Why does Vitali Klitschko deserve the Ring belt?
by Jimmy Bryght, independent sportswriter
Last year Nigel Collins, the editor of The Ring Magazine, appointed Vitali Klitschko as the magazine's heavyweight champion of world. And while I adore Vitali and have always been impressed by his domination of opponents, I don't quite get why Collins would just anoint VK as king of the big men without some proof that he can beat the best of the best.
Face it, he knocked Lummox Lewis silly in that six-round "loss" in Los Angeles. Lewis was exhausted and was lucky to escape with his title that night. Lummox subsequently retired when the WBC mandated an immediate rematch between the two.
You could almost smell Lewis' fear.
Then, in a match for the vacant WBC crown, VK thoroughly dominated a journeyman fighter named Corrie Sanders who had embarassed a younger Wladimir Klitschko some months before. Sure, Sanders is a tough guy, but he's never been in the Top Five in anyone's list until he blasted WK.
A few months ago, VK destroyed another journeyman (Danny Williams) who got lucky enough to knock the hell out of an ancient and injured Mike Tyson. Big deal.
In my opinion, Vitali Klitschko doesn't deserve to called the heavyweight champion of the world just yet. He needs to clean out the division first. Not even Lummox Lewis could do that. VK must fight a rematch with Chris Byrd, the man Lewis ducked for five years. Bryd defeated VK several years ago via TKO when Klitschko had to retire on his stool due to a shoulder injury.
Also, Vitali must knock WBA beltholder John "Mr. Average" Ruiz off his pedestal and end that boring man's reign so we're never cursed by watching his yawn-fests again.
In one hand, Vitali holds the WBC belt, which is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. In the other hand he holds The Ring Magazine's paper title, which he hasn't earned yet according Collins' own rules. So, who's the heavyweight champion of the world?
Each person gets to decide that for her/himself.
by Jimmy Bryght, independent sportswriter
Last year Nigel Collins, the editor of The Ring Magazine, appointed Vitali Klitschko as the magazine's heavyweight champion of world. And while I adore Vitali and have always been impressed by his domination of opponents, I don't quite get why Collins would just anoint VK as king of the big men without some proof that he can beat the best of the best.
Face it, he knocked Lummox Lewis silly in that six-round "loss" in Los Angeles. Lewis was exhausted and was lucky to escape with his title that night. Lummox subsequently retired when the WBC mandated an immediate rematch between the two.
You could almost smell Lewis' fear.
Then, in a match for the vacant WBC crown, VK thoroughly dominated a journeyman fighter named Corrie Sanders who had embarassed a younger Wladimir Klitschko some months before. Sure, Sanders is a tough guy, but he's never been in the Top Five in anyone's list until he blasted WK.
A few months ago, VK destroyed another journeyman (Danny Williams) who got lucky enough to knock the hell out of an ancient and injured Mike Tyson. Big deal.
In my opinion, Vitali Klitschko doesn't deserve to called the heavyweight champion of the world just yet. He needs to clean out the division first. Not even Lummox Lewis could do that. VK must fight a rematch with Chris Byrd, the man Lewis ducked for five years. Bryd defeated VK several years ago via TKO when Klitschko had to retire on his stool due to a shoulder injury.
Also, Vitali must knock WBA beltholder John "Mr. Average" Ruiz off his pedestal and end that boring man's reign so we're never cursed by watching his yawn-fests again.
In one hand, Vitali holds the WBC belt, which is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. In the other hand he holds The Ring Magazine's paper title, which he hasn't earned yet according Collins' own rules. So, who's the heavyweight champion of the world?
Each person gets to decide that for her/himself.
Comment