Comments Thread For: Cotto: I Have Nothing To Prove To Canelo or Golovkin

[Build That Wall]

You're starting to sound like a Pact.ard.

And if you think Mayweather fans are supposed to hate GGG, You are more ******ed than I thought.

[bigjavi973]

Yes you do. You can prove them you still got it.

That is a very good point as well.

[aboutfkntime]

In other words, he doesnt want to face top guys anymore. So we can pressure if we want, doesnt matter. Let Cotto fight weak@$$ comp for the remainder of his career

Not sure if you are a Golovkin fan, but I just want to put your comments into perspective......

1) Cotto is a proven legend, and first ballot hall-of-famer

2) Golovkin is not a proven legend, and first ballot hall-of-famer, yet

3) Daniel Geale, is Golovkins best win

4) So, if Cotto beats Geale, his "weakA$$ comp" at middleweight looks identical to Golovkins



The reality of Golovkins hype is still lost on some folks.

I did not think that Cotto would ever fight a genuine middleweight, let alone a top 3 guy like Geale.

[Craveman]

It's true. Cotto has nothing to prove against these two because he will lose and he knows it. Cotto better hope that he will win against Geale because that's only thing going to keep him credible enough have mega money showdown with Alvarez.

[aboutfkntime]

What does Golovkin prove by beating Cotto??

Nothing.

This ^^

It is funny as shht to me that Cotto is the proven legend, and yet everybody is on his nuts..... and Golovkin is over-hyped, clearly well-managed, has no defining wins, and yet he gets a pass for calling out JMW's and bums.

I fkn hate casual fans, they should all be shot.

Listen up ****s..... Geale (Cotto's next opponent, and current top 3 MW) is Hype-ovkins best win.

You all do understand that, right ?

[The Champions]

And if you think Mayweather fans are supposed to hate GGG, You are more ******ed than I thought.

That's not it....

You're just starting to sound like you've been having dinner at the Kennel.

[Craveman]

Not sure if you are a Golovkin fan, but I just want to put your comments into perspective......

1) Cotto is a proven legend, and first ballot hall-of-famer

2) Golovkin is not a proven legend, and first ballot hall-of-famer, yet

3) Daniel Geale, is Golovkins best win

4) So, if Cotto beats Geale, his "weakA$$ comp" at middleweight looks identical to Golovkins



The reality of Golovkins hype is still lost on some folks.

I did not think that Cotto would ever fight a genuine middleweight, let alone a top 3 guy like Geale.

Sorry but Geale isn't Golovkin best win, Murray is. Don't listen to that guy Geale is a decent win but not worthy of having a shot at champion. In the end, he choose the easiest guy not even Quillen or Lee.

[OnePunch]

"I don't need to prove anything. My career is already made."

Enough said.

great. then retire already instead of taking up space

[aboutfkntime]

The people saying Cotto is a coward have to be missing chromosomes. Trying to diminish what he's done in the sport smacks of mental ******ation :/

Good post doom ^^

[The Champions]

This ^^

It is funny as shht to me that Cotto is the proven legend, and yet everybody is on his nuts..... and Golovkin is over-hyped, clearly well-managed, has no defining wins, and yet he gets a pass for calling out JMW's and bums.

I fkn hate casual fans, they should all be shot.

Listen up ****s..... Geale (Cotto's next opponent, and current top 3 MW) is Hype-ovkins best win.

You all do understand that, right ?

If Quillan called out Cotto.
They'd call him a coward.

"Why is Kid Duckula picking on Cotto,he's not even a real MW"

"This Quillan is a disgrace,trying to fight a guy that started at 140"