The Extermely Bias of the Sky Boxing Commentators Was Disgusting [PICS of PROOF WHY]

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #CaneloKhan
    The Best vs The Best!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2011
    • 1396
    • 88
    • 16
    • 7,756

    #1

    The Extermely Bias of the Sky Boxing Commentators Was Disgusting [PICS of PROOF WHY]

    They were crying up and down for the fight to be stopped when Gradovich suffered a non threathen cut on the side of his face but when mitchell suffered a helaious life threathen type of cut they didnt say a word about stopping the fight they actually went on and praise mitchell for his braverly fighting and that he actually winning and blah blah blah.

    Was one of the most disgusting blatant display of bias I have heard, we always hear some but this was extreme.

    This is the eye/cut of mitchell that the skybox commentators didnt mention once that the fight should be stopped.



    This is the cut of Gradovich that the commentators were crying up and down and pleading for the stoppage.

  • Sugar Adam Ali
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2013
    • 27630
    • 970
    • 1,174
    • 82,827

    #2
    Bias in boxing? You don't say....

    Comment

    • #CaneloKhan
      The Best vs The Best!
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2011
      • 1396
      • 88
      • 16
      • 7,756

      #3
      Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
      Bias in boxing? You don't say....
      like a female much? sarcasm.......

      Comment

      • Grimmer
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2008
        • 4270
        • 299
        • 354
        • 10,636

        #4
        Sky's bias is well documented.

        Comment

        • Hougigo
          Gossip Girl
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2011
          • 38755
          • 730
          • 236
          • 47,223

          #5
          Well yea, that's the regular

          Comment

          • MPX309
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2013
            • 2917
            • 101
            • 1
            • 12,045

            #6
            Only now you're realising this?

            Comment

            • sicko
              The Truth Hurts
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2010
              • 34211
              • 2,594
              • 839
              • 151,307

              #7
              It is mostly Jim Watt, I do miss Ian Darke calling boxing he was GREAT and wasn't as bias as Jim Watt. This guy working with Jim Watt now just goes along with what ever he says. Having Paulie as that 3rd Guy helps because Paulie at least tries to even things out a bit

              But Everybody Country and Every Network is Bias towards who ever they're making money off of. Jim Watt is no different than Jim Lampley to be honest. One push an agenda for Sky the other for HBO

              Comment

              • Ray*
                Be safe!!!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 44867
                • 1,654
                • 1,608
                • 558,890

                #8
                That's normal in boxing, every country you go to there is bias. I think America too have the same thing but not as much as in other countries.

                Comment

                • the_blueprint
                  way of life
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 6331
                  • 69
                  • 165
                  • 14,468

                  #9
                  sky commentary is my least favourite, the bias is so blatant. it's better not to listen to it. Boxnation are much better. but i wouldn't say any of them are great. I find the only ones i listen to are the actual fighters like roy jones, paulie, bernard. lampley and kellerman are only good for talking about things during the build up, they hype the fight up. their input on how the fight is going is generally pointless. which is sad considering they've been doing it for the majority of their lives

                  Comment

                  • fistic flow
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 603
                    • 148
                    • 165
                    • 15,871

                    #10
                    Jim Watt is also criticised for being negative about Brit fighters. I watch an Argentinian channel and they call robbery on any Latino/ Latin linked fighter that doesn't get the decision.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP