Have a legitimate pulse. Something no one he has fought, has had yet.
How to beat GGG?
Collapse
-
-
-
He's nothing special. If you want to legitimize him to make GGG more accredited then go for it. That's up to you. I call it for what it is. I'm not going to sugar coat and ****e up his or anyone else's resume.Comment
-
Résumé isn't great but he's obliterated some solid guys. I don't think he's lost a round in years.Comment
-
Comment
-
That's what I'm saying too..who the *** are murray,geale and the next bum he's fighting lol ?Comment
-
Thanks for the laugh.
Ya, who knows what will happen when he steps up, but I'm confident he will be fine based on his performances. I'll use broner as an example. People were slobbering over broner and he was barely scraping by guys like ponce de Leon. Once he stepped up he lost, and since then people realize hes nothing special. How you win matters. Meanwhile ggg has been smashing that caliber of opponent. Kovalev was doing the same thing, smashing solid opponents and once he stepped up he proved how good he is. I see the same success for ggg.Comment
-
I'll get more of a gauge on him when he fights a puncher. Unfortunately for us 160 is not a big punching division but soon he will face the likes of a Lemiuex, Canelo Cotto or a Jacobs or Quillin who any of those would be the biggest puncher he's fought yet. Then I can gauge where he really is. He's been walking through these light punchers. Stevens was probably the hardest puncher, and although he lost a lopsided fight, he had a few moments.Thanks for the laugh.
Ya, who knows what will happen when he steps up, but I'm confident he will be fine based on his performances. I'll use broner as an example. People were slobbering over broner and he was barely scraping by guys like ponce de Leon. Once he stepped up he lost, and since then people realize hes nothing special. How you win matters. Meanwhile ggg has been smashing that caliber of opponent. Kovalev was doing the same thing, smashing solid opponents and once he stepped up he proved how good he is. I see the same success for ggg.Comment
-
I'm looking forward to it. The division isn't even that terrible, guys just dont fight each other. Although that seems to be changing.I'll get more of a gauge on him when he fights a puncher. Unfortunately for us 160 is not a big punching division but soon he will face the likes of a Lemiuex, Canelo Cotto or a Jacobs or Quillin who any of those would be the biggest puncher he's fought yet. Then I can gauge where he really is. He's been walking through these light punchers. Stevens was probably the hardest puncher, and although he lost a lopsided fight, he had a few moments.Comment
-
How you win doesn't matter. How you deal with adversity matters. In Broner's case when he stepped up to face Paulie the adversity he faced was return fire and he basically just stood there and took it. Never bothered to move out of the way after firing his own shots. Adversity PUT A LIGHT ON HIS FLAWS. I love GGG but I would like to see how he faces, IDK, a KD or losing some rounds. Though I think he would pass that test I would still like to see it.Thanks for the laugh.
Ya, who knows what will happen when he steps up, but I'm confident he will be fine based on his performances. I'll use broner as an example. People were slobbering over broner and he was barely scraping by guys like ponce de Leon. Once he stepped up he lost, and since then people realize hes nothing special. How you win matters. Meanwhile ggg has been smashing that caliber of opponent. Kovalev was doing the same thing, smashing solid opponents and once he stepped up he proved how good he is. I see the same success for ggg.Comment
Comment