Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Cotto-Geale: When Three Pounds is a Heavy Issue

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Cotto-Geale: When Three Pounds is a Heavy Issue

    By Cliff Rold - Miguel Cotto is one of the best, most tested, and toughest matched fighters of his generation. Miguel Cotto is not a modern Middleweight.

    That’s why it’s so unfortunate that he’s the current Middleweight Champion of the World, at least in terms of history and the WBC belt.

    With much adieu in social media, and with the clock ticking to the weigh-in Friday, it remains to be seen if Cotto’s challenger this weekend can make the contracted weight for the fight. Oh, we know Daniel Geale can make the Middleweight limit of 160 lbs.

    The former unified Middleweight beltholder has been making 160 most of his career.

    The contracted weight for this fight, as requested by the Middleweight champion, is three pounds under that limit. Whether that affects the outcome of the fight might be tough to assess. Geale could always win and make it a non-issue. The fighter who went to Germany to defeat Sebastian Sylvester and Felix Sturm for titles is certainly capable.

    That it could affect the outcome, and is a story in the days before the fight, gets back to the original point.

    Miguel Cotto is not a modern Middleweight.

    He’s not that interested in fighting them either.

    Headlines and speculation about whether Geale can get that low on the scale will be answered soon. This is hardly the first catchweight bout in boxing. They happen more often than most realize and aren’t, on face, that big a deal.

    How they’re being used in recent years is raising some ire. We live in an era when the practice has become so pervasive as to be used in a unification fight between reigning titlists in the same class (Floyd Mayweather-Saul Alvarez, 2013). That wasn’t a first. We saw the same thing in Bernard Hopkins-Oscar De La Hoya in 2004. [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Cotto fan, but...

    I've been a huge Cotto fan for years. As a matter of fact, I was crushed when he lost to Pacquiao. I remember when he criticized Pacquiao for demanding him to fight at a catchweight for their title fight. Back then, Cotto boldly said fighters should fight for titles at the full weight limit.

    Fast forward 6 years, and Cotto is sadly and hypocritically doing what he criticized back then. It's disappointing.

    Comment


    • #3
      *miguel cotto voice* Miguel Cotto feel theee. Feel theeee confidence. With... Eh... With FreDDee. Miguel Cotto feel 25. FEEEEEL greT. Bott Miguel Cotto has nozzenn tooo... TO... prove to Golovkeen.

      Comment


      • #4
        What a shame for boxing and insult to the fans! I will not be watching this garbage! I hope geale puts cotto out of his misery! Go away miguel nobody wants a fake champ! We have enough with floyd! Cotto/floys II is garbage

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by OffDaChainChico View Post
          I've been a huge Cotto fan for years. As a matter of fact, I was crushed when he lost to Pacquiao. I remember when he criticized Pacquiao for demanding him to fight at a catchweight for their title fight. Back then, Cotto boldly said fighters should fight for titles at the full weight limit.

          Fast forward 6 years, and Cotto is sadly and hypocritically doing what he criticized back then. It's disappointing.

          It was quite a while before Cotto said anything about the catch weight, he honored it, and took the loss gracefully. He didnt complain leading into the fight or even after. Now lets look at the fact that Cotto was the WBO champ and he was the one that was forced to accept a catch weight against the challenger, or the WBO would strip him of the belt and allow Pac to fight for that same vacant WBO belt. Here, Cotto is the champ and chose to fulfill his voluntary defense against Daniel Geale, Daniel Geale had an option to take the fight at a catch weight or not, all he would lose is a pay day, or rather "miss" a pay day because you cant lose something you never had. Now although I expect Cotto to fight GGG at a catch weight (if it were to happen) I would be a little disappointed because GGG is the mando and shouldnt have to fight the reigning champ at a catch weight. Daniel Geale is not a mandatory challenger so the catch weight is a moot point.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by KnickTillDeaTh View Post
            It was quite a while before Cotto said anything about the catch weight, he honored it, and took the loss gracefully. He didnt complain leading into the fight or even after. Now lets look at the fact that Cotto was the WBO champ and he was the one that was forced to accept a catch weight against the challenger, or the WBO would strip him of the belt and allow Pac to fight for that same vacant WBO belt. Here, Cotto is the champ and chose to fulfill his voluntary defense against Daniel Geale, Daniel Geale had an option to take the fight at a catch weight or not, all he would lose is a pay day, or rather "miss" a pay day because you cant lose something you never had. Now although I expect Cotto to fight GGG at a catch weight (if it were to happen) I would be a little disappointed because GGG is the mando and shouldnt have to fight the reigning champ at a catch weight. Daniel Geale is not a mandatory challenger so the catch weight is a moot point.
            So Geale should just bow out and miss one of his biggest paydays... all because of Diva Cottoid's whining? Sorry, don't agree.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
              So Geale should just bow out and miss one of his biggest paydays... all because of Diva Cottoid's whining? Sorry, don't agree.
              Bow out of what? Do you not understand that Cotto's people contacted Geale and said here are the terms, do you want to fight Cotto? Do you not understand that Geale is in no way a mandatory challenger to the Middleweight title? Do you not understand that Geale was in no way shape or form obligated to take this fight, nor agree to the terms of said fight?

              Comment


              • #8
                Ultimately, everyone is a hypocrite. I'd definitely like to see fewer catchweight fights, especially when they're title defences.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Very well put by Donovan.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
                    Very well put by Donovan.
                    Donovan?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP