Comments Thread For: Tarver: No Rematch, Mayweather Solved Manny Puzzle

[b Murphington]

mr sports analyst or reporter. where can you see that mayweather is dominantly win on that fight what round? for me it is manny pacquiao who dominantly punish mayweather. your always saying dominantly win by mayweather. where is the dominant?

11. mayweather-i dominantly win by running

Neutral judges, neutral country. Pacman would win that fight 10 out of 10 times.
Vegas judges are blind as fck.

The general consensus has Mayweather clearly beating Pacquiao. That means more people think Mayweather won. And that's not just judges, but the fans. So you guys can STFU now.

[Nomadic]

Neutral judges, neutral country. Pacman would win that fight 10 out of 10 times.
Vegas judges are blind as fck.

I don't think so, you even have hard core Pac fans that admits Pac lost. You don't have any Mayweather fans with that thought crossing they mind. So it ain't just the judges that seen the same fight everyone else seen.

[hugh grant]

The only thing uncertain is the actual date of the rematch and if Pac will fight again. Floyd wont want to be remembered for winning a controversial fight with a one armed fighter.

Also in the rematch people will hope Floyd tries give entertainment, considering he did against Miguel and Maidana intentionally? Considering people paid a helluva lot more money to see his fight with Pac, Floyd would feel more obligated to give entertainment.......but didn't?

For the next fight, Floyd should imagine they are fighting in a phone box.

[Carpe Diem]

Picking the judges doesn't really solve anything

Lol..Manny is still P4P #1.

[Elroy1]

Picking the judges doesn't really solve anything

99.9% of the world including most former credentialed people think Manny Pacquaio won the fight.

Video evidence shows Manny Pacquaio won the fight.

A small handful of about 1000 people in the whole world, of which a couple of crooked paid judges and a couple of disgruntled aged fighters like Tarver are a part, believe Floyd legitimately won the fight.

^Fact.

No get your ****in ass in that ring you *****! LOL

Nice try!

[Carpe Diem]

The only thing uncertain is the actual date of the rematch and if Pac will fight again. Floyd wont want to be remembered for winning a controversial fight with a one armed fighter.

Also in the rematch people will hope Floyd tries give entertainment, considering he did against Miguel and Maidana intentionally? Considering people paid a helluva lot more money to see his fight with Pac, Floyd would feel more obligated to give entertainment.......but didn't?

For the next fight, Floyd should imagine they are fighting in a phone box.

So you're saying that Floyd should stoop down to Manny's level and fight Manny's fight just to give him a chance to win. Floyd isn't obligated to do anything. He only fight out of his comfort zone when he has to or force to against good pressure fighters, Maidana, Cotto, DLH, Hatton, Castillo. It's up to the opponent to try to make it an interesting fight against Floyd or he'll just safely cruises to a UD victory.

It's a pick your poison type of fight when it comes to fighting Floyd. If you want to play it safe and not give him the openings he needs like Canelo and Manny did, then he'll just potshots you and completely nullify your offense. If you try to be too aggressive, you'll have some success, but at the same time you'll end up giving him all the openings he needs to land his shots.


"You have to make me respect your fighting skills"- Floyd Mayweather

[The Big Dunn]

Funny how Manny was able to apply relentless pressure and score six knockdowns to a much younger fighter just five months earlier.

Five years ago the fight might not have looked much different considering the fact that Freddie Roach has had the same game plan for FIVE years. It was feint Mayweather to the ropes and land quick combos before getting out of the pocket. Basically the Oscar De La Hoya blue print which hasn't worked and never will!

Keep the excuses coming though

My dude, don't even waste your time. Most of the posters in this thread up to this post are the reason Floyd will make another $100 mil next year.

Since they are not fans of the sport, they don't understand why Manny was an easier win for Floyd than they expected. They don't care about the subtle nuances of the sport- the ones that matchmakers and analysts do- that greatly impact the outcome of a fight.

They will never understand how or why Floyd was able to neutralize Manny's output. They are more content to put it on factors like a fake shoulder injury, bad/corrupt judges, location of the fight, etc-things they know that can be changed.

No matter what you change about those tertiary factors, the primary factors-Floyd having a 5 inch longer reach and Manny not being able to use his main offensive weapon because as he said "he wouldn't stand still"- are never going to change.

I say you let them believe what ever they want and sit back and watch the same thing happen 1 or 2 more times with the hope Manny actually tries to win so we can see him get KTFO.

Floyd has got to be the luckiest fighter to ever live-idiots like the Manny diehards in this thread and his haters will end up paying him close to $350 mil for 2 easy wins over Manny.

[Slick_Rick]

Yup, don't fight him at his peak, accuse him of PED, get sued for defamation. Settle out of court with your tail between your legs.
Wait six years to fight him, in the mean time watch him deteriorate and get knocked spark out. Fight him, win a decision closer than what it really was than claim you are the TBE.

Problem solved.

[just the facts]

Picking the judges doesn't really solve anything

You're right because any competent judge had Floyd winning easily

[just the facts]

Neutral judges, neutral country. Pacman would win that fight 10 out of 10 times.
Vegas judges are blind as fck.

Keep telling yourself that if you need to, but under the criteria professional boxing is judged under, Floyd won the fight and would have won it anywhere