TBE schooled that beast??? TBE is a league of his own....

[Divine Hammer]

ahahah I think I hit right at the right nerve on this one ahah by seing Daggum and you on your high horses.

Algieri is total utter crap, Kirkland level but at least Kirkland can punch. Rios is atrocious defensively.

And if Murray and Geale are the two best guys you could find in the career of a 33 years old fighter, then sorry but this fighter has a ****ty resume for sure.

well think what you want but truth is algieri was ranked in the top 5 at 140, was WBO world champ, and clearly beat beast provodnikov (machine matthysse even says he carefully borrowed algieri's tactics to beat provo). meanwhile kirkland was coming off a more than 1 year layoff, wasnt ranked top ten anywhere, and has a completely mediocre chin and defense. at least algieri didn't get completey destroyed by someone a soft puncher like frickin ishida hahahahahahahahahahahaha.

algieri also outclassed emmanuel taylor where broner struggled bad hahahahahahaha. so i guess broner is complete and utter trash.

and GGG's resume is far better than canelo's. murray, geale, macklin, proksa, rubio, ishida, etc. allgood wins. canelo's only good win are trout and lara and i thought he easily lost against lara and drew or lost against trout.

[Johnny2x2x]

ahahah I think I hit right at the right nerve on this one ahah by seing Daggum and you on your high horses.

Algieri is total utter crap, Kirkland level but at least Kirkland can punch. Rios is atrocious defensively.

And if Murray and Geale are the two best guys you could find in the career of a 33 years old fighter, then sorry but this fighter has a ****ty resume for sure.

That's the bottom line. Murray and Geale? Give me a break, GGG has fought no one yet. He's looked good, but waake me up when he's in with a legit top 20 P4P fighter.

[DeadLikeMe]

Mayweather made Pac an ineffective and lost puppy.

[daggum]

ahahah I think I hit right at the right nerve on this one ahah by seing Daggum and you on your high horses.

Algieri is total utter crap, Kirkland level but at least Kirkland can punch. Rios is atrocious defensively.

And if Murray and Geale are the two best guys you could find in the career of a 33 years old fighter, then sorry but this fighter has a ****ty resume for sure.

canelo had the hype machine behind him his entire career and yet in 47 fights he's only beaten 2 top 5 guys. ggg who had no backing his entire career and had to earn the spotlight has already beaten 3 top 5 guys in 32 fights. the fact that you don't recognize some people have an easier path than others says a lot.

[Jcsuper]

well think what you want but truth is algieri was ranked in the top 5 at 140, was WBO world champ, and clearly beat beast provodnikov (machine matthysse even says he carefully borrowed algieri's tactics to beat provo). meanwhile kirkland was coming off a more than 1 year layoff, wasnt ranked top ten anywhere, and has a completely mediocre chin and defense. at least algieri didn't get completey destroyed by someone a soft puncher like frickin ishida hahahahahahahahahahahaha.

algieri also outclassed emmanuel taylor where broner struggled bad hahahahahahaha. so i guess broner is complete and utter trash.

and GGG's resume is far better than canelo's. murray, geale, macklin, proksa, rubio, ishida, etc. allgood wins. canelo's only good win are trout and lara and i thought he easily lost against lara and drew or lost against trout.

Sorry, even if you repeat 1000 times that Algieri is legit he is not. He is a C level fighter with an okay jab. Also your triangle theories to make him legit just show again how much you dont understand boxing.

If you give credit to Pacquiao for beating Algieri (C level fighter) than give credit to Alvarez for destroying Kirkland (C level fighter).

If you don't want to give credit to Alvarez for destroying Kirkland, it's ok with me, but dont give credit to Pac for beating Algieri who is C level fighter without punching power.

[creekrat77]

in all fairness i was always crap but what's so great about beating kirkland? he's not even ranked, he had 1 fight in 3 years, has a seth mitchlel chin, and he was ko'd in 1 round by ishida.

Don't even bother. Once again we have a wave of Mayweather fans living through another fighters victory. Kirkland is that marketable type of fighter that people are itching to get a shot at because they all smell the same thing everyone else does, and that's blood/weakness. Kirkland doesn't have a good chin and even worst, he is terrible at concealing it. I'm surprised Kirkland isn't signed with Haymon because he gives off this whole oxymoron of looking the part but being far from what people expect. I like Kirkland though he is a blood and guts warrior and didn't turn into a coward. But yea he was out of the game for a long time, hasn't really reached the elite level yet, has always had a **** defense, and even with all these negatives I'm still surprised Canelo was matched up with him. I mean for gods sakes Canelo was fighting Boldomir and Mathew Hatton a few years ago

[KillaMane26]

Cant take u serious calling Floyd "TBE

[Divine Hammer]

Sorry, even if you repeat 1000 times that Algieri is legit he is not. He is a C level fighter with an okay jab. Also your triangle theories to make him legit just show again how much you dont understand boxing.

If you give credit to Pacquiao for beating Algieri (C level fighter) than give credit to Alvarez for destroying Kirkland (C level fighter).

If you don't want to give credit to Alvarez for destroying Kirkland, it's ok with me, but dont give credit to Pac for beating Algieri who is C level fighter without punching power.

alvarez gets no credit for beating a guy not ranked top ten anywhere, coming off a more than 1 year layoff, a come forward fighter with a completely mediocre chin and mediocre defense. can't give him credit for that win.

manny beat an undefeated world champion ranked top ten in his weightclass, coming off a upset win against provo. plus algieri has a better boxing IQ than kirkland. how is algieri C class in that case???? he's not elite, but he's not C class either.

get a clue hahahahahaha.

[creekrat77]

Sorry, even if you repeat 1000 times that Algieri is legit he is not. He is a C level fighter with an okay jab. Also your triangle theories to make him legit just show again how much you dont understand boxing.

If you give credit to Pacquiao for beating Algieri (C level fighter) than give credit to Alvarez for destroying Kirkland (C level fighter).

If you don't want to give credit to Alvarez for destroying Kirkland, it's ok with me, but dont give credit to Pac for beating Algieri who is C level fighter without punching power.

I think the point of Algieri fighting Pac was that people hoped he could actually rise to the occasion and fight a fight. As soon as Pac landed some shots he got scared and literally stayed in survival mode all night. Had 0 to give, just running around flicking punches. Algieri is ****. But he wasn't **** until Pac wiped the floor with him

[Jcsuper]

canelo had the hype machine behind him his entire career and yet in 47 fights he's only beaten 2 top 5 guys. ggg who had no backing his entire career and had to earn the spotlight has already beaten 3 top 5 guys in 32 fights. the fact that you don't recognize some people have an easier path than others says a lot.

ahahah lol with your "number of fights". GGG is 33 years old and the best name you guys can come up with is Geale and Murray for god sake, thats just awful.

Don't get me wrong, GGG is a beast and top 7 p4p imo. But still he hasnt fight a guy who is near the top 30 pound for pound. So it's like I said to your fellow lunatic pac fan Divine Hammer, if you want to give credit to GGG for koing tomato cans, than give credit to Alvarez when he beats some too. You dont want to give credit to Alvarez for beating Lara, Trout, Kirkland, Mosley, than please shou t your mouth with GGG with his Rubio, Geale, Murray and Adama.