Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Roach: Khan Was Terrible, He'll Never Get Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Its ok freddie, im sure he will do better than manny

    Comment


    • #32
      I've grown weary of these two. Neither Khan nor Roach ever shut the ufck up.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by talz View Post
        He's been knocked out twice in 34 fights, one wasn't even a fight because it lasted 30 seconds. He's had two legit losses, both of which if he rematched today would win with ease. Khan has won plenty of times performing badly, willie limmond, Diaz, Algieri, Peterson even though he was roiding, Maidana towards the end he managed to survive and win. In the Collazo fight Khan controlled the distance not allowing him to throw in range hence he couldn't hardly land. In the Algieri fight, he wasn't controlling it as well or moving, he looked sluggish and flat.
        So basically he performs badly a lot

        Yeah...cos he's not that good.

        He couldn't control the distance against Algieri cos Algieri had height and reach advantages over him. Khan struggles when hes not the taller, longer fighter.

        Comment


        • #34
          Terrible or Not

          Fight was not boring, rated very well with the casuals

          Roach needs to let go of the hate

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
            So basically he performs badly a lot

            Yeah...cos he's not that good.

            He couldn't control the distance against Algieri cos Algieri had height and reach advantages over him. Khan struggles when hes not the taller, longer fighter.
            Looooool. It's almost like they don't read what they're typing half the time.

            There's nothing wrong with being a fan of a limited fighter, but don't try to sell him as other worldly when there's more than enough evidence to the contrary.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
              Looooool. It's almost like they don't read what they're typing half the time.

              There's nothing wrong with being a fan of a limited fighter, but don't try to sell him as other worldly when there's more than enough evidence to the contrary.
              "He's an elite fighter but he had off nights against him, him, him, him, him, him and him."

              All elite fighters have repeated 'off nights'

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by bambam182 View Post
                roach, pacs fight against money was boring. your fighter quit after the first round.
                Stop whining Pedro.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Khan looked bad against Algieri? No, he showed that he still has the same flaws he's always had. He has no inside game, his defense is poor, he doesn't look comfortable on the back foot, and his chin is still glass.

                  I've been saying for the past two years that it's nothing short of laughable that people think Khan could beat Floyd. He has WAY too many flaws to be competitive against Floyd for more than a couple of rounds.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    as if Pacquiao was very entertaining in his last outing....

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      At least Roach is calling this correctly; Khan didn't do enough to merit a fight with Mayweather.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP