Should Boxing go back to no win until someone quits or knocked out?

[FeFist]

Shows that some people have zero interest in boxing as a sport. Just a bunch of mindless savages expecting athletes to give them their jollies.

[Shogunofharlem1]

Even for a pac fan this is desperate dude. Let it go. It was just a fight.

[Robbie Barrett]

Lets change boxing to suit Pacquiao.

[MASTERBX]

disgrace

...or we can save a lot of embarrassment and excuses if these “warriors” learned to cut off the ring?

#48 AND his fans are a disgrace to our sport.

[b00g13man]

#48 would still have lost.

[supremeboxer]

boxers are now professional athletes,and boxing is a sport.if you dont like the way floyd fights,then dont watch his fights.theres plenty other boxers who are all action,if thats your thing.you have different styles in boxing,accept it.

[-PBP-]

That's just cruel. But then again you are talking about people that would rather watch a one sided massacre against a good fighter and a chinless, skill less novice then a chess match between 2 all time greats.

[Just Now Hit Me]

It would be interesting to watch but honestly boxing is already brutal enough.

If you were to subject fighters to this then you would have to pay them triple.

But like I said boxing is already plenty violent. I mean look at the recent Tapia-Soro KO. Soro was throwing bungalows to Tapia's dome... with great technique. Very brutal. I vote no but didn't vote in your poll because it is biased.

[Deevel916]

When there's so much money being paid to even the loser, it lessens the incentive to win.

If you ask me, all matches should be an 80/20 split with the 80 going to the winner. Only then will you see both fighters put absolutely everything on the line.

[HEND]

Stop with the pretentious wanna be macho BS, nobody will think you're tough just because you make threads like this and punch you chest that you're only curious for KO-s.