Judges should have monitors when they score fights.
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
2017 and the same sh.it going on. These judges are too old and incompetent. I had it a draw but 118 to 110 is a joke. Judges don't need to be ringside.Comment
-
In this day and age more can definitely be done to make sure there are not bad cards like this. The 1st thing is have the judges see the fight from the same angle.
You can fairly argue that the angle one watches a live fight determines how the score(not that that excuse byrd's 118-110 score).Comment
-
Ive said this before! To be honest I think there should be 5 judges, 2 of them should be locked in a room watching the fight from a monitor with 0 sound. If anything itd be cool to see how differently they score the fight from the 3 other ringside judges.
Also I think ESPECIALLY in Vegas with all the $ on the line, the judges should be subject to random polygraph testing.Comment
-
That's interestingIve said this before! To be honest I think there should be 5 judges, 2 of them should be locked in a room watching the fight from a monitor with 0 sound. If anything itd be cool to see how differently they score the fight from the 3 other ringside judges.
Also I think ESPECIALLY in Vegas with all the $ on the line, the judges should be subject to random polygraph testing.Comment
-
I think they should have different vantage points than they do now. I can't believe looking up through the ropes is the best angle for them to see all the action. Either put them above the ring or behind closed doors with a monitor with headphones on and no sound .
Also, I don't think the promoters or anyone should know who's judging the fights beforehand. All that does is give them a chance to bribe them or whatever it is they do to influence their cards. Too much incompetence and corruption going on in boxing.Comment

Comment