Comments Thread For: K. Porter on Broner's Rematch Claim, Mayweather Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HanzGruber
    STRAPMEUP
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 29824
    • 1,069
    • 238
    • 81,632

    #31
    Originally posted by LarryXXX
    I dont get that either,hell he would be doing Porter a favor
    Maybe they're just taking this stance cause they want the fight. But if floyd fights someone else I think they'll say ok to the undercard. They were gonna fight on the pac undercard apparently but beating broner and now they're too good?

    Comment

    • Wicky
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2012
      • 1071
      • 27
      • 2
      • 7,631

      #32
      Originally posted by Body Movin'
      shawn porter got kell brook problems.
      Porter loses to Brook every day of the week.

      Comment

      • FrankieClutch
        OTSC
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 6084
        • 177
        • 396
        • 26,671

        #33
        I find it weird that being on a Floyd undercard is being looked at as a sign of disrespect. I think it's the exact opposite, as chance for Shawn to put on a show in front of a lot of viewers!

        Comment

        • boxinghead530
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2015
          • 3491
          • 147
          • 82
          • 5,299

          #34
          Being on this Floyd undercard against Broner does nothing for them. He already beat Broner with all their rules they had in place and he beat Broner in front of an audience on nbc that had over 2 million viewers. Their is absolutely no way this Floyd PPV card is doing numbers like that. Especially if he's fighting Berto. The only way Floyd gets good PPV numbers is if he's fighting a huge fight against Canelo or Cotto and even GGG and also don't laugh because it's true ODLH.
          Last edited by boxinghead530; 06-25-2015, 11:02 PM.

          Comment

          • TLC8
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2013
            • 2447
            • 122
            • 0
            • 8,593

            #35
            Originally posted by FrankieClutch
            I find it weird that being on a Floyd undercard is being looked at as a sign of disrespect. I think it's the exact opposite, as chance for Shawn to put on a show in front of a lot of viewers!
            He just put on a show in front of viewers as a Main Event. He doesn't need another fight on a card of Floyd's unless he's fighting Floyd.

            Comment

            • TLC8
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2013
              • 2447
              • 122
              • 0
              • 8,593

              #36
              Originally posted by boxinghead530
              Being on this Floyd undercard against Broner does nothing for them. He already beat Broner with all their rules they had in place and he beat Broner in front of an audience on nbc that had over 2 million viewers. Their is absolutely no way this Floyd PPV card is doing numbers like that. Especially if he's fighting Berto. The only way Floyd gets good PPV numbers is if he's fighting a huge fight against Canelo or Cotto and even GGG and also don't laugh because it's true ODLH.
              Unless Floyd fights GGG or fights Kell Brook in Wembley Stadium (Floyd afraid to leave Vegas), or fights Pacquiao in May 2016, his big gate numbers are over. Floyd has KO'd 2 guys in 9 years. People tune in hoping to see someone catch Floyd flush and knock him out; not because he's exciting to watch. He's boring as hell to watch. Nobody wants to watch Floyd jab and slide along the ropes that Vegas judges call Ring Generalship. Cotto-Canelo will be a huge number, especially if they fight Texas Stadium to 100,000 live Latino fans. Brook-Khan would be massive at Wembley Stadium if Khan could ever grow a sack.

              Comment

              • Rip Chudd
                1 John 2:22
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2010
                • 22690
                • 1,932
                • 1,321
                • 260,351

                #37
                Originally posted by bojangles1987
                There shouldn't be a rematch.

                Immediate rematches should only take place in good fights that are close, preferably close enough to argue that the loser won. Porter beat Broner's ass, and it was an awful fight.

                If Broner's b*tchmade ass wants a rematch, he should actually beat someone worth a damn.
                The problem with that is that Broner can't seem to beat anyone worth a damn

                Comment

                • TLC8
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 2447
                  • 122
                  • 0
                  • 8,593

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Rip Chudd
                  The problem with that is that Broner can't seem to beat anyone worth a damn
                  Broner will be out of the sport and broke in 2 or 3 yrs. He's not smart enough to manage his career let alone manage himself in the ring. He probably can't read Harry Potter either. He has a ton of talent, but once Maidana gave him a royal beatdown, he's been all over the yard with his mind. He's a mess, and the sport will pass him by. If he had some discipline and keep himself fit and trim, 140 would have been a good spot for him. But there are too many 147lbers that hit too damn hard, and Broner would rather hold you, clinch you, than fight you, as Porter found out even at a catchweight. He has Khans problem, they don't like getting hit.

                  Comment

                  • STAX ON DECK
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 3990
                    • 324
                    • 134
                    • 6,094

                    #39
                    porter just mad cause broner made him look bad and broner wasnt even on his A game,lets be real the broner from the demarcjo fight beats the brakes off this boy

                    Comment

                    • John Barron
                      BIG LEAGUE GUY
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 9338
                      • 865
                      • 170
                      • 49,338

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Wicky
                      Porter loses to Brook every day of the week.
                      i believe so too, brook's style and size advantage is too much for porter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP