Comments Thread For: Klitschko: Deontay Wilder is One My Target Opponents

[beez721]

IDK Wlad has to get through Fury first. Guy is getting old. Wilder is just as long, more power, and then years younger. He's already sparred 50 rounds with Wlad and walked away with a camp bonus. I see this as a tough fight..

I personally dont think wilder hits quite as hard as wlad. wlad has knocked out alot of durable opponents that had never been stopped before in there career. wilder hasnt proved his power against even semi durable guys yet. he does have a live chance against wlad tho

[BWC]

I personally dont think wilder hits quite as hard as wlad. wlad has knocked out alot of durable opponents that had never been stopped before in there career. wilder hasnt proved his power against even semi durable guys yet. he does have a live chance against wlad tho

i don't think Wilder will destroy Wlad or anything, but definitely has a very good chance to beat Wlad..

[takenotes]

Wilder has a punchers chance of course, but he has never been tested. Also, his chin is terrible. He got knocked down by Dustin Nichols of all people. The first real test he had, he could not put Stiverne down and he went the full 12 rounds. I think Wlad wins the same way he won against Austin.

[BWC]

Wilder has a punchers chance of course, but he has never been tested. Also, his chin is terrible. He got knocked down by Dustin Nichols of all people. The first real test he had, he could not put Stiverne down and he went the full 12 rounds. I think Wlad wins the same way he won against Austin.

His chin is not "terrible". It held up fine with a very big puncher in Stiverne who knocked out Arreola..

[SUBZER0ED]

His chin is not "terrible". It held up fine with a very big puncher in Stiverne who knocked out Arreola..

I don't believe Stiverne landed the kind of clean, hard punches on Wilder that he did on Arreola.

[BWC]

I don't believe Stiverne landed the kind of clean, hard punches on Wilder that he did on Arreola.

He had some good shots. But if he didn't, that says something for Wilder's defense..

[SUBZER0ED]

He had some good shots. But if he didn't, that says something for Wilder's defense..

Maybe. Wilder was elusive and Stiverne was slow. But then again, Stiverne's camp did report afterward that he was dehydrated. I still want to see them rematch to prove whether or not Wilder's win was a fluke.

[BWC]

Maybe. Wilder was elusive and Stiverne was slow. But then again, Stiverne's camp did report afterward that he was dehydrated. I still want to see them rematch to prove whether or not Wilder's win was a fluke.

You actually believe that Don King BS? It's called making excuses to try to get back to a rematch.

Personally I hope there's no rematch. Stiverne was dominated, no need to see it again..

[SUBZER0ED]

You actually believe that Don King BS? It's called making excuses to try to get back to a rematch. Personally I hope there's no rematch. Stiverne was dominated, no need to see it again..

That's what you think, not what you know. Stiverne did look spent early in the fight. That's why I want to see a rematch. If Wilder is able to do it again, I can conclude that the dehydration claim was BS.

I'd rather see Wilder rematch Stiverne than fight Eric Molina. Who??

[beez721]

That's what you think, not what you know. Stiverne did look spent early in the fight. That's why I want to see a rematch. If Wilder is able to do it again, I can conclude that the dehydration claim was BS.

dehydration is a gradual process. if stiverne was winning the early rounds and faded late I could see your point but wilder was dominant from start to finish. stiverne just isnt a very good fighter at all and wilder is too long and quick for him