keep bringing up these rankings and make yourself look more ****** with each post.

      Brook vs Hatton. War of the Roses - it did more than 10k.
      Last edited by LacedUp; 06-28-2015, 11:43 PM.

      Comment


      • #93
        Seriously, you two need to give it a rest. The arguments are so trivial now and it's just more deflection from Box Office. LacedUp is allowing him to goad him into his little scheme.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
          Seriously, you two need to give it a rest. The arguments are so trivial now and it's just more deflection from Box Office. LacedUp is allowing him to goad him into his little scheme.
          He keeps bringing up these orgs rankings which I've never used to justify a fighter's position other than explaining to everyone that Brook has to fight a top 15 guy with the IBF.. Those are just facts.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
            He keeps bringing up these orgs rankings which I've never used to justify a fighter's position other than explaining to everyone that Brook has to fight a top 15 guy with the IBF.. Those are just facts.
            Who cares? The guy literally puts his heart and soul into trying to find new ways to bash Brook or goad you into some silly little debate because he wants to try to take the focus off Khan acting like a f@g which he'll only quietly talk about under his breath.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
              Who cares? The guy literally puts his heart and soul into trying to find new ways to bash Brook or goad you into some silly little debate because he wants to try to take the focus off Khan acting like a f@g which he'll only quietly talk about under his breath.
              Dammit you're right.

              Comment


              • #97
                regardless of brooks resume, if khan is the thinking man he believes himself to be, he'd realise when an opportunity, if successful (as he apparently thinks he would be) will create other opportunities in future that would be to his desire.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  Seriously, you two need to give it a rest. The arguments are so trivial now and it's just more deflection from Box Office. LacedUp is allowing him to goad him into his little scheme.
                  Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                  He keeps bringing up these orgs rankings which I've never used to justify a fighter's position other than explaining to everyone that Brook has to fight a top 15 guy with the IBF.. Those are just facts.

                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  Who cares? The guy literally puts his heart and soul into trying to find new ways to bash Brook or goad you into some silly little debate because he wants to try to take the focus off Khan acting like a f@g which he'll only quietly talk about under his breath.
                  Call it like it is when it's due.

                  Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                  Dammit you're right.
                  Nice little support group you two have got going.


                  What's the name? Alliance of Kell-ends against Box-Office .
                  Last edited by Box-Office; 06-30-2015, 06:29 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    lol if you don't see Brook beating Khan you don't know much about boxing sorry.

                    Julio Diaz had him down, Algeri was timing him easy. Garcia knocked him out! C'mon boys, lets be serious here.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP