Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The myth of rigouous testing in British boxing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The myth of rigouous testing in British boxing

    Many British posters on this website, most notably one Dirk Diggler Uk and premier Brook bumsniff "LacedUp" continue to propagate the disingenuous myth of rigorous year round drug testing for British boxing. The truth is there is year round testing but it isn't so strict.

    Here is an interesting article on David Price's lack of drug testing by the British Boxing Board of Control

    David Price calls for stricter drugs testing in boxing


    By Ben Dirs
    BBC Sport

    British and Commonwealth heavyweight champion David Price has called on boxing's governing bodies to do more in the battle against drugs.
    A string of high-profile boxers have tested positive for banned substances in 2012, including Lamont Peterson, who beat Amir Khan last December.
    Price says the British Boxing Board of Control should increase the number of random blood tests it carries out.
    "I haven't been randomly tested since I turned pro," Price told BBC Sport.
    "Not once in three-and-a-half years. I have had urine tests before title fights, but I'd like to see more random blood testing.

    "I know expense is an issue, but more could be done, especially in light of what happened with Larry Olubamiwo.

    "He was taking every drug under the sun and that could have ended up in disastrous consequences for someone, given the nature of the sport."
    In June, London heavyweight Olubamiwo was banned for four years for multiple anti-doping violations.
    Olubamiwo tested positive for the blood-boosting substance EPO, which was also used by disgraced cyclist Lance Armstrong, following a bout with Sam Sexton in January.
    The 33-year-old later admitted to using 13 banned substances, including human growth hormone and anabolic steroids, over a six-year period competing as an amateur and professional boxer.
    BBBofC general secretary Robert Smith said the programme of testing the board has in place is "adequate at the present time".
    "We have 850 boxers and over the last two or three years we've done almost 200 out-of-competition tests," Smith told BBC Sport.
    "We test every single championship contest, we test randomly on undercard fights and if we hear anything, obviously, we will go and test people.
    ***8220;
    Don't forget drug testing costs money. That's not a reason for not doing it, but there is a dividing line for any governing body
    ***8221;
    Robert Smith
    General secretary, British Boxing Board of Control
    "We had two positive tests this year connected to supplements, which is a problem because of people's naivety, and we had two connected to steroid abuse.
    "UK Anti-Doping do all our tests and we have a programme in place for out-of-competition testing, which works very well. They pick and choose who they want to do."
    Smith did concede that, while the board introduced random blood testing this year, cost ruled against wider testing.
    He said: "Random blood testing came in this year. But don't forget this costs money as well. That's not a reason for not doing it, but there is a dividing line for any governing body.
    "It's not just dope testing we have to look after; there are many other things that have to be funded.
    "If we had a spate of positive tests, we would have to ask ourselves if we weren't doing enough, but we're doing what we can at the present time.
    "And it's good that people are getting caught because it shows we're doing something about it."
    Peterson tested positive for synthetic testosterone shortly before his proposed rematch with Khan in May.
    He was stripped of his World Boxing Association belt, but the International Boxing Federation cleared the American of using drugs to enhance his performance.
    As well as Peterson and Olubamiwo, former world champions Antonio Tarver, Andre Berto and Julio Cesar Chavez Jr tested positive for drugs in 2012.
    Price added: "It makes you think, is it just the tip of the iceberg? That's why I would welcome more stringent testing, to clear the sport of cheats if they are out there."
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/20068384

    These guys aren't tested as much as Dirk and Lacedup want you to think.
    Last edited by Hype job; 06-01-2015, 02:35 AM.

  • #2
    British boxing board of control is a mess

    They still have Ian John Lewis on the books

    That in itself just shows what total garbage they are

    He had Mitchell up by 6 vs linares?
    Failed to stop Johnson vs Joshua after first round?

    He makes a big error in every fight he's involved in

    Comment


    • #3
      Take the test Brook!

      Take the test!

      Comment


      • #4
        I never said it was that rigorous. I said you are under threat to be tested at any time. It's obviously not full proof but its a deterrent.

        So yeah, you can go a long time without being tested like Price was or you can be tested more often. Key word - random. Froch was woken up at 6am to get tested before the Mack fight, waking his newborn kid.

        It's expensive to implement so its not as rigorous as it could be but they are increasing the amount of random tests each year.

        There is absolutely no random testing whatsoever in America.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Hype job View Post
          Take the test Brook!

          Take the test!
          He requested random testing for the Porter fight. He has no issue taking any test.

          Comment


          • #6
            So he wasn't tested in 3 years, yes that was unacceptable but that was some years ago, the BBBofC just like most organizations always thrive to improve. Boxers in this country are subjected to being tested randomly, but they shouldn't have left a 3 years gap where one isn't tested.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
              I never said it was that rigorous. I said you are under threat to be tested at any time. It's obviously not full proof but its a deterrent.

              So yeah, you can go a long time without being tested like Price was or you can be tested more often. Key word - random. Froch was woken up at 6am to get tested before the Mack fight, waking his newborn kid.

              It's expensive to implement so its not as rigorous as it could be but they are increasing the amount of random tests each year.

              There is absolutely no random testing whatsoever in America.
              Yeah but you and Lacedup like to overplay it.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Hype job View Post
                Yeah but you and Lacedup like to overplay it.
                I can only speak for myself. British boxers are under threat to be tested year round. That is simply a fact, not a myth.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  I can only speak for myself. British boxers are under threat to be tested year round. That is simply a fact, not a myth.
                  This is true.
                  When you look at it in black and white it's appears bulletproof but HypeJob has a point.
                  With that said Dirk is and was only stating facts.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    British Boxing Commission or what have you is a joke.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP