Unified Champions

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AIR_KENG
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2004
    • 11809
    • 572
    • 322
    • 23,359

    #1

    Unified Champions

    I was just thinking, Unified champions should stake all their belts everytime they fight... I say what's the point of holding back 1 or 2 of your belts and stake only one, and then you lose and you're still the champ for two sanctioning bodies???

    just like the case of zab, when he lost his championship to baldi, he still took home his two other championships...

    what do you think???
  • DiegoFuego
    Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2005
    • 17338
    • 1,403
    • 586
    • 24,657

    #2
    I say **** the belts. The Ring is king.

    Comment

    • AIR_KENG
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2004
      • 11809
      • 572
      • 322
      • 23,359

      #3
      Originally posted by DiegoFuego
      I say **** the belts. The Ring is king.
      the belts mean something though, even just a bit

      Comment

      • shane_mueller
        Up and Comer
        • Feb 2006
        • 56
        • 8
        • 6
        • 6,398

        #4
        i think the whole idea of holding belts back or not putting any of your belts on the line is just *****. if your a champ then prove it. I dont think there should be an option, i think if your champ you put your title on the line every time you fight, thats part of the responsibilty of being at the top, but thats just my opinion.

        Comment

        • AIR_KENG
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 11809
          • 572
          • 322
          • 23,359

          #5
          Originally posted by shane_mueller
          i think the whole idea of holding belts back or not putting any of your belts on the line is just *****. if your a champ then prove it. I dont think there should be an option, i think if your champ you put your title on the line every time you fight, thats part of the responsibilty of being at the top, but thats just my opinion.
          that's what i am talking about... regardless of what fight it is you're taking, belts should be at stake always... at least to have more use for the belts...

          Comment

          • the_truth_1984
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Feb 2006
            • 683
            • 14
            • 0
            • 6,990

            #6
            The Ring magazine belt is the most important belt in boxing.It has no need to have bull**** ratings and champs cuz they don't have sanctioning fees.In the case of the Baldomir-Judah fight only the WBC title was on the line cuz of sanctioning fees but since Zab lost the one belt even if Baldomir didn't get the other 2 he should have been stripped of the others.

            Comment

            • JOM'S
              MANILA ICE
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2004
              • 13036
              • 1,420
              • 1,381
              • 28,113

              #7
              the only problem with all those belts, you have to pay all their sanction fees and the is sh_ty, for the figthers to pay all of this fees for one fight, its there blood and guts on the line...

              ITS PROBABLY HIGH TIME TO CORRECT THE MESS BOXING IS IN, before there where only ONE Champ per division then TWO, then THREE ... the rate its going maybe at the turn of the century there will be ONE HUNDRED CHAMPS, tsk tsk ... I DON'T KNOW HOW IT COULD BE DONE, BUT THERE SHOULD ONLY BE ONE WORLD CHAMPION for every division...

              Comment

              • JuicyJuice
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2006
                • 3493
                • 111
                • 4
                • 3,913

                #8
                Originally posted by DiegoFuego
                The Ring is king.
                Bull****! The Ring is corrupted.

                Decide yourself, and if you can't decide yourself then your a ******.

                Comment

                • AIR_KENG
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 11809
                  • 572
                  • 322
                  • 23,359

                  #9
                  Originally posted by JOM'S
                  the only problem with all those belts, you have to pay all their sanction fees and the is sh_ty, for the figthers to pay all of this fees for one fight, its there blood and guts on the line...

                  ITS PROBABLY HIGH TIME TO CORRECT THE MESS BOXING IS IN, before there where only ONE Champ per division then TWO, then THREE ... the rate its going maybe at the turn of the century there will be ONE HUNDRED CHAMPS, tsk tsk ... I DON'T KNOW HOW IT COULD BE DONE, BUT THERE SHOULD ONLY BE ONE WORLD CHAMPION for every division...
                  right... there should only be one champion every decision

                  Comment

                  • paulkimlax
                    Banned
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 143
                    • 13
                    • 0
                    • 201

                    #10
                    i hope one rich ass mofo could buy out all 4(WBA,IBF,WBA & WBO) sanctioning bodies and unify em to one. then we wont have any problem.


                    come on .... mega lotto ^^
                    Last edited by paulkimlax; 03-31-2006, 04:07 AM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP