1995 Tyson vs prime Hearns,Hagler,Leonard and Duran on the same night.Does Tyson win?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Elroy1
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2014
    • 6561
    • 237
    • 61
    • 14,370

    #11
    Sequentially, Mike Tyson, any version no matter, would of course easily beat all of them on the same night!

    In probably as many rounds too!

    Probably within 3 minutes of total ring time also!!!

    The only real question would be, could the 4 of them gang up on Mike Tyson together at the same time and prevail..

    That's be a different proposition maybe.

    Comment

    • Ahmed_Ismail
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2014
      • 1003
      • 70
      • 31
      • 7,650

      #12
      While Hearns would have a good chance cuz he's naturally bigger than Tyson, he is taller and has the reach advantage, he can also stick and move and throw hard punches, still his chin was too weak, once he gets hit, which he definitley will, it'll be all over. Duran doesn't have a chance whatsoever, I see Hagler lasting longer than Duran but it's only a matter of time before he gets KOed, if Leonard could effectively use his foot work and manage to frustrate Tyson for the first 5-6 rounds, he can go the 12 rounds but I don't see him winning, Tyson always had stamina problems and after 5-6 rounds of chasing air he'll be gassed, but still if he connects it'll be very hard for Leonard or for any of these fighters to recover.

      Comment

      • Elroy1
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2014
        • 6561
        • 237
        • 61
        • 14,370

        #13
        Originally posted by Ahmed_Ismail
        While Hearns would have a good chance cuz he's naturally bigger than Tyson, he is taller and has the reach advantage, he can also stick and move and throw hard punches, still his chin was too weak, once he gets hit, which he definitley will, it'll be all over. Duran doesn't have a chance whatsoever, I see Hagler lasting longer than Duran but it's only a matter of time before he gets KOed, if Leonard could effectively use his foot work and manage to frustrate Tyson for the first 5-6 rounds, he can go the 12 rounds but I don't see him winning, Tyson always had stamina problems and after 5-6 rounds of chasing air he'll be gassed, but still if he connects it'll be very hard for Leonard or for any of these fighters to recover.
        WTF man???

        Hearns bigger than Tyson??

        Hearns was pretty much the most spindly boxer of any note in the history of boxing. He makes Wilder look solid!

        Tyson fought a bigger version of Hearns in Ratliff and knocked him clean the **** out! Tyson would breath on Hearns and knock him out.

        You correctly identified Duran as being a rabbit being torn to pieces by a rabid pit bull.

        Leonard going 5+ rounds WTF?

        Look what the guy did to Michael Spinks! Look at the guys he had to contend with in 95!!

        No way could Hagler or Leonard run that long from Tyson let alone try and fight him!

        Some ****ed up **** on this thread.

        This thread is so disrespectful to Tyson!!

        Tyson beats all 4 in a total time count of 2:30.....

        ^^ Believe it!

        Comment

        • Interloper
          Contender
          • Mar 2013
          • 380
          • 18
          • 0
          • 6,525

          #14
          Even blocked punches from Tyson would KO all of these guys. They're four weight classes apart, and he was destroying natural heavyweights who were physically much larger than him.

          Comment

          • Ahmed_Ismail
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2014
            • 1003
            • 70
            • 31
            • 7,650

            #15
            Originally posted by Elroy1
            WTF man???

            Hearns bigger than Tyson??

            Hearns was pretty much the most spindly boxer of any note in the history of boxing. He makes Wilder look solid!

            Tyson fought a bigger version of Hearns in Ratliff and knocked him clean the **** out! Tyson would breath on Hearns and knock him out.

            You correctly identified Duran as being a rabbit being torn to pieces by a rabid pit bull.

            Leonard going 5+ rounds WTF?

            Look what the guy did to Michael Spinks! Look at the guys he had to contend with in 95!!

            No way could Hagler or Leonard run that long from Tyson let alone try and fight him!

            Some ****ed up **** on this thread.

            This thread is so disrespectful to Tyson!!

            Tyson beats all 4 in a total time count of 2:30.....

            ^^ Believe it!
            Hearns was 6 ft 1 with 78 inch reach, he finished his career at cruiserweight, so naturally he's bigger than Tyson who was 5 ft 10 with 71 inch reach.

            Comment

            • BennyST
              Shhhh...
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2007
              • 9263
              • 1,036
              • 500
              • 21,301

              #16
              Originally posted by Ahmed_Ismail
              Hearns was 6 ft 1 with 78 inch reach, he finished his career at cruiserweight, so naturally he's bigger than Tyson who was 5 ft 10 with 71 inch reach.
              WTF?

              No, naturally, Hearns is taller. That's it. Most definitely not bigger.

              Both at the age of 22 when Tyson was in his prime there was getting close to 80 pounds in weight difference. Tyson 220 and Hearns 147.

              Hearns is not bigger. He's taller, but much smaller in terms of overall mass and natural size.

              That's like saying Brock Lesnar and Anderson Silva are the same size.
              Last edited by BennyST; 07-01-2015, 09:57 AM.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP